So the Chinese invented Weaponized Heart Attacks and Strokes. Glad you gave them the research money for that Fauci.


COVID-19 Is a Vascular Disease: Coronavirus’ Spike Protein Attacks Vascular System on a Cellular Level


https://scitechdaily.com/covid-19-is-a-vascular-disease-coronavirus-spike-protein-attacks-vascular-system-on-a-cellular-level/

Here is Dr. Campbell summarizing his interview with Dr. Lawrie re the effectiveness of ivermectin for both prophylaxis and treatment of the infected. Followed by the interview itself.

The evidence is so overwhelming that ivermectin "works", that Dr. Lawrie believes it would be unethical to do a randomized controlled trial and withhold the ivermectin from the placebo group, since they would suffer more severe cases of the disease and more deaths.

Dr Lawrie, Ivermectin video, Short Precis (23 minutes)

[some of Dr. Campbell's notes of the info from Dr. Lawrie]:

Out of 1,000 deaths
Ivermectin group, 27 deaths out of 1,000 cases
Placebo group, 82 deaths out of 903 cases

65% reduction

P = 0.002

Findings of RCT was the same as observational studies

Useful in all stages of the disease

88% reductions in infection rates

And mild and moderate disease to reduce viral load, so disease worsening decreased

WHO, 100, 12mg tabs $2.90 [6 to 10 tablets required per patient = 17 to 29 CENTS per patient... now compare that cost to remdesivir or the "vaccines"]

Protection from infection in workers and contacts

Ivermectin group, 25 out of 1,397 got covid

Control group, 386 out of 833 got covid

Risk reduction 93% reduction in infection rates

Or 87% with the best study taken out

Ivermectin reduces the risk of death from COVID-19 -a rapid review and meta-analysis in support of the recommendation of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.

https://www.researchgate.net/publicat...​

Kory P, Meduri GU, Iglesias J, et al. Review of the emerging evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ivermectin in the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. 18 Dec 2020.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-co...​

World Health Organization. 21st Model List of Essential Medicines. Geneva, Switzerland. 2019.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/it...​

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.0 Cochrane, 2019.
www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

The GRADE Working Group. GRADE [website] 2020
 www.gradeworkinggroup.org.

Alam MT, Murshed R, Gomes PF, Masud ZM, Saber S, Chaklader MA, Khanam F, Hossain M, Momen ABIM, Yasmin N, Alam RF, Sultana A, Robin RC. Ivermectin as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for COVID-19 among Healthcare Providers in a Selected Tertiary Hospital in Dhaka – An Observational Study

A comment [by Dr. campbell]: The unscientific nature of what's happening with the global COVID narrative is forcing people to have to consider conspiracy as it just doesn't make sense. Incompetence can only go so far before we have to consider intentionality.



actual interview (31 minutes) EDIT: this is a 23 minute followup interview with Dr. Lawrie, not the original one hour interview):

Speaking of therapeutics (ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, etc.)... why did you kill grandma Dr. Fauci?

https://trialsitenews.com/texas-physician-researchers-case-series-finds-reduction-in-covid-19-hospitalization-by-87-6-death-74-9/

Texas Physician/Researchers Case Series Finds Reduction in COVID-19 Hospitalization by 87.6% & Death 74.9%

A group of Texas-based providers, including physicians, some highly published, recently published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science results of a case series type of study involving a group of 320 COVID-19 patients deemed high risk—that is, over 50 years old with at least one comorbidity. The group actually was able to add 549 cases more by the end of the study period, which was December, 2020. This group of physicians, part of a small but vocal and dedicated camp, declare that during the pandemic, the medical profession disappointed, turning into “watchful watchers” for the vast majority of COVID-19 cases—and especially those cases that fit the study patient category—desperately needing care. The authors argue that in far too many cases, these at risk patients were acknowledged to have COVID-19, sent home, and told to return if symptoms worsened. Many people lost parents and grandparents due to this form of doctoring, which could be classified by one point of view as the active caring wing but yet by a mainstream as rogue. This study is observational in nature (e.g. isn’t a randomized controlled trial) for the practitioners that provided the care as well as the framework for studious review and analysis of associated data—and results for them that matter. Based on the results, it most certainly did for the patients as well. Using a protocol of zinc, hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin and one antibiotic (azithromycin, doxycycline, ceftriaxone) in combination with inhaled budesonide and/or intramuscular dexamethasone, the doctors, including accomplished researchers, such as Dr. Peter McCullough who have presented on TrialSite Podcast,  sought to follow the Hippocratic oath and care for their COVID-19 patients—opting to take action and not passively stand by and do nothing. They found a lot of misleading information circulating about, and ambulatory patients with some risk factors during the pandemic actually were facing great risk. While the introduction of emergency use monoclonal antibodies (Lilly and Regeneron) helped care for more of this class of patient, they still were not reaching enough patients—too many were dying. The results of their observational, case series—based comparison study to the Cleveland Clinic COVID-19 hospitalization calculator as applied to four Texas counties where they practice—were notable. The early ambulatory treatment regimen was associated with estimated 87.6% reduction in hospitalization and 74.9% reduction in death (p<0.0001)[i.e. one in 10,000 possibility that the results are chance].

