There's no evidence of anti-Conservative bias on FB, YT, Twitter, Google, etc. (Read 39475 times)

groveler

I still believe in the justice system. Its one of the 3 main pillars of our society.
I'm a "Jaded Mandarin".
I don't trust our "Justice" system.
I despise our governments; federal, state, and local.

My pillars are God, Family, and America.
All backed up by Bible, guns, and loyalty.




drck1000

I'm a "Jaded Mandarin".
I don't trust our "Justice" system.
I despise our governments; federal, state, and local.

My pillars are God, Family, and America.
All backed up by Bible, guns, and loyalty.
Sounds like a type of fruit.   ;D

robtmc

Or is it that this "new generation" lowered the standard for "research"?
Come on, everyone knows Gargle, Twit, and Facef*ck info are all valid substitutes for education and experience.

Everything they need to know and have validated is there!

robtmc

#metoo

Interesting how that faded pretty quickly.
Especially after Tara Reade came forward.

Hypocrites?  Liberals, never!

drck1000

Especially after Tara Reade came forward.

Hypocrites?  Liberals, never!
Never! 

groveler

Sounds like a type of fruit.   ;D
Our Chinese friends will recognize the term.
Has nothing to do with fruit.

drck1000

Our Chinese friends will recognize the term.
Has nothing to do with fruit.
As Inspector said, I don't have friends. . .  :(

 :rofl:

changemyoil66

I still believe in the justice system. Its one of the 3 main pillars of our society.

What are the other 2?

I stopped believing in it a while ago. How many criminals get released or slaps on the wrist.  We see it in the news all the time.  Man with 12 prior convictions and 24 arrest, arrested again for X reason.

The justice system is not about being guilty or innocent anymore.  It's about if you have the money for a good lawyer.

omnigun

What are the other 2?

I stopped believing in it a while ago. How many criminals get released or slaps on the wrist.  We see it in the news all the time.  Man with 12 prior convictions and 24 arrest, arrested again for X reason.

The justice system is not about being guilty or innocent anymore.  It's about if you have the money for a good lawyer.

Legislative—Makes laws (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate)
Executive—Carries out laws (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies)
Judicial—Evaluates laws (Supreme Court and other courts)

The justice system is not perfect but we have to believe in it as a society of laws and rules.

groveler

Legislative—Makes laws (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate)
Executive—Carries out laws (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies)
Judicial—Evaluates laws (Supreme Court and other courts)

The justice system is not perfect but we have to believe in it as a society of laws and rules.
WOW!
My pillars of society are God, family, and country.
Yours are government, government, and government.
It is a brave new world, I prefer my world and repudiate yours.
enjoy your short time, it passes quickly.

Old fart wisdom.

hvybarrels

Pretending to be offended does not make you a good person.

Flapp_Jackson

Meet Your Chinese Facebook Censors

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

NY times locked out until 6 post are removed. Must be a myth.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Flapp_Jackson

NY times locked out until 6 post are removed. Must be a myth.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

For all their faults, occasionally the NYT gets something right.  They apologized after 2016 and promised to be less biased, more objective and practice good journalism.

That lasted all of about 3 days!   :wtf:

Once in a blue moon, I see a NYT story that doesn't appear biased, slanted or riddled with TDS, and I actually have to do a double take -- or even a triple!  So, I know they do have the ability to tell the truth when they want to.

If they were locked out, it's because the new gatekeepers of information in the US, Big Tech, didn't like what they posted. 

I predict the 230 protections are about the be rescinded, and the Big Tech companies are going to be treated like Congress treated MicroSoft's IE browser "monopoly."  Google controls about 97% of the search engine market.  That means, if someone like the DNC is working with Google, they can manipulate searches so only Liberal/Leftist/Progressive/Socialist sources are returned on the first few results pages.  Some Conservative sites might be included for appearances, but the really "bad" ones will be omitted or hidden around page "last".

Only 97%?  That's not a monopoly, is it?  LOL!! It's what's called a natural monopoly.  The company didn't have to drive off competition.  The mere fact that 97% of the market use their product means there's no way anyone else can jump in and take marketshare without offering some kind of interoperability with Google's applications and search engine.  How many still use Yahoo!?  Used to be the search engine leader.  Google was just better in terms of ease of use and results relevance.  Before Yahoo was AltaVista, I believe.  It had the best matching algorithms, but their overall ranking of returns sucked.  Didn't really present the most sought sites at the top.

Anyway, Big Tech is wanting to control the country -- that's painfully obvious.  If they swing this election for Biden, I hope they have a whistleblower present concrete proof, and someone goes down for election interference.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

omnigun

For all their faults, occasionally the NYT gets something right.  They apologized after 2016 and promised to be less biased, more objective and practice good journalism.

That lasted all of about 3 days!   :wtf:

Once in a blue moon, I see a NYT story that doesn't appear biased, slanted or riddled with TDS, and I actually have to do a double take -- or even a triple!  So, I know they do have the ability to tell the truth when they want to.

If they were locked out, it's because the new gatekeepers of information in the US, Big Tech, didn't like what they posted. 

I predict the 230 protections are about the be rescinded, and the Big Tech companies are going to be treated like Congress treated MicroSoft's IE browser "monopoly."  Google controls about 97% of the search engine market.  That means, if someone like the DNC is working with Google, they can manipulate searches so only Liberal/Leftist/Progressive/Socialist sources are returned on the first few results pages.  Some Conservative sites might be included for appearances, but the really "bad" ones will be omitted or hidden around page "last".

Only 97%?  That's not a monopoly, is it?  LOL!! It's what's called a natural monopoly.  The company didn't have to drive off competition.  The mere fact that 97% of the market use their product means there's no way anyone else can jump in and take marketshare without offering some kind of interoperability with Google's applications and search engine.  How many still use Yahoo!?  Used to be the search engine leader.  Google was just better in terms of ease of use and results relevance.  Before Yahoo was AltaVista, I believe.  It had the best matching algorithms, but their overall ranking of returns sucked.  Didn't really present the most sought sites at the top.

Anyway, Big Tech is wanting to control the country -- that's painfully obvious.  If they swing this election for Biden, I hope they have a whistleblower present concrete proof, and someone goes down for election interference.

So are you saying you don't support capitalism of Google making a better product and you want Regulations to break up and force people to use other products or Google to split up?

Flapp_Jackson

So are you saying you don't support capitalism of Google making a better product and you want Regulations to break up and force people to use other products or Google to split up?

Did I say ANY of that?  At all?  Once?

If not, then you have your answer.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

eyeeatingfish

Sure, they are biased towards liberals. So what? I am not going to start playing the victim card just because a social media sight doesn't share my views.

Flapp_Jackson

Sure, they are biased towards liberals. So what? I am not going to start playing the victim card just because a social media sight doesn't share my views.

That's nice, but how you feel about your views on FB is not the issue.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

eyeeatingfish

That's nice, but how you feel about your views on FB is not the issue.

I am not the one crying that the world isn't fair.

Flapp_Jackson

I am not the one crying that the world isn't fair.

Funny.  You cry all the time about this forum's members not being nice to your "alternative opinions."   :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw