Meh I think it is a sham...

Meh I think it is a sham...

Translation: "In my opinion".

You like to give personal opinions constantly, but you seldom offer your reasons for that conclusion.

WHY is this a sham?

For someone who posts ad nauseam about free speech, you seem disinterested in tech companies who have been proven to be biased against Republicans and Conservatives (we posted whistleblower accounts as proof), even though they are actively censuring the oldest newspaper in the country because we are close to an election and the story makes Biden look corrupt. 

It's probably because he IS corrupt.  More corroborating evidence has been reported to support the NY Post's article than was found for the Russia-Collusion allegations over 3+ years of it being the headline on all these Social Media "platforms".

Translation: "In my opinion".

You like to give personal opinions constantly, but you seldom offer your reasons for that conclusion.

WHY is this a sham?

For someone who posts ad nauseam about free speech, you seem disinterested in tech companies who have been proven to be biased against Republicans and Conservatives (we posted whistleblower accounts as proof), even though they are actively censuring the oldest newspaper in the country because we are close to an election and the story makes Biden look corrupt. 

It's probably because he IS corrupt.  More corroborating evidence has been reported to support the NY Post's article than was found for the Russia-Collusion allegations over 3+ years of it being the headline on all these Social Media "platforms".

I've already said this in other threads.  They have plenty of conservative content.  I don't see overwhelming proof of discrimination, facebook uses 3rd party companies to fact check.  People don't have to use Facebook.  I even posted how NY post might not be legit, and the fact they apologized.  And rectified the situation.  How would you deal with fakenews?  If facebook allows everything including russian trolls how do you disprove it?

I've already said this in other threads.  They have plenty of conservative content.  I don't see overwhelming proof of discrimination, facebook uses 3rd party companies to fact check.  People don't have to use Facebook.  I even posted how NY post might not be legit, and the fact they apologized.  And rectified the situation.  How would you deal with fakenews?  If facebook allows everything including russian trolls how do you disprove it?

You sound like the racist next door who denies he's a racist with, "I have plenty of Black friends."

Allowing Conservative content is not the issue.  When they actively censure Conservative content and rarely do so for Liberal/Progressive/Socialist content, the point becomes clear.

Selectively censuring one message and allowing another isn't remedied by "They have plenty of conservative content. "

And if you "don't see overwhelming proof of discrimination", it tells me you didn't look at any of the EVIDENCE and PROOF posted on those other threads.

No surprise.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/28/senators-doom-scrolling-twitter-fundraising-433311

this is why he and the Dems back social media

“When you’re on especially Twitter, all you’re doing is worrying or getting enraged. All you’re doing is doom-scrolling,” Schatz said. “And this is a way to channel that anxiety into something constructive for the country.”

Murphy and Schatz — ages 47 and 48, respectively — emphasized in interviews this week that Democrats will not win back the Senate without competing in states where Republicans have historically dominated. Using their influence on Twitter to their advantage, the senators started elevating what were widely considered to be second- and third-tier races to the top of the party’s list; the outcomes of those same races are likely to determine which party controls the Senate come 2021.

social media is just that. Emotionally driven. And our country is falling for it.

You sound like the racist next door who denies he's a racist with, "I have plenty of Black friends."

Allowing Conservative content is not the issue.  When they actively censure Conservative content and rarely do so for Liberal/Progressive/Socialist content, the point becomes clear.

Selectively censuring one message and allowing another isn't remedied by "They have plenty of conservative content. "

And if you "don't see overwhelming proof of discrimination", it tells me you didn't look at any of the EVIDENCE and PROOF posted on those other threads.

No surprise.

And you sound like the neighbor screaming the moon landing was fake.   Not everything is a conspiracy theory.  A few cases of "leaks"  is not proof. 
Do you have proof they not policing the other side or is it because you don't see that side you don't know what's happening?   Or maybe that the Russian trolls are only focusing on making fake conservative news.  I do agree there might be a slight bias but not one that deserves to take away 230.   Worst case just use a different site...

And you sound like the neighbor screaming the moon landing was fake.   Not everything is a conspiracy theory.  A few cases of "leaks"  is not proof. 
Do you have proof they not policing the other side or is it because you don't see that side you don't know what's happening?   Or maybe that the Russian trolls are only focusing on making fake conservative news.  I do agree there might be a slight bias but not one that deserves to take away 230.   Worst case just use a different site...

