Would this challenge the "residence" definition? Because if it does, then that would mean that it's not your 4 walls and roof.
§134-25 Place to keep pistol or revolver; penalty. (a) Except as provided in sections 134-5 and 134-9, all firearms shall be confined to the possessor's place of business, residence, or sojourn;
I register to do business in the state of Hawaii therefore Hawaii is my place of business.
I reside in the state of Hawaii therefore Hawaii is my residence.
I lay my head in Hawaii therefore Hawaii is my place of Sojourn.
All of this must be true or it would be illegal for a homeless person to own a firearm and that would violate their constitutional rights.
If the land is under a HOA or is a private street the state/city has no ownership and as such no control over it. The home owners own it and as such it is their property tied to their place of residence.
Not to mention Hawaii Place to keep/carry laws are unconstitutional. It should be a list of exclusionary areas not a list of places you can carry.
It shall be lawful for people to keep a firearm in all places they have the legal right to be : EXCEPT for Schools, court buildings, churches ect....