There were 30 something people there, not sure what the ratio was of pro/neutral/anti as everyone was pretty quiet, and I thought there would be more people attending. It was the first time I saw the film and I didn't really notice the controversial "silence" part. They went over a lot of the same talking points you see on the news...more guns=more deaths, suicides, less gun deaths in other countries, 2a is for the militia, terror watch list list, showing NRA members support background checks, etc. To most people the film would look like a professionally produced documentary that made good points for gun control and that gun rights supporters support gun control. However they don't tell the whole story on their facts and will lead people to the wrong conclusions. The film was like a high class Michael Moore film.
The film made me realize why a lot of gun people support background checks on private and gun show sales of firearms. I don't think they thought about how it would work. They would have to do the transaction through a FFL or dealer, or go through a police permitting process like Hawaii. Both requires time and money to do, and wouldn't have much effect on crime.
The discussion part at the end was a bit disappointing. Sen Esperro was there but Harvey was not present ( I assume for a good reason) and did the discussion through Skype. Worse is Harvey didn't see the film so he couldn't talk about it which was the main point of the discussion. Best part of the discussion was a pro 2a woman in the back talked about how she was allowed to open carry for her job and was a firearms instructor, but was not allowed to carry off duty and how she felt threatened walking around at night where previous rapes had occurred. She said that she wouldn't be able to defend herself (she was pretty skinny) against an attacker. I think this made a lot of people stop and think about it. I think we need more people like her to testify and represent the 2a community. Other than that there were a few thoughts discussed but nothing substantial.
I think the $10 I spent for the film was worth it even if some of it goes to the film producers. It's good to see how the other side portrays guns and what the public will see and feel. Then we are more knowledgeable and can counter these things more effectively.