You're a useful idiot of the Dems.  You've testified to that fact already.

You didn't do any research into the "leaks", but you won't let that stop you from dismissing it.

Conspiracy Theory?  You have only to see the WikiLeaks DNC emails to know the Democrats conspire with the media, including the big tech giants who regularly donate massive cash to Democrats and their causes.

It's not a "theory" after it's proven.

And you sound like the neighbor screaming the moon landing was fake.   Not everything is a conspiracy theory.  A few cases of "leaks"  is not proof. 
Do you have proof they not policing the other side or is it because you don't see that side you don't know what's happening?   Or maybe that the Russian trolls are only focusing on making fake conservative news.  I do agree there might be a slight bias but not one that deserves to take away 230.   Worst case just use a different site...

Do u have proof the moon landing was real? Or just what TV showed u.

#tinfoil

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Do u have proof the moon landing was real? Or just what TV showed u.

#tinfoil

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

The thing about conspiracy theories is, the more people needed to keep a secret, the less likely it is to be kept secret.

The number of people involved in a very public moon launch and recovery make it highly unlikely anything as big as that supposed cover-up would have remained a theory all these years.  Someone's diary or evidence would have surfaced already.

I've already said this in other threads.  They have plenty of conservative content.  I don't see overwhelming proof of discrimination, facebook uses 3rd party companies to fact check.  People don't have to use Facebook.  I even posted how NY post might not be legit, and the fact they apologized.  And rectified the situation.  How would you deal with fakenews?  If facebook allows everything including russian trolls how do you disprove it?

twitter has yet to allow links to the story and the NYPost account is still locked...

twitter has yet to allow links to the story and the NYPost account is still locked...

Dorsey today said, "All the NY Post has to do is log into their account, DELETE the original story, and upload the same story again.

Why does a NEWS AGENCY have to jump through hoops by deleting something that by even Twitter's account was "mistakenly" blocked.

You know Twitter must have to ability to unblock the account without deleting the original flagged upload.  They are just turning it around on the user instead of taking care of the problem as they should.

The longer the Post's account is blocked, the more of damages they can claim in a lawsuit.  Dorsey already said it was a mistake -- i.e. their fault.  Why did Twitter not directly contact the New York Post and assist them with unlocking their account?  A mistake of this magnitude should be followed up with above normal customer support.

Dorsey today said, "All the NY Post has to do is log into their account, DELETE the original story, and upload the same story again.

Why does a NEWS AGENCY have to jump through hoops by deleting something that by even Twitter's account was "mistakenly" blocked.

You know Twitter must have to ability to unblock the account without deleting the original flagged upload.  They are just turning it around on the user instead of taking care of the problem as they should.

The longer the Post's account is blocked, the more of damages they can claim in a lawsuit.  Dorsey already said it was a mistake -- i.e. their fault.  Why did Twitter not directly contact the New York Post and assist them with unlocking their account?  A mistake of this magnitude should be followed up with above normal customer support.

twitter has yet to allow links to the story and the NYPost account is still locked...

You should know how in IT things just aren't designed to be that easy most of the time.   If it wasn't designed to originally do it probably wont do it.

You should know how in IT things just aren't designed to be that easy most of the time.   If it wasn't designed to originally do it probably wont do it.

Bullshit.

That needs to be auto-added when I rely to you!

Anyone who knows software knows how to change a field in a database to change the status of a post, an account or whatever.  It's not a mystery.

I've made systems work that I had zero experience operating by tracing from the application to the objects they access and the entities they read and key off of.  Changing that field changes the status of the attribute, hence the specific row in an object.

My whole career was as a designer, tester, configuration manager, problem solver, programmer, database designer and administrator, and systems engineer.

I'm "anyone who knows software."  You're wrong.

If the account was unlocked before, the associated status fields can be changed BACK to make it unlocked again.  If there's no GUI for this, and it's a valid use case, then the system was poorly designed, but that doesn't mean it can't be updated at the DBM level.

Do u have proof the moon landing was real? Or just what TV showed u.

#tinfoil

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Oh no. Here we go...