Then I would get tested if there was a genetic test.  But I took the risk getting the vaccine already for both myself and for the sake for others.  I was an early tester for the vaccine.

How would it be fake news?  With current facts and estimates based on science we have the current information. If that changes, the news changes with it.  No conspiracy.  No fake news.

https://www.statnews.com/2021/04/13/u-s-urges-pause-on-use-of-johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-after-rare-blood-clotting-cases/

6.8 million doses administered.  6 people had clots that we know of so far.  1 in 1 million chances with current information is 100% accurate.

dude, you should quit while you are behind
i explained in SEVERAL posts why both the numerator and denominator are WRONG

Billy Preston - Will It Go Round In Circles



Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Apparently Denmark doesn't care about the SAFETY!!! of its citizens, and will allow them to die rather than be injected with the AstraZeneca vaccine. You'd think that for a vaccine that only has a 1 in a million chance of a particular serious medical issue (as claimed by most of the U.S. public health "experts" appearing on CNN and MSNBC) that would be a high price to pay for banning the "jab", as they apparently like to call it in Europe.

Also, can someone please post the headlines and stories about half the people in Texas being either hospitalized or dead, as predicted by those same public health experts a month ago when Texas opened up completely and did away with all mandatory "mitigation measures" (masks, "social distancing", gathering size limits, limited business occupancy, etc.). I guess somehow I've missed all those stories, so would appreciate some help fear-mongering.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/denmark-permanently-bans-astrazeneca-jab-over-blood-clots

Denmark Permanently Bans AstraZeneca Jab Over Blood Clots As EU Tops 100M Vaccinations

As the US's decision to discontinue the Johnson & Johnson vaccine provokes a new scrutiny for all vaccines based on adenovirus-vector platform, Denmark, one of the most critical countries in Europe when it comes to vaccine safety, has just declared that it will permanently ban AstraZeneca's coronavirus vaccine following a safety review.

The decision to ban the jab was taken after it was reportedly linked to several serious reactions involving blood clots and bleeding in patients with low blood platelet counts, according to Berlingske.

The vaccine was originally put on hold on March 11 when a 60-year-old Danish woman died shortly after receiving the vaccine. She died with a very unique disease picture, where she was both affected by internal bleeding, a very low platelet count and blood clots. Roughly three dozen similar cases have been reported across the EU.

Cerebral blood clots were characterized as a very rare side effect, the result of random immune system reactions to the adenovirus jabs - or at least that's what a team of doctors suggested yesterday.

No vid of the denmark spokes person passing out and dying during the speech?

but "the science" says they are a genetic disorder that can be tested for...

immune system reactions are genetic...what??? 

AND you can test for many immune system issues.

No vid of the denmark spokes person passing out and dying during the speech?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Billy Preston - Will It Go Round In Circles



Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

#fearthevaccine
#ohwaitnvm

https://www.wsj.com/articles/serious-blood-clots-are-more-likely-in-covid-19-sufferers-than-in-those-who-got-vaccine-study-finds-11618510158

U.S. officials have recommended a pause in the administration of the single-dose
Covid-19 vaccine developed by Johnson & Johnson JNJ 0.29% as they study
a possible link between the shot and a very small number of instances of severe
blood clotting. The Oxford study didn’t look at patient
data for recipients of the J&J shot.

They cautioned, however, against putting too much stock in the specific findings of the
relative risks of Covid-infected and general populations or varying risks among vaccines.
They said the data used was too limited for statistically valid comparisons of CVT
occurrence among recipients of different vaccines or with the general population.

The Oxford scientists said other limits of the data include the rarity of the clotting in all groups
and the inclusion of children in the U.S. data set. The data review also didn’t shed light on the
cause of clots or mechanisms in the virus or vaccines that might overlap or contribute to clots.

#fearthevaccine
#ohwaitnvm

https://www.wsj.com/articles/serious-blood-clots-are-more-likely-in-covid-19-sufferers-than-in-those-who-got-vaccine-study-finds-11618510158