Kyle Rittenhouse Rifle Shooter in Kenosha, supine position shoots three 8-25-20 (Read 115992 times)

Flapp_Jackson

Nadler said he wants the DOJ to look into the "VERDICT."  I certainly hope that includes looking into both the prosecution and the defense, and whether the prosecutor violated Rittenhouse's CIVIL RIGHTS:

The 5th amendment was obviously violated when Binger implied Kyle's silence after arrest and up to the trial was a tactic to listen to all the testimony against him before giving his version of the story.  The judge slammed Binger for that.

The prosecution tampered with and altered video evidence they provided to the defense.  They claim it was unintentional -- that an email program must have done that.  Email programs may resample a audio/video file to create a compressed version for transmission, but the version the defense had was also CROPPED, removing part of the video at the borders.  There were two applications on the prosecutor's laptop:  Handbrake and FormatFactory.  Both are used to resize, crop, and encode video.  When I send someone a large file, I include in the message the filename, file type, and exact size, so the recipient can verify they received it intact.

The prosecution chose to indict one of the key witnesses, nicknamed and referred to throughout the trial as "Jump-Kick Man" -- the guy who jumped over Kyle while kicking him square in the face as Kyle was on his back.  Turns out (allegedly), the name of the man was already known to the prosecution during the trial, and they never gave that name to the defense, nor did they call him as a witness.  Maurice Freeland is a 39-year-old career criminal and convicted felon who has open charges of domestic violence, disorderly conduct, and criminal damage to property against him.  Reportedly, Freeland met with prosecutors and told them he wanted immunity before taking the stand, which means the state knew all along who “Jump-Kick Man” was.

The prosecutors argue that convicted child rapist Joseph Rosenbaum had only lunged at Rittenhouse after he aimed his gun at accused rapist Ziminski.  The state made sure that Ziminski, an eye witness who could clear all of this up, was unavailable to testify in the Rittenhouse trial because he is currently being prosecuted for arson.  Prosecutors charged Ziminski with arson and then delayed his trial so he wouldn’t be available to testify in the Rittenhouse trial.

The state tried every dirty trick they could think of, some of which fly in the face of the Constitutional protections guaranteed to the accused.  I think if the DOJ doesn't include them in their investigation report, they are complicit, and Kyle should sue the city, the state and the feds for civil rights violations.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Inspector

Enjoy!
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

Flapp_Jackson

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

eyeeatingfish

Was just going to mention that Kyle's life from now on will never be the same.  He'll always be the guy that people will say "You da guy, eh?"

Side eyes.
Whispers behind his back.
Or worse, outright threats and comments to his face.

Maybe forever.

Could it be that this was the intent of this bogus trial?  Was this what Susan bull$h*t Ballard prophesized when she said "Is it worth it?"

If I were him I would consider changing my name and moving to a different state... After I sued the crap out of the media.

His attorney did say that he was getting treatment for PTSD. A lot for a 17 year old to handle.

Flapp_Jackson

Here's something that's been on my mind after seeing all the lies told about Rittenhouse this past week/year.

There's been no evidence of Kyle of being a White Supremacist, yet the media and Biden have made statements implying, or directly accusing him of this.

Let's say that all the same evidence was presented to us as jurors with one addition:  Emails and web browser history implicates Kyle Rittenhouse is a member of a White Supremacist Group. 

As a juror, would that matter in your determination of his guilt or innocence?  I mean, he wasn't charged with a hate crime, the people shot were White, and his actions that night in no way demonstrated an inclination toward interacting with the people he met differently based on race.

The MSM and Left (redundant??) are screaming about a White Supremacist getting acquitted of shooting 3 people at a BLM "protest."  Does that mean the law makes a special exception for White Supremacists?  Are they guilty of all crimes no matter what the evidence shows?
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

QUIETShooter

I think this trial really brought to light how messed up this nation has become as far as justice and law and order.  It's not about the defendant or even about the subject of the trial itself.

It's about getting a result that will play into the hands of an extreme agenda.  And the groups that fuel this agenda will lie to spin facts that are no longer the truth.  Even our sad, inept, and full of shit president is playing into the hands of these groups who put his sorry ass where it is now, the president of the US, which is the laughing stock of leaders worldwide.

His refusal to apologize and acknowledge his earlier comments of Kyle devastates Americans who still believe in truth and justice and the rule of law.

The judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse case is one of the remaining bastions with courage enough to fight the tidal wave of corruption prevalent everywhere in government and the media.

