As for his comment, as was pointed out earlier, it is a matter of interpretation.  Sorry, I can't find anything on trump supporters assaulting people, maybe verbally?  My google foo is weak. I would think I would get 1,000,000 hits on that topic.

The most egregious instance I recall is a protestor who is walking up some stairs, being led out of a stadium by a police officer. As the protestor is walking up the stairs someone in the aisle stands up and clocks him without provocation. Unfortunately for the whole picture, the protestor is black and the assailant is white. I will try to find the specific video.

Wonder how many Trump supporters were destroying Milwaukee  this past weekend

Absolutely zero I am sure, but not really relevant.

Liberals occupy, riot, verbally and physically intimidate, threaten violence, resort to violence, attempt to silence free speach of any who have opposing views.

Conservatives attempt to affect change via lobbying through non violent, open dialogue and a widely accepted political process.

The differences in approach are glaring.

It's completely relevant.  You just don't want to accept the connection.

The most egregious instance I recall is a protestor who is walking up some stairs, being led out of a stadium by a police officer. As the protestor is walking up the stairs someone in the aisle stands up and clocks him without provocation. Unfortunately for the whole picture, the protestor is black and the assailant is white. I will try to find the specific video.

Here is the video to which I was referring to. I think in a later news story the cowboy hat wearing guy ended up being arrested.

Even if Trump paid someone to beat up protesters, it's still the person's choice and consequences to bear.  Unless Trump's camp held his kids hostage or held a gun to his wife's head, no one was using force. 

Everyone uses metaphors and other phrases that are meant to express an idea, but sane people know the difference between hyperbole and explicit calls to violence.

If you don't believe that, then the Cops who caught Son of Sam should have also arrested the neighbor's dog for telling him to kill.

Yes that man hit the protestor of his own volition, I am not saying he acted on Trump's order. I am saying that there are violent Trump followers.

And most mass shooters are Hillary and Obama followers.

Do you have a point, or just saying stuff for no reason?

This has to do with Trump's stupid comment that could suggest, inspire, imply, etc. someone to assassinate Clinton.

As the video shows, it does not.  Unless you have something new to add, please stop repeating yourself.

I think this thread has pretty much "jumped the shark" when we start trying to come up with comparatives of liberal or conservative violence.  We have to dig to come up with a lone or rare incident where the conservative or Trump backer starts shit.  But we could make a thread with pages upon pages of atrocities backed by liberals, socialists or anarchists and I can't find much separation between the last 3 groups. 

Anyone with a shred of training in crowd management and/or riot control will be easily able to explain the political stance, motivations, ideals or political party bias and support behind these looting, pillaging and plundering violent events.  Rioting conservatives?  Nope.

As the video shows, it does not.  Unless you have something new to add, please stop repeating yourself.

Guys, let's not bicker. As someone pointed out, we are our own worst enemy.

If we keep tearing each other down with our comments, that doesn't do our 2a tribe any good long term.