4600 is not mass fraud.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/americans-arent-stupid-americans-still-believe-democrats-biden-cheated-win-2020-election/

Most Americans Still Believe Democrats and Biden Cheated to Win 2020 Election


Rasmussen Polls.

A majority (51%) of voters believe it is likely that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, including 35% who say it’s Very Likely cheating affected the election.



29% of Likely U.S. Voters say laws requiring photo identification at the polls discriminate against some voters. Sixty-two percent (62%) say voter ID laws don’t discriminate

When you scream that mail in votes should be avoided as a party platform and tell everyone to vote in person....you tend to get what you ask for.

You still don't get it.

The integrity of the vote is the issue, NOT the outcome.

If mail-in voting is significantly more susceptible to fraud and illegal counting than in-person, then how can you honestly and rationally say that the mail-in numbers are legit?

I trust the in-person numbers way more than the mail-in numbers.  That's the issue.

And you keep saying "you get what you ask for."  That also applies to low-integrity, highly illegal vote counts under the mail-in system.  The Democrats asked for it, and they won with it.  So, yeah, keep parroting the "you get what you ask for" nonsense.  The majority was against universal mail-in, because they all know it's ripe for corruption and stealing of elections.

But, you do you.

You still don't get it.

The integrity of the vote is the issue, NOT the outcome.

If mail-in voting is significantly more susceptible to fraud and illegal counting than in-person, then how can you honestly and rationally say that the mail-in numbers are legit?

I trust the in-person numbers way more than the mail-in numbers.  That's the issue.

And you keep saying "you get what you ask for."  That also applies to low-integrity, highly illegal vote counts under the mail-in system.  The Democrats asked for it, and they won with it.  So, yeah, keep parroting the "you get what you ask for" nonsense.  The majority was against universal mail-in, because they all know it's ripe for corruption and stealing of elections.

But, you do you.

Hawaii and many other states have had very successful mail-in voting for years.  There is no mass fraud.  Either way.  Just because technically something could happen does not mean it actually happens.

Hawaii and many other states have had very successful mail-in voting for years.  There is no mass fraud.  Either way.  Just because technically something could happen does not mean it actually happens.

"FOR YEARS" being the operative words. 

The states that swung the election for Biden instituted universal mail-in voting within months, maybe 1 year, before the election was held.  They based ballot dissemination on voter roles that were wrong for years and years and with no effort to clean them up prior to mailing ballots. 

New Jersey tried the do a mail-in election, and the thing became such a mess, the courts told them they had to hold another election.  The mess they created was beyond any remedy other than a do-over.

If you want to do a comparison between states, let's use New Jersey.  Hawaii is in another category, having had time to already work out the kinks before the 2020 election.

Worth listening to, Big Tech literally buying the 2020 election and a bunch of laws they paid people to break.

https://justthenews.com/podcasts/john-solomon-reports/phill-kline-zuckerbergs-voter-manipulation

Worth listening to, Big Tech literally buying the 2020 election and a bunch of laws they paid people to break.

https://justthenews.com/podcasts/john-solomon-reports/phill-kline-zuckerbergs-voter-manipulation

Technically, corporation's are people,  people have free speech.  Money is speech.

Platitudes are poor substitute for knowledge, keep on trucking with those low information hot takes.

Platitudes are poor substitute for knowledge, keep on trucking with those low information hot takes.

Can't hide from truth.  Until you change the laws or take away rights from corporations.   What they are doing is perfectly legal. 

  low info voters we have at least one here. votes with Paypal

'Its Perfectly legal' he said without ever listening to a podcast talking about judges ruling these tactics were not legal, violated the law and handed down decent decrees prohibiting them from ever being done again.

Such informed insight...

Can't hide from truth.  Until you change the laws or take away rights from corporations.   What they are doing is perfectly legal.

What some of the swing states did was NOT perfectly legal.  One tried to go through the legislature to change the election process and failed, so they just did it anyway.  The US Constitution gives the LEGISLATURES of the states the power to decide on election rules.  They illegally used the pandemic emergency powers to circumvent the law.

Then there were others who had, by October 2019, pushed through mail-in voting, long before the pandemic.  Why?  Because they all know the system is flawed and allows for cheating and covering it up.  Can't argue "Pandemic!!" in those cases.

Everyone since Carter was president has expressed concerns that mail-in voting is totally susceptible to voter fraud and election stealing.  But somehow NOW it's as secure as in-person voting?

You Liberals are so gullible.

'Its Perfectly legal' he said without ever listening to a podcast talking about judges ruling these tactics were not legal, violated the law and handed down decent decrees prohibiting them from ever being done again.

Such informed insight...

Those are two different matters. 

Big tech "buying" elections = legal. 

The states changing voting laws = (unknown).   Verdict is not out on the former.  I'll wait till the supreme court rules.

What some of the swing states did was NOT perfectly legal.  One tried to go through the legislature to change the election process and failed, so they just did it anyway.  The US Constitution gives the LEGISLATIONS of the states the power to decide on election rules.  They illegally used the pandemic emergency powers to circumvent the law.

Then there were others who had, by October 2019, pushed through mail-in voting, long before the pandemic.  Why?  Because they all know the system is flawed and allows for cheating and covering it up.  Can't argue "Pandemic!!" in those cases.

Everyone since Carter was president has expressed concerns that mail-in voting is totally susceptible to voter fraud and election stealing.  But somehow NOW it's as secure as in-person voting?

You Liberals are so gullible.

*independents*

You conservatives are so gullible.  If you read what I wrote I made no mention to state voting laws. 

*independents*

You conservatives are so gullible.  If you read what I wrote I made no mention to state voting laws.

You made no attempt to counter any facts.  Just more argumentative and ad hominem BS.

 

You made no attempt to counter any facts.  Just more argumentative and ad hominem BS.

 

No I prefer for verdicts on matters of something this divisive to be heard at the supreme court.   They are far more qualified than myself or anyone here.  I do find it interesting that you don't want to admit I was correct on big tech though so you focus on anything else you think you can use to win the argument.

Still waiting for all the jazz about how unsecure mail in voting, to show actual mass fraud  Until then you are only arguing possibilities and not fact.

No I prefer for verdicts on matters of something this divisive to be heard at the supreme court.   They are far more qualified than myself or anyone here.  I do find it interesting that you don't want to admit I was correct on big tech though so you focus on anything else you think you can use to win the argument.

Still waiting for all the jazz about how unsecure mail in voting, to show actual mass fraud  Until then you are only arguing possibilities and not fact.

Nobody cares what you "prefer".  If the facts are the facts, and you need some higher authority to tell you, then you're just a denier -- pure and simple.

Once again, this thread  has become all about OMNIGUN and what he believes and prefers.   

Nobody cares what you "prefer".  If the facts are the facts, and you need some higher authority to tell you, then you're just a denier -- pure and simple.

You don't get to make up laws or interpret them.   The courts do that.   Just cause you or someone thinks they know what the constitution or laws mean doesn't make it true.

You don't get to make up laws or interpret them.   The courts do that.   Just cause you or someone thinks they know what the constitution or laws mean doesn't make it true.

We could say the same about 90%+ of your unsupported BS comments.

Why can't you stay on topic?  It's not the OmniGun thread!