"They don’t even try,” a local border guard tells The Daily Caller News Foundation. “We haven’t had a Syrian in six months.”

Rewind back to September 2015 and there’s a completely different picture. Thousands of migrants streamed across the border every day as they made their way north to Austria, Germany and Scandinavia.

“It was an invasion,” Laszlo Toroczkai, the mayor of Asotthalom, told TheDCNF. “Illegal immigration is a crime in a normal country. It’s not a normal thing to break into a country.”

Toroczkai decided to start a war on illegal immigration. He wanted a fence, and the government agreed.

Hungary’s second border fence has just been completed in the southern town of Asotthalom. The 96-mile long, 14 ft. tall double-line of defense doesn’t look too intimidating from a distance.
Go a little closer and you’ll notice several layers of razor-wire capable of delivering electric shocks, cameras, heat sensors and loudspeakers ready to tell migrants they’re about to break
Hungarian law if they as much as touch the fence.

Add a few hundred military officers and “border hunters” and it’s virtually impossible to break.

I doubt this pathetic wall could stop Mexicans. For Hungary, there are easier alternatives. Unfortunately for us, not so with Mexicans.

Can you explain your doubts?  You a tendency to post opinions but never seem to support them with facts, studies, examples or evidence.

For example, Why are Mexicans more resourceful than Syrians?

I can say the same about most replies from everyone on this forum. It's pretty much what we do.

The fence shown in the photo could be easily circumvented using common tools. The thing about Mexicans is that they have a lot of time and resources available. That's why Trump wants to build a wall and not extend the existing fence.

Call me when 60% of the illegals fly in on proper visa and overstay.  When those are stopped then the wall will work 100%

Did you read, or just look at the picture?

Arguing one solution is ineffective at combating all types of illegals in the US, and should therefore not be attempted, is quite ignorant on it's face.

What do you think?
But spending $21B to treat some of the symptoms is ridiculous. I don't understand those who are socially conservative and fiscally liberal. Spending billions on Reagan's star wars plan was useful as an empty deterrent against the Soviets. A giant ass $21B wall is not going to deter determined Mexicans. Trump already allocated $1.5B for border security today. I say let's leave it at that, let's make America great, and let's start build highways, bridges, and airports.

I think you didn't read the words about electrified razor wire, heat sensors, loud speakers, redundant barriers and hundreds of guards and "immigrant hunters."

You have yet to address the reduction in illegals as it represents cost to the nation each year and how it will offset the cost of the wall, even though that's been explained time and again.

Would you like some pictures of how that works?   

Infrastructure is something real that Americans can use and make America great.    All that the wall would do is make Trump great and leave the rest of us with the bill.

Yes, I recognize that you have offered a graphic based on spurious data. It's hilarious when politicians pull statistics like $113B out of their ass and hold them up for us like a bouquet of flowers then tell us to inhale. 
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/sep/01/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-illegal-immigration-costs-113-bi/

There is no evidence that a $21B wall will lower the speculated $113B cost of illegal immigration. Infrastructure is something real that Americans can use and make America great.    All that the wall would do is make Trump great and leave the rest of us with the bill.

Do you have evidence Mexicans would not be kept out when other countries have shown barriers do work?

Have you met a Mexican? (That was meant as a compliment and not an insult.)