http://info.cmsri.org/the-driven-researcher-blog/dirty-vaccines-new-study-reveals-prevalence-of-contaminants

Every Human Vaccine Tested Was Contaminated by Unsafe Levels of Metals and Debris Linked to Cancer and Autoimmune Disease, New Study Reports

Must be hard to sleep at night worrying about this stuff.

FYI, my child has autism and vaccines did not cause it.

I have to go to my safe space now

Yeah that article is retarded.  No backup sources.  Impossible facts.

Yeah that article is retarded.  No sources.  Impossible facts.

Okm im going to call you on the BS this time.

The sources are in the dam article HOW COULD YOU MISS THEM.

"In the study, published this week in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, the researchers led by Antonietta Gatti, of the National Council of Research of Italy and the Scientific Director of Nanodiagnostics, say their results “show the presence of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccine samples” not declared in the products’ ingredients lists."

The different colored words are  links (standard internet procedure)

The links literally take you to the medical journal where the study was published.

The metals have been linked to various conditions and metals have been found in the medications, There is no result that says that the metals caused the conditions just that they can be found. They couldn't find consistency in the medications for the metals, Different batches had different amounts and some had none.

In case you still cant find it heres a link to the medical journal, Its actually an amazing piece of scientific research.

http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

Okm im going to call you on the BS this time.

The sources are in the dam article HOW COULD YOU MISS THEM.

"In the study, published this week in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, the researchers led by Antonietta Gatti, of the National Council of Research of Italy and the Scientific Director of Nanodiagnostics, say their results “show the presence of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccine samples” not declared in the products’ ingredients lists."

The different colored words are  links (standard internet procedure)

The links literally take you to the medical journal where the study was published.

The metals have been linked to various conditions and metals have been found in the medications, There is no result that says that the metals caused the conditions just that they can be found. They couldn't find consistency in the medications for the metals, Different batches had different amounts and some had none.

In case you still cant find it heres a link to the medical journal, Its actually an amazing piece of scientific research.

http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

I correct my statement.  I ment other verified testing.  One source isnt enough.  One company doing testing isnt enough for proof.  I need multiple sources for something like this.   Especially when there are multiple sources saying the opposite.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/05/health/with-fda-vacancy-trump-sees-chance-to-speed-drugs-to-the-market.html?_r=0

"Mr. O’Neill is a libertarian who is on the board of the SENS Research Foundation, a charity that funds anti-aging research, and until recently served on the board of the Seasteading Institute, an effort to create new societies at sea.

At an anti-aging conference in 2014, Mr. O’Neill advocated something he called “progressive” approval, in which drugs that were proved safe, but not yet proven effective, could be allowed on the market. “Let people start using them, at their own risk,” Mr. O’Neill said. “Let’s prove efficacy after they’ve been legalized.”

The truth is out there you just have to separate the truth from the "fake news". I decided to keep my child vaccine free. It doesn't make sense to take something that has multiple side effects in hope of MAYBE preventing one disease. Also majority of diseases that they are pushing vaccines on are treatable today.

I know people who avoid the flu vaccine, but It works for me.
Some years ago, I had a bad flu and passed out. Fortunately, I avoided serious injury.
That was a wake up call that my body just isn't as strong as it used to be.
Since then, I take a flu shot every year with no ill effects.
I've not gotten sick in many years.

Just wait until you have to get the really fun vaccinations like Anthrax


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The truth is out there you just have to separate the truth from the "fake news". I decided to keep my child vaccine free. It doesn't make sense to take something that has multiple side effects in hope of MAYBE preventing one disease. Also majority of diseases that they are pushing vaccines on are treatable today.

If your kid dies of a preventable disease I hate to be the one but "I told you so"

If your kid dies of a preventable disease I hate to be the one but "I told you so"

i bet you're loads of fun at parties...

The truth is out there you just have to separate the truth from the "fake news". I decided to keep my child vaccine free. It doesn't make sense to take something that has multiple side effects in hope of MAYBE preventing one disease. Also majority of diseases that they are pushing vaccines on are treatable today.

So, you prefer the risk of death over the risk of some unproven side effect?

The outcomes are obviously not equivalent. 

When doing cost/benefit and risk analysis, you not only look at the probabilities of outcomes, but also the severity of each outcome.  Death is the worst possible result of your decision.  It makes more sense to err on the side of preventing death than preventing a side effect.  That's not just an opinion.  It's a logical evaluation of the available solutions.  Doing nothing puts your kid at risk as well as others.  Taking the vaccine only puts your kid at risk.  That fact alone supports vaccination.

