I haven't really kept track of the recount thing.

Can someone give a quick update?

I just saw that MI recounted, and the votes certified, and Trump won by 10K votes.

So, that is a final answer right? End of discussion?

What about other states?

Don't know about the latest on this recount garbage, but I really want to see a comprehensive audit and investigation of the entire election system in all 50 states. 

The left has openly encouraged voter fraud. And even in our state, I have little faith in the election system.  Every election, there is too many problems and discrepancies that go unchecked. And of course, virtually our entire elected body is leftist Democrats that refuse to do squat about it.

There's a ton of speculation out there, running the whole gamut of possibilities.

Here's a very brief article outlining one possible scenario with the underlying tactical intent (I really hope he's wrong and things don't go this route...):

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/the_democrats_real_strategy_in_launching_recounts.html

[with the url for the illegal alien voting study at the end...]

November 27, 2016

The Democrats’ real strategy in launching recounts

By Richard Baehr

The recount in Wisconsin, and the coming ones in Michigan and Pennsylvania will not change the outcomes in any of the states.  No recount ever changes thousands of votes.  I do not think that is the purpose.

The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters.  If all 3 states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232.  No one hits 270. 

Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first time this happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson. 

If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it?  The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote  (he lost by over 2.1 million*), he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.

*[this article provides some documentation regarding the illegal alien voters...]:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/11/27/the-historic-facts-about-illegal-alien-voters-full-research-pdf/#more-125026

I read that the PA deadline was 11/21 so Stein has filed a lawsuit since they missed it.  Even if they win the lawsuit, she still has a lot of hurdles to overcome.
WI has allowed the recount but denied the hand count request.   Don't know about MI.
Why the recount and why is Jill Stein involved?   I think that Hillary just needs another excuse to get pilut again and abuse her servants.   Stein has been bought out like a hooker with Soros as her john.   Remember her attacks on Hillary?

Jill Stein gets her name circulated more doing this than what she got from her entire campaign. Win/win for her.

I heard this morning that this is just another divisive scam on the left's part to keep their patrons divided and help raise money for the Green Party which just discovered if they play nice with the dems then they stand to reap the financial benefits.