I recall one angle was who had authority to change procedures.  The State leg, not some elections official, Sec of State, etc.  Rules. . .

While I occasionally get energized by the "evidence" I see friends sharing, I don't think there will be some tide shift.  I do hope that more evidence of misconduct comes up for many who thought they already got away with things.

Yeah, I’m not sure there is going to be enough for there to be a tide shift either. I have to give it to Trump. He is not going down without a fight. We’lol just have to see how it plays out.

I seriously doubt that SCOTUS will have the cojones to invalidate suspect state results... all but Alito and Thomas are squishes (I'm guessing on Barrett). I hope I'm wrong and that the Trump lawsuits have sufficient evidence to cast serious enough doubts that invalidation would be the correct legal action.

I’m with you on this. I would not be surprised if SCOTUS refuses to hear some of the cases. It is their way of weaseling out.

At least your consistent in life. 
 

Half might be blanks 

At least your consistent in life. 
 

Please don’t tell my wife! 

The Great Lakes Justice Center has filed lawsuits (mentioned above) re irregularities in the Michigan election.

Here is their website article re this lawsuit with links to the actual complaint [https://www.greatlakesjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Complaint-Costantino-FINAL-With-Exhibits.pdf] and the motion for a temporary restraining order [https://www.greatlakesjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Motion-for-TRO-Brief-Order-Costantino.pdf] against the state certifying the vote totals.

https://www.greatlakesjc.org/cases/costantino_v_detroit/

The Great Lakes Justice Center had the privilege of representing Mrs. Costantino and Mr. McCall, Jr. in their lawsuit against Wayne County for election fraud.

Full Case Name: Cheryl A. Costantino and Edward P. McCall, Jr. v. City of Detroit
File No.:
Court: Wayne County Circuit Court
Great Lakes Justice Center Role: Representing Plaintiffs.
Date: November 8, 2020.

Summary

The Great Lakes Justice Center (GLJC) filed an action in Wayne County Circuit Court alleging massive fraud in the election vote-counting procedures. The suit states Wayne County election officials allowed illegal, unlawful, and fraudulent processing of votes cast in last Tuesday’s election. Numerous witnesses have filed sworn affidavits under oath attesting to the fraudulent activities they observed directly. These acts disenfranchised lawful voters and potentially changed the outcome of the election. The various acts of fraud are itemized in the Complaint. The Complaint alleges:

Violation of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional right to Election Accuracy and Integrity.
Violation of Plaintiffs’ Quo Warranto right to a fraud-free Election.
Violation of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional Equal Protection Rights.
Violation of Statutory Election Laws.

Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges many illegal and fraudulent actions by Defendants. For example:

Ballots were counted even though the voter’s name did not appear in the official voter rolls.
Election workers were ordered to not verify voters’ signatures on absentee ballots, to backdate absentee ballots, and to process such ballots regardless of their validity.
Election workers processed ballots that appeared after the election deadline and falsely reported that those ballots had been received prior to November 3, 2020 deadline.
Defendants used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names into the QVF and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate of 1/1/1900.
Defendants coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. Election workers would go to the voting booths with voters to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.
Unsecured ballots arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed ballot boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes.
Defendants refused to record challenges to their processes and removed challengers from the site if they politely voiced a challenge.

One man's view of the goals of the lawsuits being brought and the possible outcomes. 13 minutes, includes two one minute promotions.

Yeah, I’m not sure there is going to be enough for there to be a tide shift either. I have to give it to Trump. He is not going down without a fight. We’lol just have to see how it plays out.

Interesting what he's doing with staff changes in the last week. 

Esper is one that I'm not surprised with though. . .

One man's view of the goals of the lawsuits being brought and the possible outcomes. 13 minutes, includes two one minute promotions.

[SNIP]

Awesome video!  This guy is up on his knowledge of how our elections work. There may be hope for us after all.

Thanks!

Interesting what he's doing with staff changes in the last week. 

Esper is one that I'm not surprised with though. . .

I have not kept up with what is going on with staff changes other than Esper which was expected. I’ll have to do a little research. I have the time. The problem is I am having a really tough time trying to decide what to shoot today. I’m so confused... 

Interesting what he's doing with staff changes in the last week. 

Esper is one that I'm not surprised with though. . .

After a little study, I’m not sure I see anything out of the ordinary as far as staff changes are concerned for the Trump administration. Here is why:

I see Trump as a no non nonsense narcissist. I think he gives you a chance to do what he wants. HIS WAY OR THE HIGHWAY. Take it or leave it. He micromanages most things that I see. Not necessarily the best leadership style as it doesn’t allow for people to do their jobs and grow into their position. I think he doesn’t micromanage people he trusts. And he doesn’t trust many people. This is exactly why he has surrounded himself with his family. They are allowed to do their jobs the way they see fit but they also protect him from those who cannot be trusted. Once you earn the family’s trust you are given free rein. But if you get their distrust you are given the choice of resign or being fired. And micro managers don’t keep people for very long or they don’t last long themselves. I believe this is why we see so much turnover in his administration. And I don’t see anything nefarious or out of the usual for Trump.

