Hopefully they don't send her back, but it looks like Honolulu's village idiot got lost
In Washington D.C.  I expect to see her picture on a milk carton.

She's been attending lots of fundraisers the last month or so, piggybacking on the Democrat resistance to Kavanaugh's nomination.

After the vote, that well dries up.  I'm sure she's out milking that cow for all it's worth today and tomorrow, promising to "continue fighting" a lost cause.

To be honest, this is what I would like to do to Hirono. If only I could get Soros to fund ME.

https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/1047990537100427264

Actions have consequences.

North Dakota Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, a red-state Democrat, announced her opposition to Kavanaugh Thursday, citing the FBI report and what she called doubts surrounding his character. Heitkamp is facing long odds in her November re-election bid, apparently owing in part to her reluctance to support Kavanaugh. Fox News' polling shows Republican challenger Kevin Cramer now leading her by 12 points (53-41 percent). Last month, he was up by only 4 points (48-44 percent).

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-fate-hangs-in-balance-with-3-swing-vote-senators-trying-to-get-to-yes-source-says

I was thinking Trump should nominate a woman next time to replace Ginsberg (you know he'll get at least one more Justice pick).

In fact, that woman should be Hillary Clinton.

Maybe then we'll have a full investigation into her scandals.   

Feinstein just announced she's received a letter from yet another woman accusing Kavanaugh of sexual assault.

There were no details given other than the woman's name:

Anita De Leigh

This whole mess should have ended when no police report was filed 35 years ago.

This whole mess should have ended when no police report was filed 35 years ago.

To me, she has no credibility due to her still not reporting it to the police. If this was really about a crime being committed, it can still be reported.

deleted

To me, she has no credibility due to her still not reporting it to the police. If this was really about a crime being committed, it can still be reported.

=================
 Statute of limitations?
 ---
 BTW, I caught the first few minutes of anti-Trump Colbert show last night.
 It was truly disgusting how Colbert was making fun of Kav, a respected judge for 12 years.
Basically he was smearing Judge Kav for the amusement of his audience.
 
 

=================
 Statute of limitations?
 ---
 BTW, I caught the first few minutes of anti-Trump Colbert show last night.
 It was truly disgusting how Colbert was making fun of Kav, a respected judge for 12 years.
Basically he was smearing Judge Kav for the amusement of his audience.

I’ve seen little bits and pieces of his show. He is a sick individual. The judge deserves our respect. This is not supposed to be a partisan discussion. Or a political battle. 

To me, she has no credibility due to her still not reporting it to the police. If this was really about a crime being committed, it can still be reported.

But, but, but do you hve no empathy for women who have suffered sexual abuse? That sort of attitude shows a cavalier caveman attitude toward women!

At least that’s my imitation of what a liberal college friend is spewing. He very argumentative and actually quite intelligent. Just when he gets his mind stuck on something, there no shaking it. In this case, the root of this is really Anti-Trump. It’s no logical and he has friends trying to argue with him. It doesn’t help that a few are as extremely right wing as he seems to be left though.

=================
 Statute of limitations?
 ---
 BTW, I caught the first few minutes of anti-Trump Colbert show last night.
 It was truly disgusting how Colbert was making fun of Kav, a respected judge for 12 years.
Basically he was smearing Judge Kav for the amusement of his audience.

I’ve seen many arguements that this is about his character and not subject to standard of innocent until proven guilty and criminal standards don’t apply. Can’t wait to have that logic turn around to bite person sprewing it.

I’ve seen many arguements that this is about his character and not subject to standard of innocent until proven guilty and criminal standards don’t apply. Can’t wait to have that logic turn around to bite person sprewing it.

That's never gonna happen. They are hypocrites, and liars, and have permanent double standards. Booker admitted that he groped at least one woman during his youth (only one?), Ellison has an outstanding complaint of domestic violence against him which has been brushed off by ludicrous reason by a totally partisan "nonpartisan" "investigation", and of course there are many other cases, not the least of which are the seriously un-FBI-investigated charges of sexual assault, harassment and rape against Bill Clinton by numerous women. Obama admitted to all kinds of drug (cannabis, alcohol, cocaine, etc.) use/abuse when he was young, and I didn't see any leftist claims that he was unfit for the presidency because of that. The socialist Democrats have conpletely different standards fror themselves compared to what they have for their enemies. That's never gonna change. You're never gonna see all the late night talk show comedians and stand ups reaming the leftists night after night after night... even though there is acutally more material there. Hypocrites to the core.

Then reports of Leyland Keyser being pressured to modify, oh I mean clarify, her previous statements because they were baking used against CBF. I believe that is now on record in the investigation.

That's never gonna happen. They are hypocrites, and liars, and have permanent double standards. Booker admitted that he groped at least one woman during his youth (only one?), Ellison has an outstanding complaint of domestic violence against him which has been brushed off by ludicrous reason by a totally partisan "nonpartisan" "investigation", and of course there are many other cases, not the least of which are the seriously un-FBI-investigated charges of sexual assault, harassment and rape against Bill Clinton by numerous women. Obama admitted to all kinds of drug (cannabis, alcohol, cocaine, etc.) use/abuse when he was young, and I didn't see any leftist claims that he was unfit for the presidency because of that. The socialist Democrats have conpletely different standards fror themselves compared to what they have for their enemies. That's never gonna change. You're never gonna see all the late night talk show comedians and stand ups reaming the leftists night after night after night... even though there is acutally more material there. Hypocrites to the core.

You watch late night comedians?

In things like the hypocrisy, I’m VERY black and white. While i think in reality it probably has slim to no chance of happening, I still hope it comes around to bite them in the ass. To a certain extent, I think it has been. Time will tell and one checkpoint will come in Nov.

You watch late night comedians?

No, but I do read articles about their "acts" that sometimes include brief video excerpts that verify the statements quoted in the articles.

Judicial Watch head Tom Fitton's op ed in today's USA Today, as an "Opposing View". There is a poll at the end. Currently 69%+ "strongly agree"...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/10/05/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-senators-should-vote-yes-editorials-debates/1527857002/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=action+alert&utm_term=members&utm_content=20181005182848

Confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

The FBI report on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh confirms what most in Washington knew all along: There is no supporting evidence for the claims made against him. The supplemental report is said to show nothing that corroborates any claim of sexual assault or misconduct. This concludes the seventh FBI background check of Kavanaugh.

The confirmation vote for him can’t come soon enough.

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations were corruptly handled by Sen.Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and fellow Democrats. They didn’t have the votes to stop him, so they sought to destroy him with smears.

Judicial Watch head Tom Fitton's op ed in today's USA Today, as an "Opposing View". There is a poll at the end. Currently 69%+ "strongly agree"...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/10/05/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-senators-should-vote-yes-editorials-debates/1527857002/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=action+alert&utm_term=members&utm_content=20181005182848

Confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

The FBI report on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh confirms what most in Washington knew all along: There is no supporting evidence for the claims made against him. The supplemental report is said to show nothing that corroborates any claim of sexual assault or misconduct. This concludes the seventh FBI background check of Kavanaugh.

The confirmation vote for him can’t come soon enough.

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations were corruptly handled by Sen.Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and fellow Democrats. They didn’t have the votes to stop him, so they sought to destroy him with smears.

Like I mentioned, this will not convince the DNC of anything nor liberals.  The only thing that can fully exonerate Kav is if there was a video recording and it showed that it was someone else.
The recording would have to have the time and date in the bottom corner
The guy behind the camera would have to sign an affidavit and show his ID
Both parties would have to show both their ID's, social security card, birth certificate, and their grandma there to verify who they are