I can see it now. The 2020 Presidential match-up:
An old, white New York City billionaire going head-to-head with the incumbent old, whiteish-orangish New York City billionaire.
Bloomberg will be 78 in February, making him 79 the month after his potential 2021 inauguration.
Trump was 70 at his inauguration.
I'd love to see the melee that ensues at the DNC debates when Bloomberg pulls out his accountants' reports on how badly Warren's "plans" can never be paid for no matter HOW MUCH she takes from the "wealthy".
It's unconstitutional to just confiscate wealth, BTW. Taxes are levied on incomes, real property and transactions. To target someone to take their money for government's purposes using no other criteria than "I think you have too much" is not part of America's system. Anytime the government takes anything from its citizens, there has to be a justification, such as a fine for criminal activities or a tax that applies to a behavior.
ACA is a perfect example. The bill was passed with a mandate that fined people for opting out. If they'd called it a tax, it may not have gotten the votes needed to pass.
Once they had to defend that mandate in front of the Supreme Court, they changed the law to say it's a "tax". Bait and switch, to put it mildly.
Even if Warren took 100% of the wealth from all of the 1% she claims needs to pay more, that would fund Medicare for all for about 2 years, and there will be no more billionaires to milk.
That doesn't include paying for all her other plans: free college, free daycare, student loan forgiveness, increasing the minimum wage, paid family leave, slavery reparations, federal dollars to build more housing....