How the media is acting before, during, and after this trial is downright deplorable. 

Did you hear that, Hillary?
Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.

changemyoil66

Even my dad whos anti 2a thought this trial was BS. And he has TDS bad.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

drck1000

Even my dad whos anti 2a thought this trial was BS. And he has TDS bad.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
This one brought out some interesting reactions.  A friend is an avid shooter.  Competes, trains often, etc.  However, she and her friends, including upbringing are very liberal and defensively privileged. She posted about outrage in #nojustice

Should Rittenhouse have been there?  Well, that’s for another discussion.  Being there and what happened was what these proceedings were about.  I think that’s what many are missing. 

aieahound

The judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse case is one of the remaining bastions with courage enough to fight the tidal wave of corruption prevalent everywhere in government and the media.

 :thumbsup:

I respect the guy.
Probably shouldn’t have made the hope the Asian food for lunch isn’t stuck in an LA harbor comment out loud though.

oldfart

This one brought out some interesting reactions.  A friend is an avid shooter.  Competes, trains often, etc.  However, she and her friends, including upbringing are very liberal and defensively privileged. She posted about outrage in #nojustice

Should Rittenhouse have been there?  Well, that’s for another discussion.  Being there and what happened was what these proceedings were about.  I think that’s what many are missing.
=============
Should Kyle have been there?
Well maybe not.
On the other hand, who do you think the townsfolk would prefer to have been there? Kyle or those BLM rioters?
If the rioters were not there Kyle wouldn't have been there either.
I always try to step back and look at the bigger picture.
What, Me Worry?

drck1000

=============
Should Kyle have been there?
Well maybe not.
On the other hand, who do you think the townsfolk would prefer to have been there? Kyle or those BLM rioters?
If the rioters were not there Kyle wouldn't have been there either.
I always try to step back and look at the bigger picture.
I was commenting on what those who are screaming outrage have been crying about.

As for rioters? Nah. MSM said peaceful protestors.  ::)

oldfart

I was commenting on what those who are screaming outrage have been crying about.

As for rioters? Nah. MSM said peaceful protestors.  ::)
========
deliver my comment to your liberal friends...please
 :rofl:
What, Me Worry?

aieahound

I actually saw an article headlined Rittenhouse Decision means end to peaceful protests.
What world are some people living in ? Peaceful protests ?

changemyoil66

The leftist narrative fell apart and seen as lies during TV broadcast. So now theyre on damage control.

Tell a lie long enough and sheeple will see it as the truth.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

changemyoil66

This one brought out some interesting reactions.  A friend is an avid shooter.  Competes, trains often, etc.  However, she and her friends, including upbringing are very liberal and defensively privileged. She posted about outrage in #nojustice

Should Rittenhouse have been there?  Well, that’s for another discussion.  Being there and what happened was what these proceedings were about.  I think that’s what many are missing.
Its like when people say if OC or CCW is legal, the bad guy will take the gun from u and use it against u.

Ive already seen a bunch of taser comments on fb/ig like that.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

macsak

aieahound

The Academia Spin:

“ The communications on James Madison University's official Instagram account also briefly included a so-called "student takeover" video in which a JMU student lamented the "murdering" of "two beautiful Black lives" – even though the jury agreed that Rittenhouse acted in self-defense and the two men he fatally shot were both White.

"Reminder: it is hard to focus on science if you are worried you might be legally shot or run over at a protest," the JMU Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry tweeted on Saturday, the day after Rittenhouse's acquittal. The department continued, referencing various shootings of Black men that the Black Lives Matter movement has turned into rallying cries.

"It is hard to focus on science if you are worried your loved ones might be killed getting Skittles, or selling cigarettes, or playing with a toy gun, or sitting in their apartment, or jogging, or wearing a hoodie," the department added, obliquely referencing the deaths of Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, Ahmaud Arbery, and Trayvon Martin.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rittenhouse-posts-virginia-university-slammed-042949991.html

Edit: I have not seen the actual video.

aieahound

Rittenhouse is pretty put together for an 18 year old.
Responses to the situation and now media and all.

eyeeatingfish

Rittenhouse is pretty put together for an 18 year old.
Responses to the situation and now media and all.

I am sure he received quite a bit of coaching. He did go through a mock trial.

But still I would agree, his answers were good and composed.  Even in the shooting itself he showed quite a bit of skill and composure.

Flapp_Jackson

I just had a cocktail called the Rittenhouse:

4 shots with a chaser.


Man!  A guy could really get loaded!   :geekdanc:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw