Not quite how that works. If that logic held then no state could make more strict gun laws than federal gun laws. Example, silencers are legal to purchase with a federal tax stamp, but Hawaii says no.

Silencers are legal but are regulated by federal law and on a state-by-state basis. (National Firearms Act” (NFA))  Because of this states are free to do as they please.  Our state chooses to ban it.   Like comon a quick google would prevent all your false statements.

You didn't say anything contrary to what I said. Hawaii makes gun laws in addition to federal gun laws. Just because you see the same wording does not mean you see the same application.  Welcome to liberal courts. Maybe you need to use google.

I give up you can live in your fantasy land logic.

Whatever dude, I voiced my concerns for anyone reading this and considering this product. Debating you on this issue is no longer worth my time.

If you don't understand that state interpretation can differ from federal interpretation then just keep scratching your head.

Why don't you ask the State AG. I did  and they returned my message.

Why don't you ask the State AG. I did  and they returned my message.
Clearly non of us are attorneys or the like.
You're pounding sand by arguing with what we already know of the law.

I am not arguing that they are illegal here. If you got the go ahead from the state AG then happy days.