https://www.healthdigest.com/307112/the-truth-about-mrna-vaccines/

I'm probably wrong but I like to error on the side of caution

from your link
It is critical to understand that the mRNA does not enter your cell's nucleus and thus doesn't affect or alter your unique DNA.

https://www.newswars.com/mrna-vaccines-might-prove-catastrophic-in-a-rushed-coronavirus-response/

I might be aware of all the technology, I'm just saying be cautious.

from your link
"Five risks of mRNA vaccines"
none of which are mRNA combine with your DNA...

and please site a source more reputable than humansarefree.com next time...

The problem with modern science is that so much of the data is manipulated for profit that even the reputable journals have just as much credibility as the crackpot nature sites.

Also I think you are splitting hairs here with your definitions. This is an experimental drug that messes with your genetic code

what people do not realize that the federal government is responsible for the vaccine being produced and distributed
the states are responsible for the vaccination procedure itself
the states were told over the summer and in the fall to have their plans ready, and they were not ready when the time came
the holidays and the surge did not help either

the vaccination rate has already increased to over 1 million a day nationwide
so biden's plan to give 100 million doses in 100 days will not be a result of his doing
but TDS/MSM will give all credit to sleepy joe...

He did say one thing, instead of holding back the 2nd dose to give that out and pressure the manufactures to make enough in 30 days time to cover.   The federal government can also procure more vaccine doses.  But you are correct its largely a state effort other than that.

Sorry to panic anyone but I came from a time of gene splicing and mapping was prominent. I'm just saying be cautious. I apologize once again.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Further reading on the subject.

https://biologydictionary.net/mrna/

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

The problem with modern science is that so much of the data is manipulated for profit that even the reputable journals have just as much credibility as the crackpot nature sites.

Also I think you are splitting hairs here with your definitions. This is an experimental drug that messes with your genetic code

not splitting hairs
mRNA does not enter the nucleus, it works in the ribosomes, which are in the cytoplasm
that's basic science...

He did say one thing, instead of holding back the 2nd dose to give that out and pressure the manufactures to make enough in 30 days time to cover.   The federal government can also procure more vaccine doses.  But you are correct its largely a state effort other than that.

false
all vaccine doses are already presold through summer at least...

He did say one thing, instead of holding back the 2nd dose to give that out and pressure the manufactures to make enough in 30 days time to cover.   The federal government can also procure more vaccine doses.  But you are correct its largely a state effort other than that.

you don't think that manufacturers aren't already making it as fast as they can?
i guess you are an "economist at heart" too...

false
all vaccine doses are already presold through summer at least...

Even the other vaccines around the world?  Not sure if any companies can increase production either. 

Even the other vaccines around the world?  Not sure if any companies can increase production either.

so you made a claim without actually knowing any facts at all?
typical...

.

.

I don't think the dot thing is having its intended effect.

Just ignore him.  He's not even worth the 3 seconds it takes to reply with a single dot.

PERIOD!   

not splitting hairs
mRNA does not enter the nucleus, it works in the ribosomes, which are in the cytoplasm
that's basic science...

The real issue of concern is unwanted consequence of reprogramming your body to produce proteins in order to stimulate an immune reaction with an experimental drug. What will those new proteins do after a few months? What other effects will the fake RNA have? Nobody has the slightest clue.

so you made a claim without actually knowing any facts at all?
typical...

Not really...Knowing the final details vs knowing whats possible are 2 different things.  They can build more factories etc,  approve other vaccines.   The possibilities are there.

The real issue of concern is unwanted consequence of reprogramming your body to produce proteins in order to stimulate an immune reaction with an experimental drug. What will those new proteins do after a few months? What other effects will the fake RNA have? Nobody has the slightest clue.

nobody is questioning that we don't know the long term effects, i even said that earlier
the claim is that mRNA alters your DNA, and it does not
you are not "reprogramming your body"

nobody is questioning that we don't know the long term effects, i even said that earlier
the claim is that mRNA alters your DNA, and it does not
you are not "reprogramming your body"

M in mRNA stands for Messenger, and when you side-load a new genetic code it counts as a reprogramming.This is far different from the traditional vaccine approach of introducing an inert pathogen in order to stimulate a natural immune response.

I don't think the dot thing is having its intended effect.

Just I resolve to ignore him.  He's not even worth the 3 seconds it takes to reply with a single dot.

PERIOD!   

FIFY

deyago

M in mRNA stands for Messenger, and when you side-load a new genetic code it counts as a reprogramming.This is far different from the traditional vaccine approach of introducing an inert pathogen in order to stimulate a natural immune response.

in your body, mRNA is a messenger FROM your DNA to the ribosomes
it reprograms NOTHING
it is not genetic code...