This is really all conjecture on my part. Just uneducated opinion. What do you see that is so interesting? I am very curious.  Thanks!

I'm not contending that this is "evidence", but that it is a "data point" that could indicate something to be further investigated that will yield concrete evidence of how such an anomalie could exist other than by "coincidence".

[Steve Bannon: "There are no conspiracies, but there are no coincidences either."]

[The "People's Pundit", polling data analyst Richard Baris, has now been censored by all the major social media (he's on Parler now).]

Here is the MIT PhD from the video above (reply #152) offering each campaign the opportunity to check his math.

"Potential problems" with the Dominion voting systems. There are many analyses of data showing "anomalies" in tabulation and totals. Those will be presented in court. Here are some general issues.

1. Votes can theoretically be ignored for individuals if a straight ticket vote is selected. This setting could very welI enable “Republican”-style typo fraud. Many complex rules decide how the “straight ticket” option works.
2. Network Security is very weak since all software access keys use the same cryptographic pair. This gives plausible deniability to whoever potentially decides to mess around with voting settings. It cant be proven who changed a setting since everybody has the same key
3. Digital certificates are not protected by password, and Dominion user manual explicitly says not to enter a password. This enables potential for bad actors to MITM attack data traveling over network between precinct tabulator and central tabulator.
4. Cryptic “split rotation” function that features the ability to “force a maximum deviation”. There is no definition of a “split rotation”, so we cannot know what “force a maximum deviation” means in this instance.
5. Local IT guys have ultimate power to clandestinely change settings, thus having the ability to potentially alter an entire election. There are no checks and balances or observers of the local IT guy when he accesses machine debug and admin settings. Its unclear if logs exist.
6. Dominion is a black box with votes ultimately tabulated in a central server system. Who has access to the central server and where is the manual and security reviews of that server software?
7. Settings could theoretically have been changed during evening downtime on first night of voting. Much easier to change settings on hundreds of machines than to forge thousands of ballots. A couple of people could have done it quickly.
8. State of Pennsylvania requested semantic changes to the Dominion voting software, possibly to aid in their lawfare efforts. The word “Cast” became “Print”, obfuscating the moment when your vote becomes officially cast. For what reason is currently unknown.
9. There is an option to force the vote scanner to “overrun” a preset amount of ballots EVERY time anybody pauses the scan mid-batch. “Overrun” is undefined. Potential for abuse is high with this function, which was added shortly after 2018 mid-term elections.

Full story:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-one-many-heroes-uncovers-damning-evidence-regarding-potential-fraud-within-dominion-voting-machines/

Read the lawsuit filed by the Trump campaign against Michigan and Wayne County. Any credible evidence therein?

https://www.scribd.com/document/483888883/Michigan-lawsuit#download&from_embed

After a little study, I’m not sure I see anything out of the ordinary as far as staff changes are concerned for the Trump administration. Here is why:

I see Trump as a no non nonsense narcissist. I think he gives you a chance to do what he wants. HIS WAY OR THE HIGHWAY. Take it or leave it. He micromanages most things that I see. Not necessarily the best leadership style as it doesn’t allow for people to do their jobs and grow into their position. I think he doesn’t micromanage people he trusts. And he doesn’t trust many people. This is exactly why he has surrounded himself with his family. They are allowed to do their jobs the way they see fit but they also protect him from those who cannot be trusted. Once you earn the family’s trust you are given free rein. But if you get their distrust you are given the choice of resign or being fired. And micro managers don’t keep people for very long or they don’t last long themselves. I believe this is why we see so much turnover in his administration. And I don’t see anything nefarious or out of the usual for Trump.

This is really all conjecture on my part. Just uneducated opinion. What do you see that is so interesting? I am very curious.  Thanks!

I'd have to look at the list again, but Esper was one that while I wasn't surprised that he was fired, my thoughts were why just after the election and two months left.  Yeah, a lot can happen in 2 months and that is one job that I believe doesn't hinge on one person (lots of backup, asst & under sec, etc).  However, the shake up of other positions left me scratching my head.  That said, those moves did start up a hornets nest with the Dem and media, so. . .

Guess there's fraud on both sides.
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-supporter-voter-fraud-president-viral-video-1546876

Though this was last year, and she was caught.  Just showing that the system works.

Dead (for three years) woman's signature match is valid according to the registrar of voters so her mail-in vote was counted, even though her husband did not receive her ballot at their address.



See the tweet from Richard Grenell with the embedded local news station story:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1326212952148627456

There's also level of "accuracy" set for the signature match.  I know my sig that I sent in on the card was awful and likely different from the ballot one.  But according to the website, my ballot was received and counted "properly".