The fact that the media is calling Solemiani a religious leader/good guy, makes me question what has he been involved with all these years.  But CNN did post an article that he was involved with Benghazi.

Looks like he has been using his title as a General as a shield to be untouchable.  All while planning attacks against the US and others for the past 20 years.

Iran has reportedly been using Iraqi protest participants to escalate those protests to more violent actions against the US and US-friendly Iraqis.

No real proof has been presented to the pubic in regards to those allegations.



Iran has been escalating their international violence for years -- threatening and seizing oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, harassing and detaining US warships, using Hezbollah and other terrorist groups to target civilians in Israel, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, etc. 

You make it sound like Iran has always been the sole aggressor in the region.  Got news for you, there have been a number of other aggressors in the Middle East in recent memory that you forgot to mention.

How about Israel's illegal occupation of Palestinian territories?

What about Saudi Arabia's war on Yemen?

Oh, let's not forget the illegal invasion of Iraq, Libya, and Syria by the US and her allies?



Solemiani was the commander of Hezbollah.

I beg to differ.  I believe Sheik Hassan Nasralla is their leader and Secretary General.

quoting your responses doesn't work, because you replied inside the [q u o t e] block you inserted from me.  It would be better to cut/paste the comments from others if you want to make replies to your responses possible
   

some people were concerned that this was President Trump's "Benghazi" and Iran played the same card...wrong move. The US responded with appropriate action.
USA > Iran.
#USAIsGreat

I'm not going to copy and paste your replies, since you're not interested in properly posting them without making it difficult.  I know you've had this brought to your attention before.

Let's just say that all of your comments are argumentative and opinions.

Nothing about what you posted justifies Iran's terrorist acts.  As for who commands Hezbollah, there are militia commanders, and there are those who represent Iran, the country that provides material support and guidance to those militias and who gives the militias their marching orders.

You can argue about organizational charts and formal titles all you want, but in reality, the local commander of a militia, say Hezbollah, who does not act autonomously, but rather as a proxy for Solemiani and the Iranian Supreme Leader, is in fact a subordinate.

No different than the Commander of the Pacific Fleet or 3rd Air Force.  They all answer to the branch secretaries, the joint chiefs,  and ultimately the Commander in Chief.

Symantecs.