Army searching again for a new caliber (Read 11642 times)

ren

Re: Army searching again for a new caliber
« Reply #20 on: August 09, 2017, 03:38:32 PM »
Even better, a civvie. A POG as you may say.
Hey I think I remember you, the guy who never really agrees with my opinions!

Well I was just saying, I don't think the M14 is a good option for the standard infantry. In other words I don't think the M14 will stand a chance in replacing the M4/M16 in this century as the standard issue rifle.
If I recall correctly, the M14 (or variant) was used as a DMR during that time, and still being used in limited numbers but primarily for designated marksmen.
I agree with some of your opinions.
How did you test M855A1 ?
Deeds Not Words

ren

Re: Army searching again for a new caliber
« Reply #21 on: August 09, 2017, 03:40:16 PM »
How about a SCAR heavy?  Or the Colt (whatever is the one that can be configured to .308)? 

Other options for .308. 

I haven't played in the sandbox, but I've shot the SCAR heavy, FAL and other battle rifles.  To ME, .308 seems quite heavy, but I think adding .308 into the mix wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing.

or an AR10
Deeds Not Words

drck1000

Re: Army searching again for a new caliber
« Reply #22 on: August 09, 2017, 03:43:06 PM »
or an AR10
Yup.  Those too.   :thumbsup:

mangosteenqueen

Re: Army searching again for a new caliber
« Reply #23 on: August 09, 2017, 03:45:40 PM »
I agree with some of your opinions.
How did you test M855A1 ?
Like hell my local gun shops will have some on the shelves. I guess I'll have them special ordered when I have a chance if they can find any. I've watched a few videos, like the Wound Channel on youtube.
Good to know that I'm not entirely mistaken.

zippz

Re: Army searching again for a new caliber
« Reply #24 on: August 09, 2017, 03:57:22 PM »
M14 or AR10 with 210 rounds is about 10lbs heavier than similarly configured M4.  That's a lot of weight to cut elsewhere.

ren

Re: Army searching again for a new caliber
« Reply #25 on: August 09, 2017, 04:00:21 PM »
M14 or AR10 with 210 rounds is about 10lbs heavier than similarly configured M4.  That's a lot of weight to cut elsewhere.

body armor
Deeds Not Words

zippz

tim808

Re: Army searching again for a new caliber
« Reply #27 on: September 20, 2017, 11:33:25 PM »
Curious.   The guys that would have been affected - are they relieved or bummed that 7.62 died?

As a teenager, once carried a garand while pushing deer up a gulch. 

My dad said it was a good for brush

Didn't seem too bad at first....

Thinking about it now, I don't think he ever mentioned using it himself.....bastard.

Heavies

mangosteenqueen

Re: Army searching again for a new caliber
« Reply #29 on: September 21, 2017, 09:00:46 AM »
Would be nice if they adopted a hybrid muzzle device for the M4.

davgdavg

Re: Army searching again for a new caliber
« Reply #30 on: September 22, 2017, 10:29:02 AM »
Why don't they just have two? Bigger guys get issued and trained for bigger rounds...seems to make sense in everything except logistics. Just like in ancient times you had varying weapons for varying people. I understand the reality of possibly having to use another person's ammo in a bad situation, but I would be curious as to how often that actually happens.

ren

Re: Army searching again for a new caliber
« Reply #31 on: September 22, 2017, 11:33:28 AM »
Arms issued are based on MTOE and not arbitrary.
Deeds Not Words