Kyle Rittenhouse Rifle Shooter in Kenosha, supine position shoots three 8-25-20 (Read 116312 times)

Kuleana

I am just saying China is one of the world's worst human rights violators. Would you not agree?
They are not the model country for human rights for sure.

Flapp_Jackson

Let's wait for the trial.   :shaka:

You say that NOW, after actual facts have been made available -- not just left-wing anti-self-defense propaganda.

Before, you were more than eager to lynch Rittenhouse for daring to stand up against rioters and defend his own life.

You're so transparent ...

... and pathetic.   :sleeping:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Flapp_Jackson

Who told you that?

Your trans-girlfriend?   :-*

You are rather pathetic at coming up with original insults, too.

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

ren

Who told you that?

Your trans-girlfriend?   :-*

what a misogynist, transphobic comment
Deeds Not Words

aieahound

what a misogynist, transphobic comment

Which one ? This one ?

I hear you like the trans-girls best of all.   :geekdanc:

Because I thought this was a pretty entertaining come back.

Who told you that?

Your trans-girlfriend?   :-*

Kuleana

Which one ? This one ?

Because I thought this was a pretty entertaining come back.

I appreciate your fairness Hound!   :shaka:

It goes to show, I like debating issues and don't mind people disagreeing, with my own views.  I understand that any strong mind will not be convinced.  However, particularly when I present opposing or dissenting views, there is a knee-jerk group think mob that is quick to challenge, make personal attacks, or continue with childish jokes.  I love the 1st Amendment, so definitely any poster can say their peace.

What sucks and I am sure newer members are seeing is that there is a double-standard.  To those, who are guilty, reveling and enjoying the mud slinging and character assassination, those same individuals childishly don't like it, when I fight back their cyber-bullying, as you just witnessed, in this thread.

Perhaps, may be one, of the reasons, that many new members and veteran members, who do not post, on this forum, is because of the vocal, " you better be parroting, what we think, or else" click, of like-minded individuals.  Many of the silent majority probably have their own distinct views, but are not so eager, to post or share them, because of the dog-piling that they will receive, if their points of contention, does not exactly fit the party line.

JMHO.

drck1000

#alwaysthevictim

ren

I appreciate your fairness Hound!   :shaka:

It goes to show, I like debating issues and don't mind people disagreeing, with my own views.  I understand that any strong mind will not be convinced.  However, particularly when I present opposing or dissenting views, there is a knee-jerk group think mob that is quick to challenge, make personal attacks, or continue with childish jokes.  I love the 1st Amendment, so definitely any poster can say their peace.

What sucks and I am sure newer members are seeing is that there is a double-standard.  To those, who are guilty, reveling and enjoying the mud slinging and character assassination, those same individuals childishly don't like it, when I fight back their cyber-bullying, as you just witnessed, in this thread.

Perhaps, may be one, of the reasons, that many new members and veteran members, who do not post, on this forum, is because of the vocal, " you better be parroting, what we think, or else" click, of like-minded individuals.  Many of the silent majority probably have their own distinct views, but are not so eager, to post or share them, because of the dog-piling that they will receive, if their points of contention, does not exactly fit the party line.

JMHO.

When you are grasping for rebuttals you continue to fall back into victimhood and accuse people of cyberbullying, racism and all other phobias. You play both sides of the coin when it comes to mud slinging and getting mud. The only relevant threads to you is anything anti American. You don't share anything that is firearms related.
Deeds Not Words

Flapp_Jackson

When you are grasping for rebuttals you continue to fall back into victimhood and accuse people of cyberbullying, racism and all other phobias. You play both sides of the coin when it comes to mud slinging and getting mud. The only relevant threads to you is anything anti American. You don't share anything that is firearms related.

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

aieahound

Just stop turning basically every thread you touch into an anti-American, illegal overthrow, imperialism, racism rant unrelated to the topic being discussed.
This thread you haven’t been as bad thankfully.

Although I do have to admit once you do, a bunch of members follow you down the rabbit hole.

Flapp’s always going to insult you.
But remember he has a split personality. He can be very helpful but for some reason he has it in for you. (I can guess the reason with the number of threads you’ve derailed.)
He also has it in for me but like to poke at him for fun when he warrants it.
And I usually let him get the last word otherwise that shit would go on forever.

Just my opinion.

When you are grasping for rebuttals you continue to fall back into victimhood and accuse people of cyberbullying, racism and all other phobias. You play both sides of the coin when it comes to mud slinging and getting mud. The only relevant threads to you is anything anti American. You don't share anything that is firearms related.

Make sure you read that.
No cyber bullying or insults attached.

zypherdex

Ahh yes, such an informative and productive discussion we have here

changemyoil66

So bicep guy is speaking at protest now. He has not been arrested for possessing a glock even though hes a felon. Guess no witnesses to see him holding the glock...oh wait...

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

oldfart

Ahh yes, such an informative and productive discussion we have here
==========
Think of it like virtual domestic violence
What, Me Worry?

Kuleana

Just stop turning basically every thread you touch into an anti-American, illegal overthrow, imperialism, racism rant unrelated to the topic being discussed.
To be clear, I was on point discussing the issues regarding Rittenhouse and the following posts below will clearly show, who's posts were instrumental, in taking the discussion off-topic.



First, here is the post that starts it all.  By the picture depicted, it is clear that this person was trying to provoke my love, for Hawaii's former monarchs, thereby, starting a string of responses that would derail this thread.