There's rat poison in the punch bowl.

People are debating whether or not to drink it, and arguing about the percentage of rat poison (some say it's enough to cause problems, others say it's not above that threshold).

The real question to be asking is, why is there rat poison in the punch bowl and how do we make sure there is no rat poison in the future?

Also, only a few people pointed out there's rat poison and went to some lengths to test it.

The punch bowl seller says it's fine to drink.

There's rat poison in the punch bowl.

People are debating whether or not to drink it, and arguing about the percentage of rat poison (some say it's enough to cause problems, others say it's not above that threshold).

The real question to be asking is, why is there rat poison in the punch bowl and how do we make sure there is no rat poison in the future?

Also, only a few people pointed out there's rat poison and went to some lengths to test it.

The punch bowl seller says it's fine to drink.

Your analogy ignores the protective benefits of the punch preventing death in 99.9% of drinkers.  Everyone not drinking has a greater chance of dying if they contract the disease the punch prevents, and/or infecting a child who wasn't old enough to have the punch yet.

There's rat poison in the punch bowl.

People are debating whether or not to drink it, and arguing about the percentage of rat poison (some say it's enough to cause problems, others say it's not above that threshold).

The real question to be asking is, why is there rat poison in the punch bowl and how do we make sure there is no rat poison in the future?

Also, only a few people pointed out there's rat poison and went to some lengths to test it.

The punch bowl seller says it's fine to drink.

To continue this analogy there is also a 10 foot rat biting peoples heads off who don't drink the punch.  A few people are allergic to the punch for whatever reasons and because 99% of the people drank the punch the rat is unable to find suitable food and dies.  Your method scares everyone about the perhaps dangers of the punch and the giant rat gets free food and makes babies and we have a group of giant rats biting peoples heads off.

If your kid dies of a preventable disease I hate to be the one but "I told you so"

.

You have your veiws and I have mine. I rather make my own decisions not just on the fact that someone tells me it's preventing a disease that was dying out before the vaccine was introduced. You also look past the fact the CDC keeps coming out with new vaccines. How much vaccines did you take and how much does you child have to take now? Why is there such a big difference? That being said I would not wish any harm on someone's child just for the chance to say "I told you so" you have a blessed day sir

So, you prefer the risk of death over the risk of some unproven side effect?

The outcomes are obviously not equivalent. 

When doing cost/benefit and risk analysis, you not only look at the probabilities of outcomes, but also the severity of each outcome.  Death is the worst possible result of your decision.  It makes more sense to err on the side of preventing death than preventing a side effect.  That's not just an opinion.  It's a logical evaluation of the available solutions.  Doing nothing puts your kid at risk as well as others.  Taking the vaccine only puts your kid at risk.  That fact alone supports vaccination.

Death is a possible outcome regardless of vaccination or not, if death is out of the question for those vaccinated them why is there a vaccine compensation program? Why do you have to sign a waiver to prevent you from sueing the vaccine companies? The information packets I got from queens states the risk of SIDS. So if my child has the same chances of dying as a vaccinated kid. Then why put my child at risk of vaccine side effects?

Death is a possible outcome regardless of vaccination or not, if death is out of the question for those vaccinated them why is there a vaccine compensation program? Why do you have to sign a waiver to prevent you from sueing the vaccine companies? The information packets I got from queens states the risk of SIDS. So if my child has the same chances of dying as a vaccinated kid. Then why put my child at risk of vaccine side effects?

Death by other causes than the disease addressed by the vaccine is irrelevant.  You can leave the doctor's office after getting the shots and die in a car crash, but that's not a good argument against vaccines.

99.9% is NOT a 100% guarantee (notice the numbers are different).  Vaccine compensation programs are for the very rare cases where the recipient has an allergic reaction to an immunization.  The programs began in the 1980s as a way to prevent vaccine shortages lower vaccination rates which both risk a resurgence in the diseases being vaccinated against.  It's a no-fault settlement program which compensates patients or parents financially for unpredictable negative outcomes of vaccinations.

If your child has the SAME RISK of dying from the vaccine as from SIDS, why NOT vaccinate?  As least SIDS is not communicable.  The diseases, though, are communicable, and put other kids at risk.