Tell me it ain't so... (Read 3239 times)

mrgaf

Tell me it ain't so...
« on: May 19, 2017, 08:41:25 PM »
Ok, know it's Farcebook but a friend of mine said that Trump has Joe Lieberman down as his front runner for the FBI job! Probably not true BUT, just saying..... :shake:
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.  Thomas Paine.

No man can get rich in politics unless he is a crook.  It cannot be done. Harry Truman

Only good liberal is one taking a dirt nap.

whynow?

Re: Tell me it ain't so...
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2017, 08:49:48 PM »
I don't believe that is a good choice.  If true hope I'm wrong.

punaperson

Re: Tell me it ain't so...
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2017, 09:17:47 PM »
Just got an email from GOA re Lieberman as possible FBI director (unfriendly formatting, but readable...)(They don't have a link up yet, but it should soon be on their "Take Action" page, and sends an email to Trump. http://gunowners.org/current-action-alerts/):

Leftist Media Pushes Trump to Nominate Anti-Gun Liberal for FBI Chief

ACTION: Urge President Trump not to appoint an anti-gun FBI Director

Dear Punaperson,

For four months, the Leftist media has worked to stampede the Trump administration into jettisoning conservative principles and moving to the Left.
Thus far, the White House has been good on guns.
Trump signed a resolution repealing the Social Security Gun Ban.  He signaled that he will sign concealed carry legislation.
Trump's Supreme Court pick is a lot better than we would have gotten from Hillary Clinton.
And yet the Left keeps trying.
The most recent media "siren song" is a call for Trump to nominate a "moderate" to head the FBI.
From the standpoint of Trump's self-interest, a liberal nominee would spend the next three and a half years providing fodder for the Left's campaign to impeach and incarcerate Trump.
But a Leftist nominee will do a lot of damage to the Second Amendment too.
Currently on the table is the question of whether an unpaid parking ticket will make you a "fugitive from justice" and strip you of your gun rights.
The FBI will also decide whether to back up the NICS system and create a de facto national gun registry.
 
And, if the president orders the FBI to remove the names of 257,000 law-abiding veterans from its NICS gun ban list, there is the question of whether the FBI will comply with that order.
All of which brings us to an anti-gun liberal, former Connecticut Democrat Senator Joe Lieberman.
Make no mistake:  Despite what MSNBC thinks, Lieberman is no moderate.  True, he staged a revolt against ultra-Left Connecticut Democrats when they tried to nominate someone else for his Senate seat.
Lieberman's record on guns is abysmal.  He voted against legislation to allow law-abiding Americans to exercise their Second Amendment rights in parks, on trains, or in the District of Columbia.
He supports so-called "gun free zones," which turn innocent civilians into sitting ducks.
Lieberman supported legislation to ban all private firearms sales in the country, and he cast one of the deciding votes against concealed carry reciprocity.
His voting record earned him an "F" rating with Gun Owners of America.
In short, Lieberman hates guns as much as the craziest gun hater in the Senate.  And, as FBI director, he would have an enormous influence over gun policy.
Lieberman's ascendancy falls on the heels of equally dangerous suggestions.
Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who, as you know accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of bribes on behalf of his wife's state Senate campaign in Virginia -- and, in exchange, dropped charges against Clinton's home-brew server.
And, lest we forget, the spotlight briefly shined on the potential nomination of Merrick Garland (Obama's Supreme Court pick), who, as you remember, voted to overturn Heller and declare that the Second Amendment was nothing but a "militia right."
Why are all of these crazy Leftists suddenly gaining favor with Republican politicos?
Supposedly, they are pushing for a nominee who would gain quick support from Chuck Schumer and would be expedited through the Senate.
But trust us:  No one who would be acceptable to Schumer would be any friend of the Second Amendment.  And any Schumer candidate would spend the next three years working to destroy the Trump administration -- and Republicans' House and Senate reelection prospects.

ACTION:  Click here to contact President Trump.  Urge him to reject Joe Lieberman, Andrew McCabe, Merrick Garland or any other anti-gun candidate as a prospect for the new FBI director.

Sincerely,
Tim Macy
Chairman

« Last Edit: May 19, 2017, 09:24:40 PM by punaperson »

Bunker

Re: Tell me it ain't so...
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2017, 09:57:28 PM »
This would be a disgusting choice! The sorry republicans are so worried about appeasing the left that they would ever consider this is beyond me. A non-political person with a deep association with law enforcement and understanding of criminal law should be the kind of person they are looking for, not some dried up hack politician. He should also ensure the candidate is a proponent of the 2a and not some anti-gunner. Screw what the democrats and left think...he should ram his appointee through. Roughly half of the population would applaud a director who actually really knows his job and understands what the Constitution is all about and enforces the law. Hopefully, Trump is just playing the game and will ultimately pick a good candidate and not some politician. The lousy republicans have all three chambers and they keep thinking they can work with the democrats and find some common ground. They need to wake up and realize this isn't going to happen. They, along with the media, hate Trump and will oppose anything he tries to do...they are trying to destroy Trump and anyone close to him. I can guarantee if the democrats had all three chambers, they would be pushing all kinds of rubbish down the republicans throats. The republicans need to start doing what the voters voted for! 

punaperson

Re: Tell me it ain't so...
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2017, 06:56:15 AM »
One of the many articles about the Democrats opposition to Lieberman's possible appointment as FBI Director. I guess that's what happens when a Democrat gives a speech at the Republican National Convention reaming the Dem's newfound savior Barack Obama...

Democrats Sound Off on Trump Eyeing Lieberman for FBI Director

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-05-18/on-trump-s-shortlist-for-fbi-chief-lieberman-townsend-keating

Donald Trump may want to pick a new FBI director before setting out on his first foreign trip as president Friday, but one of his top choices is being scorned by Senate Democrats -- even though he was once one of their own.

Several Senate Republicans said Lieberman would be a good choice, but a senior Democratic aide said there is overwhelming opposition among Senate Democrats, with many concerned he wouldn’t be a fair arbiter.

[Includes a brief list of some of the other candidates. I like Henry Hudson:]

Henry Hudson

A federal judge in Richmond, Virginia, the 69-year-old Hudson would be a popular choice among conservatives. Best known for a 2010 ruling against the individual mandate in Obamacare -- later overturned by the Supreme Court -- he also was responsible for sentencing former NFL star Michael Vick after his conviction for operating a dogfighting ring. Hudson’s reputation as tough on crime would probably appeal to Sessions, but the Obamacare decision would weigh on the minds of Democratic senators.

RSN172

Re: Tell me it ain't so...
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2017, 07:56:48 AM »
What happened to Trey Gowdy that so many seemed to like?   I nominate our FBI for FBI director.  He will set them straight.
Happily living in Puna

punaperson

Re: Tell me it ain't so...
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2017, 08:38:58 AM »
What happened to Trey Gowdy that so many seemed to like?   I nominate our FBI for FBI director.  He will set them straight.
Gowdy removed himself from consideration. Our FBI might have trouble getting enough votes for confirmation given his statements about Democrats, which would likely apply to numerous Republicans as well, given their recent statements and actions. I'd prefer him over Lieberman for sure...