Vaccines do wah?

https://www.timesofisrael.com/only-13-new-covid-cases-diagnosed-in-24-hours-lowest-in-14-months/

Vaccines do wah?

https://www.timesofisrael.com/only-13-new-covid-cases-diagnosed-in-24-hours-lowest-in-14-months/

Key word: diagnosed.

How many are infected and asymptomatic?  Of have milder symptoms due to the vaccine (your hypothesis) but go undiagnosed as the infected do not seek testing or treatment?

How about the warmer temps causing fewer infections?

You and your one-factor causality.

Vaccines do wah?

https://www.timesofisrael.com/only-13-new-covid-cases-diagnosed-in-24-hours-lowest-in-14-months/

says the guy who never even looked at PCR doubling and the changed definition of "cases" during covid 19...

Key word: diagnosed.

How many are infected and asymptomatic?  Of have milder symptoms due to the vaccine (your hypothesis) but go undiagnosed as the infected do not seek testing or treatment?

How about the warmer temps causing fewer infections?

You and your one-factor causality.

he has one factor until called out, then he adds weather and "other factors"...

Russia turns to China for help in producing COVID-19 vaccine

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/russia-turns-china-help-producing-covid-19-vaccine?utm_source=justthenews.com&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Key word: diagnosed.

How many are infected and asymptomatic?  Of have milder symptoms due to the vaccine (your hypothesis) but go undiagnosed as the infected do not seek testing or treatment?

How about the warmer temps causing fewer infections?

You and your one-factor causality.

The whole point of the vaccine is to slow or stop spread and eliminate hospitalizations.  Vaccines appear to be working perfectly.   California and other states are warm too....science  is not out yet on the other factors but I'm sure that's something there,  but hard to comment on. 

"working perfectly"? LOL.

Minor suggested "correction", I believe it would be more accurate to say "the spike proteins the mRNA drugs cause your body to produce".

so LtGov said we won't reach herd immunity because not enough people getting vaxd - aren't those that recovered from the Covid part of the herd?

Hilarious article in the highly prestigious New York Times about moving the goalposts and purported scientists saying the opposite of what they said earlier. No herd immunity, therefore we'll have to keep all the "mitigation measures" in place forever, right? Why wouldn't those be required? These people are playing games as they count the angels on the head of pin. What a joke. They are all ignorant and/or liars. Read it and weep.

Notice that they brilliantly come to the realization that the edicts of The Great Barrington Declaration are likely the long term solution. Duh! smh.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/03/health/covid-herd-immunity-vaccine.html

Reaching ‘Herd Immunity’ Is Unlikely in the U.S., Experts Now Believe

Widely circulating coronavirus variants and persistent hesitancy about vaccines will keep the goal out of reach. The virus is here to stay, but vaccinating the most vulnerable may be enough to restore normalcy.

so LtGov said we won't reach herd immunity because not enough people getting vaxd - aren't those that recovered from the Covid part of the herd?

No, they are not. The current research shows that those previously infected have approximately the same degree and longevity of immunity as those being "vaccinated". Why wouldn't those with "natural immunity" be considered part of the "herd"? Why are they required to take the drugs to be considered part of the "herd"? Is it a conspiracy if the collusion is true?

so LtGov said we won't reach herd immunity because not enough people getting vaxd - aren't those that recovered from the Covid part of the herd?

people around the country are finally figuring this out
and blaming it on "republicans"...

I wonder what correlates exist (I mean besides extremely high proportion of SAFETY CULT members, obviously) in the other 6 or 7 states that appear to join Hawaii as unanimous in every county as to willingness/desire to take the drugs? Hmmm? I'd like to see political party registration numbers for sure.