David Codrea succinctly re-raises the question of how (legally) could a citizen be required to get permission to exercise a right. We all know how the local courts and Ninth Circuit deal with this issue, and SCOTUS as well by denying cert to cases of obvious infringement. Just a reminder. Not that there is much we can do here in Hawaii where the tyrants will be re-elected time and time again with the support of the overwhelming majority of the drones useful idiots uninformed uneducated citizens.

Amish Photo Exemption Bill Raises Questions about Gun Owner Control Laws and More

https://www.ammoland.com/2017/09/amish-photo-exemption-bill-raises-questions-about-gun-owner-control-laws-and-more/

Where does anyone get off requiring a free citizen to get permission to exercise a right?

Who has legitimate moral authority to impose prior restraints on rights that, depending on your beliefs, are either “endowed by our Creator” or inherent to the condition of being human?

And where do they get off legally, since Supreme Court precedent acknowledges:

“This is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed …”

The Cult of Statism is determined to impose faith in a monopoly of violence enforced by follower disarmament, even though all credible observations show its tenets to be superstitious nonsense. And we know what happens to non-believers, heretics, infidels…