This is a very good example of what the Left is about when it comes to Climate Change "Science".  Read the Tweets in the article sent to the NYT and author.

You aren't allowed to believe anything the state doesn't tell you to believe.  Trying to be objective results in attacks and insults, with absolutely no discussion on the merits.


The death of civil discourse: Twitterverse eviscerates Bret Stephens over climate column

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/331310-the-death-of-civil-discourse-twitterverse-eviscerates-bret-stephens

The New York Times's Bret Stephens might be the most hated man in America right now.

His crime? Actually being pragmatic on the debate around climate change, while avoiding being blinded by partisanship by playing strictly to one side.

The backlash against Stephens, a former Wall Street Journal conservative columnist and proud #NeverTrump member who recently signed on with the
Times, follows his (completely reasonable) debut column that urges each side of the climate change debate to be open to listening to the other side, in
order to have a better understanding around possible solutions.

But compromise is a big no-no in today's completely intolerable political landscape, which has declared that there cannot be any debate on this issue.
Just ask John Kasich how things worked out for him when he based his presidential run on healing a polarized country and compelling its political system
to work for the good of the country again.

On climate change, the mantra many in media now espouse is, “It's over. It's decided. Put it in the books. Sit down and shut up if you even think of
discussing it, unless it includes the word ‘crisis,’ ‘doomed’ or ‘underwater.’"

From a Rolling Stones Magazine Twitter Account: