Not every strategy works.  But I can tell/bet you opening vaccines to children will 100% increase the current amount of vaccinated compared to not opening it up 

so will you admit that your prediction that increasing walkins would increase demand was wrong?

so will you admit that your prediction that increasing walkins would increase demand was wrong?

Someone is a genius.  Allow those who cannot get vaxxed, to be able to get vaxxed will cause an increase in the amount of people vaxxed.  Damn econ101 course was taken recently.

so will you admit that your prediction that increasing walkins would increase demand was wrong?

Yes. It was a good theory. Though it would be hard to prove that it didn't have an effect.  Perhaps the number would be far lower without it. 

maths are hard
how many days at 50k a day will it take to vaccinate your hypothetical amount of 12-15 yo?

Not sure on the current ability to mass vaccinate.  But anywhere from 1-15 days is reasonable.  Not 50k a day but total 50k.  So if you can vaccinate them all in one day you done,  if not 10 days of 5k works too.

Yes. It was a good theory. Though it would be hard to prove that it didn't have an effect.  Perhaps the number would be far lower without it.

lol, it must be so nice to live in your world
goalposts are moving yet again...

Not sure on the current ability to mass vaccinate.  But anywhere from 1-15 days is reasonable.  Not 50k a day but total 50k.  So if you can vaccinate them all in one day you done,  if not 10 days of 5k works too.

so now you are saying you compared the current 3k a day to 50k in 1-15 days?
way to change your answer when called out...

Not sure on the current ability to mass vaccinate.  But anywhere from 1-15 days is reasonable.  Not 50k a day but total 50k.  So if you can vaccinate them all in one day you done,  if not 10 days of 5k works too.

the current ability to mass vaccinate is well known
a few weeks ago, they were doing over 30k a day...

Yes. It was a good theory. Though it would be hard to prove that it didn't have an effect.  Perhaps the number would be far lower without it.

really, please show me where it says in theory that increasing supply automatically increases demand...

Dr. Zelenko comments on the Salk Institute study showing the that "vaccine" generated spike proteins can damage human cells, especially those of blood vessels. He briefly mentions "vaccine regret". He makes the profound point that you can't make a rational evidence-based logical risk/reward assessment unless you have sufficient data, which at the present time we don't... and that's why the "vaccines" aren't approved as "safe and effective".

https://www.oann.com/doctor-explains-vaccine-regret/

Back to work slackers.

BREAKING: In order to address workforce shortages throughout South Carolina, Governor Henry McMaster orders termination of state’s participation in all federal, pandemic-related unemployment benefit programs -

really, please show me where it says in theory that increasing supply automatically increases demand...

That "theory" doesn't apply to things that are FREE!

In economics, prices of limited products are "bid up" as those who are willing to pay more to get it rather than do without.

Once the supply increases beyond a certain level, prices fall -- buyers no longer have to choose between higher prices and going without. 

It's the LOWER PRICE that causes increased demand.  The increased supply is a factor that affects the price -- NOT DEMAND.

When something is free, price is not tied to supply.  Subsequently, supply has no effect on demand.

Someone needs to read a book or take a class on economics before spewing bullshit about an obviously made-up "good theory" that doesn't exist anywhere but in his mind.

Back to work slackers.

BREAKING: In order to address workforce shortages throughout South Carolina, Governor Henry McMaster orders termination of state’s participation in all federal, pandemic-related unemployment benefit programs -

Didn't they just want to pass death by firing squad too?

moderna mentions that a booster will be needed about 9-12 months later.  So would this be a life time thing?  Say it is and 5 years later, someone who wasn't vaxxed, wants to now get vaxxed.  Do they have to get the OG versions first and get pumped with 5 years of boosters in a few month time span?

Didn't they just want to pass death by firing squad too?

They DID pass execution by firing squad. They haven't been able to get any of the lethal injection drugs since 2013 because the woke manufacturers won't sell to the states using lethal injection. They have a backlog of death row inmates who have had all appeals denied. And, not surprisingly, they have all chosen (I can't believe they get to choose their method of execution!) lethal injection, knowing that no such possibility exists. The new legislation removes the death row inmates right to chose method, and gives it to the state. They have electric chair (which they have not used) and now firing squad. Is there an ethical problem with using those inmates in medical experiments? I mean, if they volunteer of course, and seeing as how they were all likely upstanding good citizens before some unfortunate circumstance caused them to rape and/or murder people, they'd be glad to volunteer. I can think of a couple of "vaccine" experiments...

moderna mentions that a booster will be needed about 9-12 months later.  So would this be a life time thing?  Say it is and 5 years later, someone who wasn't vaxxed, wants to now get vaxxed.  Do they have to get the OG versions first and get pumped with 5 years of boosters in a few month time span?

Big Pharma raking it in on the extended payment plan

They DID pass execution by firing squad. They haven't been able to get any of the lethal injection drugs since 2013 because the woke manufacturers won't sell to the states using lethal injection. They have a backlog of death row inmates who have had all appeals denied. And, not surprisingly, they have all chosen (I can't believe they get to choose their method of execution!) lethal injection, knowing that no such possibility exists. The new legislation removes the death row inmates right to chose method, and gives it to the state. They have electric chair (which they have not used) and now firing squad. Is there an ethical problem with using those inmates in medical experiments? I mean, if they volunteer of course, and seeing as how they were all likely upstanding good citizens before some unfortunate circumstance caused them to rape and/or murder people, they'd be glad to volunteer. I can think of a couple of "vaccine" experiments...

Ironically China is flooding our country with Fentanyl, we should start putting it to good use and sticking that in the execution IV, we seize so much of it,, it's basically free now.

really, please show me where it says in theory that increasing supply automatically increases demand...

Not supply, but access. I would sooner go to HPD to register with an appointment rather than walk in.  Simply because its easier.

moderna mentions that a booster will be needed about 9-12 months later.  So would this be a life time thing?  Say it is and 5 years later, someone who wasn't vaxxed, wants to now get vaxxed.  Do they have to get the OG versions first and get pumped with 5 years of boosters in a few month time span?

Or maybe its cause the virus mutates and not all vaccines last for life?

Back to work slackers.

BREAKING: In order to address workforce shortages throughout South Carolina, Governor Henry McMaster orders termination of state’s participation in all federal, pandemic-related unemployment benefit programs -

I doubt this is legal.