Day 2.
Arguable.
It’s replicating cells and clearly life.
Or getting ready to anyway.

It’s is an other when it’s an other.
Objectively.

Product of….that’s almost a whole conversation in itself.

I’m a 24 week supporter.
(Not necessarily believer. )
Talked to a bunch of women and my wife. They feel pretty strongly about this.
If Mom’s willing to kill it ?
Viable outside the womb. Too far though.
In my opinion.

Why 24 weeks? What is the difference logically between 24 weeks and 24 weeks + one day?

If you support abortion you should support it up to birth. It is the only logically consistent argument for the pro choice my body my choice crowd.

Every argument that can be made for abortion can be made for my 9 month old daughter. She’s not able to survive on her own, she cost a lot, maybe I realized I wasn’t ready for a child, she’s still not fully “developed”, etc.

24 weeks because that’s two weeks after they’ve determined some are viable outside the womb.
2 week graced period for + or - (From what I’ve read)

Once you’re viable, or get chance, you’re an other.
No longer my body
In my opinion.

Edit:
Edited response before I knew Bryson posted below.
No substantive changes though.

24 weeks because that’s two weeks after they’ve determined some are viable outside the womb.
Grace period. (From what I’ve read)

Once you’re viable, or get chance, you’re an other.
In my opinion.

That’s interesting, I can see the logic in it however for me it just brings me back the the brain dead coma patient argument. I don’t really wanna do that. What is interesting about the “viability” argument is what happens when technology improves so much that the viability of a fetus becomes earlier and earlier?

Then they gotta keep changing the law.
I’m trying to view this from a legal sense.
Moral. Everybody has their opinion.
Legal. Gets interesting and debatable.

Can you kill a potential kid ?
When can you kill a potential kid ?
When is it a kid ?
Can you kill a kid?

Then they gotta keep changing the law.
I’m trying to view this from a legal sense.
Moral. Everybody has their opinion.
Legal. Gets interesting and debatable.

Im not that smart lol so I’m having a difficult time understanding what you mean by legal? What is a legal argument for abortion?

Good question.
I can’t explain it the thing is complex. Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Somebody.
What’s the argument against it ?
Murder?

Good question.
I can’t explain it the thing is complex. Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Somebody.
What’s the argument against it ?
Murder?

Ahh I think I understand. Instead of debating whether it’s right or wrong (morality) you want to know what the mother should be charged legally if she had an abortion?

At what point.
Because it’s either murder or nothing.
Way I see it.
 when is it murder ?

Bruh

Anti abortion dude gets rekt.   Wonder who else here would say the same sh%t.

Biden’s DOJ Requests Supreme Court Block Texas Heartbeat Act, Despite Their Refusal to Intervene Last Month

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/bidens-doj-requests-supreme-court-block-texas-heartbeat-act-despite-refusal-intervene-last-month/

The Department of Justice has requested that the Supreme Court block the Texas ‘Heartbeat Act,’ even though the high court opted not to intervene just last month.

The Texas law prohibits abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, which is typically around six weeks.


Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Biden’s DOJ Requests Supreme Court Block Texas Heartbeat Act, Despite Their Refusal to Intervene Last Month

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/bidens-doj-requests-supreme-court-block-texas-heartbeat-act-despite-refusal-intervene-last-month/

The Department of Justice has requested that the Supreme Court block the Texas ‘Heartbeat Act,’ even though the high court opted not to intervene just last month.

The Texas law prohibits abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, which is typically around six weeks.


Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Block that shit 

6 weeks isn't enough to even know you are pregnant most of the time.   

DEFAMATION BY IMPLICATION: The Associated Press 'Strawmans' Project Veritas



Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Kamala Harris' AG office colluded with abortion providers while prosecuting journalist, lawyers say

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/kamala-harris-accused-colluding-abortion-provider-while-ag-california

President Kamala Harris was Attorney General of California, her office worked in tandem with abortion providers in order to pursue a criminal case against a pro-life journalist, attorneys for the journalist claimed.

Harris was California's attorney general when she prosecuted journalist David Daleiden for allegedly violating a state eavesdropping law, according to reports.  
Daleiden had obtained an unauthorized undercover video of a Planned Parenthood clinic, which Harris's office said was in violation of state law. 
Attorneys for Daleiden claim that Harris' Deputy Attorney General Johnette Jauron abused her power by providing the National Abortion Federation with a copy of the video, despite it being obtained as evidence during a 2016 raid. During this time, NAF was  involved in litigation with Daleiden.

Harris' office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A judge in May asked Jauron about the evidence, and whether she gave it to NAF. 
Jauron responded by saying that she provided the organization with the same evidence she provided to Daleiden.
Daleiden's attorneys argue that Jauron's statement implies that she gave the abortion advocacy group more than just the footage it had requested.

Critics of Harris claim her office pursued the criminal case against Daleiden because it was politically advantageous.


Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Supreme Court Announces Justices Will Hear Challenges to Texas Abortion Law

https://conservativebrief.com/supreme-court-announces-53160/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=922

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear challenges to a controversial Texas abortion law, the high court announced on Friday, making it the third abortion-related case justices will hear in their current term.
“The high court will now officially hear three major abortion cases this term: Two on Texas and Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a challenge to a Mississippi law that bans nearly all abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy,” Axios reported.

In briefs filed before the nation’s highest court, Texas officials argued that justices should reconsider the legality and constitutionality of the highly debated Roe v. Wade decision from 1973 in which the Supreme Court at the time struck down laws against abortion in all 50 states.


Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Abortions Drop By The Thousands After Texas Heartbeat Bill — Ghoulish Liberals Call It “Devastating”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/abortions-drop-thousands-texas-heartbeat-bill-ghoulish-liberals-call-devastating/

According to a new study, Abortions dropped by 50% in Texas in the month after the heartbeat bill was passed.
In August, 5,377 legal abortions were performed in Texas.


Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Abortions Drop By The Thousands After Texas Heartbeat Bill — Ghoulish Liberals Call It “Devastating”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/abortions-drop-thousands-texas-heartbeat-bill-ghoulish-liberals-call-devastating/

According to a new study, Abortions dropped by 50% in Texas in the month after the heartbeat bill was passed.
In August, 5,377 legal abortions were performed in Texas.


Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

This just in,  when you threaten people.  They start to not to the thing you are threatening them about.