Then, you have this post, whose author chose a response, with wording that was similarly provocative.
Your ancestors thought the same way, and that is why you do not have a Kingdom any more.




Here is a cheap personal attack pot shot, from someone that I was not talking to at all.
I thought all cops are bad?
now you want their help?
p-thetic



Likewise, the comment below was the beginning, of the Permatroll's bringing race, into this thread, and kicking this thread's derailment, into high gear.
^^^ the very definition of racists.



Here is another post that had nothing to do, with the topic, but was made to extend the provocation.
It’s a good thing Hawaiian nationals didn’t take things into their own hands, they might’ve stopped the overthrow and we wouldn’t be living in the greatest country on earth.



Another personal attack.
At this point it is clear our in-house CCP “Hawaiian” is either lying or losing grip on sanity and nobody here is buying what he is selling.



The Permatroll putting himself into the argument, just to continue arguing, with me, and further the derailment.
I was raised by a single parent mother -- living with my mother's mother and father.

I had school teachers, Scout leaders, Jr ROTC instructors, employers, uncles, and church leaders who were all excellent role models for me throughout my life until I went to college.

You make so many unsupported assumptions just to push your narrative, it really is pathetic.



More classic provocation, with the obvious goal, to prolong the derailment.
back in the days of 1898



A couple of set-up question made, to preface more personal attacks.
Are you against equal rights for women? I see someone practicing progressive values.

Too bad the Chinese kill so many of their baby girls. Maybe you could have met more in real life



Finally, another personal attack, from the same individual, whose initial post above, was directly responsible, for derailing this thread, at the very beginning.
what a misogynist, transphobic comment



As you can see Hound, by reviewing this thread, from its very first page, I wanted and still do want, to discuss all, of the issues, regarding Rittenhouse's case.

The posts that I made, which had nothing to do with Rittenhouse, were all responses, to the provocations, personal attacks, and childish insults, from those who apparently disagreed, with the positions I took.  Instead of debating the issues, they purposely posted things, knowing full-well this Hawaiian will not take such disrespectful treatment, by anyone; and then pointing to the responses I made, in order to blame me, for always derailing threads.  Hence, those responsible, for this thread's derailment, thus far, was not me, but due to the provocative posts listed here as well as seen, on the rest, of this thread.

 :stopjack:

ren

You're not depicting the whole argument.
These were your posts prior and after my post depicting destruction of public property and you agreeing that police can't be everywhere. If you were there while that statue was being defaced would you have the right to defend it with your firearm? Or would you simply just call the police after the fact?

That boy has no legal authority to protect public property with a firearm.

Where are the police, when you need them?
Deeds Not Words

Kuleana

You're not depicting the whole argument.
These were your posts prior and after my post depicting destruction of public property and you agreeing that police can't be everywhere. If you were there while that statue was being defaced would you have the right to defend it with your firearm? Or would you simply just call the police after the fact?
Why did you specifically choose the statue of Kamehameha I, to make your point though?

You couldn't find any other example less sensitive to all Hawaiians?

aieahound

Gall Dang Rabbit Hole.....

So bicep guy is speaking at protest now. He has not been arrested for possessing a glock even though hes a felon. Guess no witnesses to see him holding the glock...oh wait...

Can’t believe he’s not under arrest for assault with a deadly weapon, illegal possession of firearms, etc.

But then again, the guy in Portland who killed the right winger was busted twice for illegally carrying in the few months before he committed the shooting.

ren

Why did you specifically choose the statue of Kamehameha I, to make your point though?

You couldn't find any other example less sensitive to all Hawaiians?

simple yes or no. Would you defend public property, in this case a statue?
One can argue that Kyle had a similar motivation in the chords of patriotism and nationalism.
Deeds Not Words

Kuleana

simple yes or no. Would you defend public property, in this case a statue?
One can argue that Kyle had a similar motivation in the chords of patriotism and nationalism.
The answer is no.

I do not take the law, into my own hands, and play Judge Dredd, marshalling out jungle justice and deadly force, when dealing, with public property.  I believe in calling the authorities and let due process, of the law, take its course.

Rittenhouse is a young naïve, high school dropout, who was disillusioned with thoughts, of patriotic grandeur.  Given Rittenhouse's immature and unstable mental nature that forms the basis, of his twisted view and administering his form of justice, as evidenced, in his decision, to commit deadly force, in the assault and battery, of a defenseless unarmed girl, roughly two months prior; I am not buying the arguments, of those, who claim Rittenhouse, as being a brave, totally innocent, cool headed, under extreme stress, young patriot.

ren

The answer is no.

I do not take the law, into my own hands, and play Judge Dredd, marshalling out jungle justice and deadly force, when dealing, with public property.  I believe in calling the authorities and let due process, of the law, take its course.

Rittenhouse is a young naïve, high school dropout, who was disillusioned with thoughts, of patriotic grandeur.  Given Rittenhouse's immature and unstable mental nature that forms the basis, of his twisted view and administering his form of justice, as evidenced, in his decision, to commit deadly force, in the assault and battery, of a defenseless unarmed girl, roughly two months prior; I am not buying the arguments, of those, who claim Rittenhouse, as being a brave, totally innocent, cool headed, under extreme stress, young patriot.

OK. Got it. At least you have some trust in the police and you will defer to them in this example.
Deeds Not Words