Acquitted, let the liberal screeching start.

The usual republicunts voted against him, of course.

As Sen. Tim Kane said, “I’m very worried about going through this trial and having the punch line at the end, being Trump acquitted again.”

As we predicted, the joke is the Democrats in Congress.  Can't have a punchline without a joke!

Obviously, Kane wasn't so worried that it stopped him from voting for the impeachment trial.

What's the saying?  When you try to assassinate the king, you better not miss!?

The Dems have nothing more to offer now.  Orange Man Bad is now irrelevant.

Of course, they aren't going to let a little thing like running the country stop them from going after him again and again! 

 

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1356659798121545729?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1356659798121545729%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.investmentwatchblog.com%2Fsen-tim-kaine-im-very-worried-about-going-through-this-trial-and-having-the-punch-line-at-the-end-being-trump-acquitted-again%2F

I predict (will the sun rise tomorrow?) that every single thing (policy, EO, mumbled pronouncement, etc.) that doesn't shine the bright light of truth, harmony, justice and equality (okay... "equity") for all in the China Bidet regime will be denounced as the fault of Trump. What else are they gonna do, take responsibility? 

That millennial pissant will be inconsolable, but no doubt full of excuses about why it does not matter.

Unfortunate.  But that's the justice system I'll accept the results.  Hope he doesn't run in 2024 else we will have another democrat for 4 more years. 

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Unfortunate.  But that's the justice system I'll accept the results.  Hope he doesn't run in 2024 else we will have another democrat for 4 more years.

This had NOTHING AT ALL to do with the justice system.

Just like the first impeachment trial, the HOUSE expected the SENATE to do their job -- calling witnesses, finding facts, and defining what the charges entailed.

Unlike the last impeachment, the HOUSE didn't even pretend to hold hearings.  They thought they could use Google and video footage as their evidence without an iota of proof of what they claimed the "evidence" meant.  No anonymous spies/whistleblowers of supposedly illegal comments on a publicly released phone call.

Did you miss the FACT that Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Roberts declined to even hear the case?  How does that reconcile with your understanding of the justice system?  Name another impeachment trial in which the Chief Justice recused himself from the trial.  That's an actual CHALLENGE for you.  See if you're up to finding actual facts about the trial rather than repeating the same wrong opinion.

Your continued attempts to breathe legitimacy into ANOTHER obviously illegitimate impeachment shows how far you've descended into the Libtard, MSM-driven, TDS-centric swamp.

You're beyond hope.

This had NOTHING AT ALL to do with the justice system.

Just like the first impeachment trial, the HOUSE expected the SENATE to do their job -- calling witnesses, finding facts, and defining what the charges entailed.

Unlike the last impeachment, the HOUSE didn't even pretend to hold hearings.  They thought they could use Google and video footage as their evidence without an iota of proof of what they claimed the "evidence" meant.  No anonymous spies/whistleblowers of supposedly illegal comments on a publicly released phone call.

Did you miss the FACT that Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Roberts declined to even hear the case?  How does that reconcile with your understanding of the justice system?  Name another impeachment trial in which the Chief Justice recused himself from the trial.  That's an actual CHALLENGE for you.  See if you're up to finding actual facts about the trial rather than repeating the same wrong opinion.

Your continued attempts to breathe legitimacy into ANOTHER obviously illegitimate impeachment shows how shallow you've descended into the Libtard, MSM-driven, TDS-centric swamp.

You're beyond hope.

Legitimacy is not the question at hand. They used the prescribed process.

This was ultimately a political question and it comes down to a subjective matter of opinion.

But you are correct, it has nothing to do with the justice system.

Legitimacy is not the question at hand. They used the proscribed process.

This was ultimately a political question and it comes down to a subjective matter of opinion.

But you are correct, it has nothing to do with the justice system.

The prescribed process is to at least have evidence a crime was committed.

Guess you missed that part of the process where EVERY OTHER HOUSE held hearings before deciding on the crimes to list in the Articles of Impeachment.

These clowns once again decided on the crime, then expected the Senate to discover the evidence from the mountain of crap the managers presented.

The impeachment was illegitimate on its face.  Fastest impeachment in US history, and it was another failure.  How many times before you see that the Dems are abusing their Constitutional powers for purely political theatrics and at the expense of the entire nation?  Neither trial had anything to do with an actual crime.  Hell, the first Articles didn't even bother to list a crime -- just "Abuse of power".  So ambiguous and broad, proving it was impossible.

Now they settled on "Incitement of Insurgency."  No witnesses to even bolster their claims that impeaching Trump out of office was even Constitutional.  A Senate vote where 47 disagreed it's legitimate at all is not an endorsement.  The legitimacy is still not settled, but the Dems managed to shove it through a vote.

Facts are not decided on by majority votes in the Senate.  Votes only tally the Yeas and Nays of a bunch of elected politicians who vote more down party lines than they do based on facts.

Illegitimate.  No question in my mind.  The rush to impeach, the lack of witnesses -- expert or fact witnesses -- and the Dems using fake news as sources for "evidence" tells me this was a railroad job.  The witch hunt to "get Trump" continues.

Correct, this was an unconstitutional last gasp effort at damaging the insanely hated Trump.

Now the liberals have to look forward to us conservatives rubbing their faces in it, while Trump lives in their heads 24/7.

Correct, this was an unconstitutional last gasp effort at damaging the insanely hated Trump.

Now the liberals have to look forward to us conservatives rubbing their faces in it, while Trump lives in their heads 24/7.

Ever see the original Lion King cartoon? Replace "Mufasa!" with "Trump!"   

Following

Legitimacy is not the question at hand. They used the proscribed process.

This was ultimately a political question and it comes down to a subjective matter of opinion.

But you are correct, it has nothing to do with the justice system.

Proscribe: -verb-
1: to publish the name of as condemned to death with the property of the condemned forfeited to the state
2: to condemn or forbid as harmful or unlawful : PROHIBIT

Somehow, when you make this kind of error, it's difficult to trust anything else you post as factual.

Never lose sight of the fact that this woman is 3rd in line for the White House. 

We're just one accident that takes out Biden and Harris from a Pelosi Presidency.

Somehow, when you make this kind of error, it's difficult to trust anything else you post as factual.

Hence putting the HPD troll on ignore, no point in reading anything.

I wish you guys would stop quoting these liberal trolls so I do not have to get a glance of just why they are ignored.

Ever see the original Lion King cartoon? Replace "Mufasa!" with "Trump!"   

Never saw that, but something similar:

2-0 DNC troll master level 9999.


And crazy maize post how the GOP ignores "facts". Either shes retarted or intentionally trying to sabotage.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Oh boy that was an epic spanking. I'll bet that chicks ass is still red.