Both the permit to acquire and registration sections of HRS 134 state "whether usable or unusable, serviceable or unserviceable". Your argument pertaining to "function" is invalid.
What the "creator" states its purpose is is irrelevant. If it meets the criteria for a firearm, it's a firearm.
The ATF doesn't recognize milling an 80% receiver as "manufacturing."
apart from the fact that Hawaii law and federal law are both separate with their own definitions and legal standings. If Hawaii wanted a firearm to be defined by the ATF or by federal law then it would need to say so in the law.
As shown in HRS 134-1 defintions
"Assault pistol" means a semiautomatic pistol that accepts a detachable magazine and has two or more of the following characteristics:
(1) An ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;
(2) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward hand grip, or silencer;
(3) A shroud that is attached to or partially or completely encircles the barrel and permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the second hand without being burned;
(4) A manufactured weight of fifty ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded;
(5) A centerfire pistol with an overall length of twelve inches or more; or
(6) It is a semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm;
but does not include a firearm with a barrel sixteen or more inches in length, an antique pistol as defined in this section,
or a curio or relic as those terms are used in 18 United States Code section 921(a)(13) or 27 Code of Federal Regulations section 478.11.