Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick alleges he was 'very aggressive,' but her latest interview raises new questions

Julie Swetnick, the third woman to publicly accuse Supreme Court hopeful Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct from decades earlier, said in a television interview Monday that Kavanaugh was a "very aggressive, very sloppy drunk — very mean drunk."

But parts of Swetnick's account in the face-to-face interview also appeared to deviate from her affidavit.

Now even CNBC questioning Swetnick's credibility after interview on on NBC News.

Whoops. . .

Her credibility was in question the minute she said she attended 10 gang rape parties which were never reported by any bystander/attendee, victim, participant or parents.

Then it came out she has a history of false sexual assault accusations, when SHE is the one who was found to be behaving in inappropriate ways in the workplace by making sexually suggestive comments.

Her credibility was in question the minute she said she attended 10 gang rape parties which were never reported by any bystander/attendee, victim, participant or parents.

Then it came out she has a history of false sexual assault accusations, when SHE is the one who was found to be behaving in inappropriate ways in the workplace by making sexually suggestive comments.

one would think after one gang rape, you would stop going to parties at that location

Yeah. I didn't mean that she was ever really credible. But when even CNBC questions credibility and doesn't even try to spin it, then that says something.

LOL!  The Creepy Porn Lawyer representing accuser #3 (gang rape story) just got smacked down by the Senate.....

Serious question for males: 

If you ran a business, and was filling a vacant position, would you seriously consider hiring a woman now?

Many are reconsidering if it's worth the risk.

Kavanaugh isn't the only victim of these unsupported criminal accusations.

Let's not forget Commifornia is trying to pass a law that women must be on the board of directors.  If there are 6 board members then a min of 3 women must be on it.  This is LAW they're trying to pass.

Let's not forget about the plastic straw law and the 12 year olds now can get a sex change laws they have.

InB4 "wage gap".  If women did get paid 25% less than men, then wouldn't all big companies hire more women?  To save 25% on payroll.  My dentist has an all woman staff.  Would feel weird if a dude was sitting at the receptionist desk or as a dental hygienist. =P

- Norway became the first country in the world to introduce a gender quota for company boards.

- But ten years on, the results aren't too flattering.

- There's been a good effect on listed companies’ boards, but zero effect on top management teams.

It would be very difficult to measure what impact having a % of male to female ratio would have.  Because you cannot go back and change the ratio.

So in the end, it's the government telling you how to run your company.  Would an all female board have to bring on males?

The FBI probe into Brett Kavanaugh will end tomorrow with an expected vote on the Senate floor by the end of this week.

According to The Wall Street Journal, sources confirmed that "that the FBI investigation into the allegations of sexual misconduct
against Judge Kavanaugh could wrap up very soon, well ahead of the end-of week deadline." The probe could be done possibly
late Tuesday or early Wednesday.

"Agents had interviewed at least four key people as of Tuesday in its background investigation of Judge Kavanaugh," reports WSJ.
"The White House had given the bureau until Friday to wrap up the probe."The debate among the Senators now is whether or not
the FBI's findings should be made public, and that outcome is still up in the air. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday
that only Senators will be allowed to see the report.

"We will get an FBI report soon. It will be made available to each senator and only senators will be allowed to look at it. That’s the
way these reports are always handled. These background checks from the FBI to the Judiciary Committee. And we will be voting this
week," McConnell said.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer challenged that assertion by saying it should be made public, mostly because the FBI hotline
has been flooded with crazy allegations with no credibility whatsoever.

"We are getting report after report of people who call the FBI Hotline, the tips line, and are never called back," Schumer said. "People
who claim - we don’t know the veracity of these claims - but people who claim to have new and compromising information."

Other Republicans, like Sen. John Cornyn, think the FBI probe should be made partially public. "There does need to be some sort of public
statement, if not the reports themselves," he said. "Since the accusations have been made public, it seems to me that people are not going
to be satisfied until some public statement about what the FBI supplemental background investigation showed is made."

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said such an action would not be standard protocol. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said
the release should "be limited."

Recent polls indicate that if the FBI probe finds nothing, a majority of Americans want to see Kavanaugh confirmed.

REPORT: FBI Probe Finishing Tomorrow

...Sen. John Cornyn, think(s) the FBI probe should be made partially public. "There does need to be some sort of public
statement, if not the reports themselves," he said. "Since the accusations have been made public, it seems to me that people are not going
to be satisfied until...

More contradictions surfacing. Moving toward perjury?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/christine-blasey-ford-ex-boyfriend-says-she-helped-friend-prep-for-potential-polygraph-grassley-sounds-alarm

When one digs deeper, sometimes you dig up skeletons.

Well, based on that story it appears Ford lied during her testimony. More so than just being inconsistent. Which the Dems could shrug off. But a lie is a lie.