Ya we all know they just take anyone off the street and make them police officers! Dont they do screenings to weed out these kind of people don’t they have training to know when to shoot or make them lick shit! because this is a regular job for regular people right?

  If the Cop reads you your rights, and you swear he didn't, the video should resolve that kind of accusation pretty fairly.

This is a TV myth, Police are not required to give you a Miranda warning upon your arrest, ONLY if they are going to interrogate you after your arrest. And they can ask you all the questions they want PRIOR to arresting you without giving you that warning. If you have done something that might potentially get you arrested ALWAYS STFU before and after.

You need to remember that there are fascist goons on this forum who will only concede to the infallibility of law enforcement only after they are legally prosecuted AND explicitly brought to their attention.  They care nothing for the abuses of law enforcement that do go reported, but get no media coverage or those accounts that do not get reported at all.

So if you were given the opportunity to rewrite the use of force policy what would you change?

One of things they could implement is more force on force situational training that gauges each beat officer on the propensity of using their lethal and non-lethal weapons.  Based on their performance, specific classes that tries to improve their decision making cycle with the goal of ensuring that public that law enforcement officers will employ all their non firearms means first (e.g., passive and aggressive verbal deescalation, hand-to-hand combat, tasers, batons, etc.) and only use their firearms as a last resort in any given situation.



Have you ever gone to the Police Commission with your concerns?

Talking to them is like trying trying to convince City Hall of the pitfalls of Rail.

So if you were given the opportunity to rewrite the use of force policy what would you change?
Have you ever gone to the Police Commission with your concerns?

This is a TV myth, Police are not required to give you a Miranda warning upon your arrest, ONLY if they are going to interrogate you after your arrest[/b]. And they can ask you all the questions they want PRIOR to arresting you without giving you that warning. If you have done something that might potentially get you arrested ALWAYS STFU before and after.

The requirement to give Miranda warnings came from the Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966).
In Miranda, the Court held that a defendant cannot be questioned by police in the context of a custodial interrogation until
the defendant is made aware of the right to remain silent, the right to consult with an attorney and have the attorney present
during questioning, and the right to have an attorney appointed if indigent.

I am surprised that the fascist goons that defend all the despicable acts by law enforcement on this forum have not attacked your post yet.

Who defended such acts?

There's a difference between an interview and an interrogation.