California's U.S. senator Barbara Boxer, a leading advocate for any and every form of "gun control" every conceived. (From David Codrea's War on Guns blog). She's referencing her experience last week of being booed off the stage at the Nevada Democratic Convention by Bernnie Sanders supporters. Speaking of "activism"...



[Hey Mods, where is this "supposed" to be posted? It's "political", but about guns... just askin'...]

California's U.S. senator Barbara Boxer, a leading advocate for any and every form of "gun control" every conceived. (From David Codrea's War on Guns blog). She's referencing her experience last week of being booed off the stage at the Nevada Democratic Convention by Bernnie Sanders supporters. Speaking of "activism".

[Hey Mods, where is this "supposed" to be posted? It's "political", but about guns... just askin'...]

...
The jokes section would be appropriate

 

...
The jokes section would be appropriate

so most post of politicians should be post there as well?

so most post of politicians should be post there as well?

....
Makes sense to me

....
Makes sense to me

It would make more sense if we had a "BIG ASS" section to put them all in.

This is fine for gun related politics

More hypocrisy from California politicians...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/6/one-law-for-us-another-for-you/

Another one. No surprise, but still... it's amazing that they can be so open about their hypocrisy. Or is it just plain stupidity?

"If it is difficult to get a concealed weapon permit, I’m glad to hear that.

I wouldn’t want them to have it. Law-abiding citizens just shouldn’t have to carry a gun."

[The reporter pointed out the armed U.S. Capitol Police inside the building, just a few feet away from the congressman, Rangel laughed and responded:]

"Well that’s a little different. I think we deserve — I think we need to be protected down here."

Charlie Rangel
Congressman (D-N.Y.)
June 21, 2016

Congressman Says His Constituents ‘Shouldn’t Have to Carry a Gun’ — However, Congress ‘Deserves’ and ‘Needs’ to Be Protected by Them

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/06/23/congressman-says-no-guns-for-his-constituents-however-congress-deserves-and-needs-them/

Another one. No surprise, but still... it's amazing that they can be so open about their hypocrisy. Or is it just plain stupidity?

"If it is difficult to get a concealed weapon permit, I’m glad to hear that.

I wouldn’t want them to have it. Law-abiding citizens just shouldn’t have to carry a gun."

[The reporter pointed out the armed U.S. Capitol Police inside the building, just a few feet away from the congressman, Rangel laughed and responded:]

"Well that’s a little different. I think we deserve — I think we need to be protected down here."

Charlie Rangel
Congressman (D-N.Y.)
June 21, 2016

Congressman Says His Constituents ‘Shouldn’t Have to Carry a Gun’ — However, Congress ‘Deserves’ and ‘Needs’ to Be Protected by Them

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/06/23/congressman-says-no-guns-for-his-constituents-however-congress-deserves-and-needs-them/

some congress people spent too long in a fantasy, elitist world that they are so far removed from their constituents lives. They have no current experiences to relate.