[correction] Not Supreme Court

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/obama-nominates-possible-first-muslim-american-judge-to-federal-court/ar-AAiB3Qq?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Should be no surprise for Muslim in chief.

Both Obama and Clinton have had Muslims as their top advisors. 

No shock what their advice would have been in this nomination! 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/obama-nominates-possible-first-muslim-american-judge-to-federal-court/ar-AAiB3Qq?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Should be no surprise for Muslim in chief.

not supreme

Is this a problem? I care more about the judges stances and records than their religion.

Is this a problem? I care more about the judges stances and records than their religion.

Yes.  It's a problem whether or not you care.

Yes.  It's a problem whether or not you care.

So even if it were a conservative judge you would say no just because he's a Muslim? I would take a conservative Muslim judge with a good record over a flaming liberal Buddhist

So even if it were a conservative judge you would say no just because he's a Muslim? I would take a conservative Muslim judge with a good record over a flaming liberal Buddhist

That person would have to have a very long demonstrable history of upholding the Constitution.  If the nominee is a supporter of Sharia, then HELL NO! 

I don't care about the religious leanings of a judge as long as those leanings, and political leanings, are fully separated from the function of their position.

Sadly we see too much intermingling of those in these positions of power.

Is this a problem? I care more about the judges stances and records than their religion.

+1

The xenophobia and bigotry that is implied here is truly disappointing.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Just in case folks are still in denial. 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/10/muslim-scholar-no-separation-church-state-islam/

Some people refuse to acknowledge reality even if it hit them on the face like a 2x4.  I would like to know which past or present Muslim country would be considered a good place to live in, especially for non-Muslims (Infidels).

Wake up, guys. The world is not all sunshine and rainbows.

Followers of Islam are split in to to groups :

The media wants you to believe its Radical Islam and Islam. This is not the case.

The real split is Islam and moderate Islam. The teachings of Islam are incompatible with the teachings of the west and incompatible with the Constitution. Yes their is exceptions the moderates who believe the Koran is a guide and not an instruction manual. But the Korans sole ideology is my way or death. Countless studies show that Muslims the world over want to force their beliefs on everyone and want to implement sharia law ( good buy civil rights and the constitution).

You can not be a Muslim and a Judge, the ideology of the Muslim fait are incompatible with our laws.

Followers of Islam are split in to to groups :

The media wants you to believe its Radical Islam and Islam. This is not the case.

The real split is Islam and moderate Islam. The teachings of Islam are incompatible with the teachings of the west and incompatible with the Constitution. Yes their is exceptions the moderates who believe the Koran is a guide and not an instruction manual. But the Korans sole ideology is my way or death. Countless studies show that Muslims the world over want to force their beliefs on everyone and want to implement sharia law ( good buy civil rights and the constitution).

You can not be a Muslim and a Judge, the ideology of the Muslim fait are incompatible with our laws.

What about muslims that reject Sharia law? Much of the conflict with out laws and values comes from Sharia law.

I have not reviewed his previous record as a judge.  So this is on face value of the articles above.

I'm not one to argue that Muslim Sharia should be accepted by America, nor IMO, be accepted anywhere in the world in the 21st century.  What I would argue is that if dude is a patriot and an American, then I see no problem with him being a judge. 

Muslims generally have a more conservative moral view, and if he sticks to interpreting AMERICAN law and not interjecting sharia law, then all should be good in the world.  I would think that conservative people would be comfortable with that. 

The fact of the matter is that lefty liberals should be more worried about this appointment than conservative minded people. If you go into the whole sharia thing.  Just saying....

It's bad cause most Muslims believe in sharia law not federal law.

I have not reviewed his previous record as a judge.  So this is on face value of the articles above.

I'm not one to argue that Muslim Sharia should be accepted by America, nor IMO, be accepted anywhere in the world in the 21st century.  What I would argue is that if dude is a patriot and an American, then I see no problem with him being a judge. 

Muslims generally have a more conservative moral view, and if he sticks to interpreting AMERICAN law and not interjecting sharia law, then all should be good in the world.  I would think that conservative people would be comfortable with that. 

The fact of the matter is that lefty liberals should be more worried about this appointment than conservative minded people. If you go into the whole sharia thing.  Just saying....

Wish I knew how to like a post on tapatalk. But well said.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk