California magazine ban held unconstitional.  Well, well -- a win!https://www.nraila.org/articles/20190329/breaking-federal-court-finds-california-magazine-ban-violates-the-second-amendment?fbclid=IwAR3Y6pffip-bk15ZFw7TAsey-WfpJzKdQ_F8BU9aurieCDuqrIeL-MNW8Y0

good link

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20190329/breaking-federal-court-finds-california-magazine-ban-violates-the-second-amendment

Thanks for the new link.  Hope Hawaii next.

Thanks for the new link.  Hope Hawaii next.

Don't hold your breath,  Someone has to take it to court.
The cops in this state do as they please, and the justice system here
is the same.
By the latest 9th circus  Young v Hawaii ruling we should be open carrying right
now, instead your government is  ignoring that ruling and spending your tax dollars to
fight the ruling.   And we all thought they overthrew the Monarchy and Hawaii feudal
system.

Don't hold your breath,  Someone has to take it to court.
The cops in this state do as they please, and the justice system here
is the same.
By the latest 9th circus  Young v Hawaii ruling we should be open carrying right
now, instead your government is  ignoring that ruling and spending your tax dollars to
fight the ruling.   And we all thought they overthrew the Monarchy and Hawaii feudal
system.

If they do not appeal, can't someone get a slam dunk win here citing precedence?

If they do not appeal, can't someone get a slam dunk win here citing precedence?

Hawaii would be smart just to say "OK sure you all can have STANDARD capacity magazines. It's not like you can carry them anyway.. BWAAHAAHAAHAA, snort, snort"

If they do not appeal, can't someone get a slam dunk win here citing precedence?

I suspect no one in Hawaii or the Ninth Circuit is ever going to get a "slam dunk" on any Second Amendment rights-restoring case...

The California AG has asked for a stay by April 5, pending their possible (extremely likely?) appeal.

California requests stay of Judgement on standard capacity magazines

http://blog.joehuffman.org/2019/04/02/california-requests-stay-of-judgement-on-standard-capacity-magazines/

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of California (“Defendant”), hereby does apply to this Court for an order, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62, staying the Judgment entered in this action on March 29, 2019 (Dkt. No. 88) pending appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  Specifically, Defendant requests that the Court stay the Judgment—which declares California Penal Code section 323101 unconstitutional and enjoined from enforcement—to preserve the status quo pending appeal as it existed prior to entry of the Judgment, whereby, during the pendency of the appeal, section 32310(a) and (b) will remain in effect and section 32310(c) and (d) will remain subject to the preliminary injunction issued on June 29, 2017 (Dkt. No. 28).  Defendant respectfully requests that this Court rule on this stay application by April 5, 2019.