So “evidence” is enough for you in that case?

:facepalm:

You really don’t get it…

There has been a whole "justice system"  process.  Its not just evidence.  It has been proven.  That's the key difference.   Evidence alone without a process to validate is not enough.  Sorry for not elaborating on that and causing your confusion.  Edited original post.

So “evidence” is enough for you in that case?

:facepalm:

You really don’t get it…

No, he does! His mind is made up already. No matter what you post or say it ain't going to change his view. Normally, it takes a life changing event to change made up minds. Continue...

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

I thought it was pretty hilarious when Joe quoted Chairman Mao, its not that funny now that he is quoting Joseph Stalin. This is worse than when Hillary Clinton said Big Brother was the hero in Orwell's 1984.


https://twitter.com/scuba2024/status/1415024546269257737


These people are stupid and evil.

 

I thought it was pretty hilarious when Joe quoted Chairman Mao, its not that funny now that he is quoting Joseph Stalin. This is worse than when Hillary Clinton said Big Brother was the hero in Orwell's 1984.


https://twitter.com/scuba2024/status/1415024546269257737


These people are stupid and evil.

 

I'd go with evil!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

no reasonable people could have voted for old Joe...well 2020 was the year of unreasonable

fresh memes right out of the oven...

There's no evidence that they altered votes but there is proven evidence they tried to sway public opinion by "campaigning". They posted fake political news and tried to alter public opinion.

Please look up "attempted" and then explain how what you said ("tried") is any different than "attempted interference".

Even when you agree, you have to try to argue.

There was no interference.  There was an attempt to interfere.  How much more simply can I say it for you?  You already get it, but you can't let anyone else be right.

It's a tough road to hoe working for the Bidens. A lot of sleepless nights when you are surrounded by enemies. You aren't even safe in your own bed.

Please look up "attempted" and then explain how what you said ("tried") is any different than "attempted interference".

Even when you agree, you have to try to argue.

There was no interference.  There was an attempt to interfere.  How much more simply can I say it for you?  You already get it, but you can't let anyone else be right.

They did not change votes via the ballot.  But interfered in our election via fakenews.  Which swayed public opinion.   Its much harder to prove to the exact extent, but its not zero.  Hence not an attempt. 

They did not change votes via the ballot.  But interfered in our election via fakenews.  Which swayed public opinion.   Its much harder to prove to the exact extent, but its not zero.  Hence not an attempt.

Once again, you have to argue.

You already said they TRIED to interfere.  Now you are back to "interfered"  You think they "swayed public opinion."  THERE IS NO EVIDENCE ANYONE WAS SWAYED.

If that's false, then show EVIDENCE that ANYONE had their opinions "swayed."

Every poll and study I've seen, including the multi-million dollar Mueller hoax report, stated they found no evidence that the ATTEMPTS to interfere had any effect at all.

Prove me wrong, or stop arguing.

The only way the Russia-Collusion hoax had any chance of being investigated is if the Russians actually interfered in the election.

The Mueller report went to great lengths to show that Russian-tied hackers attempted to influence voters by mostly buying ads on Facebook and Twitter.  After years of investigating, not a single verified instance of actual success was found.  Nobody changed their opinions of the candidates based on anything the Russians posted.

The Trump haters NEED to keep the "election  interference" conspiracy theory alive.  If they admit it was a failed attempt, then the Russia-Trump hoax has no basis.  How can their be collusion if there was no actual interference that impacted the election? 

In their minds, Trump stole the election with Russia's help.  The fact that Russia's efforts were of no help at all never enters the equation.

Maybe they will burn all the heretics on a pyre.

Biden Admin. Invites U.N. Racism Investigators To Visit U.S.



Somewhere Alex Jones is saying I told ya so.




https://breaking911.com/breaking-biden-admin-invites-u-n-racism-investigators-to-visit-u-s/

Once again, you have to argue.

You already said they TRIED to interfere.  Now you are back to "interfered"  You think they "swayed public opinion."  THERE IS NO EVIDENCE ANYONE WAS SWAYED.

If that's false, then show EVIDENCE that ANYONE had their opinions "swayed."

Every poll and study I've seen, including the multi-million dollar Mueller hoax report, stated they found no evidence that the ATTEMPTS to interfere had any effect at all.

Prove me wrong, or stop arguing.

Neither can prove either side wrong or right.  With todays knowledge.  I am sure someone could make a poll or search into one voter who saw the fakenews and voted a certain way.  The goal of the Russians was the interfere, they did fakenews to try and interfere.  Did they succeed?  Maybe.  I'll just stop arguing on you with this subject.  Same s%$^ as arguing about religion. 

Though I do agree with the republicans that there is no evidence of direct tampering.  Much like the 2020 election.

Neither can prove either side wrong or right.  With todays knowledge.  I am sure someone could make a poll or search into one voter who saw the fakenews and voted a certain way.  The goal of the Russians was the interfere, they did fakenews to try and interfere.  Did they succeed?  Maybe.  I'll just stop arguing on you with this subject.  Same s%$^ as arguing about religion. 

Though I do agree with the republicans that there is no evidence of direct tampering.  Much like the 2020 election.

If you can't prove you're right, then why do you keep arguing it's right?

 

it's not the same as religion.  If the STUDIES and POLLS already conducted concluded there are NO KNOWN INSTANCES that the attempts actually interfered in the election, then to continue arguing that the Russians interfered is dishonest and unsupported.

Like I said several posts ago, start saying "attempted interference," unless there is evidence they interfered.  The continued use of "interfered" implied they did actually have an effect.  You already admitted they TRIED.  You have no evidence they had any impact. 

Just admit I was right and stop arguing.

Neither can prove either side wrong or right.  With todays knowledge.  I am sure someone could make a poll or search into one voter who saw the fakenews and voted a certain way.  The goal of the Russians was the interfere, they did fakenews to try and interfere.  Did they succeed?  Maybe.  I'll just stop arguing on you with this subject.  Same s%$^ as arguing about religion. 

Though I do agree with the republicans that there is no evidence of direct tampering.  Much like the 2020 election.

losing, so tries to say he will stop arguing, and then tries to slip in a cheap shot at the end
stay classy...

If you can't prove you're right, then why do you keep arguing it's right?

 

it's not the same as religion.  If the STUDIES and POLLS already conducted concluded there are NO KNOWN INSTANCES that the attempts actually interfered in the election, then to continue arguing that the Russians interfered is dishonest and unsupported.

Like I said several posts ago, start saying "attempted interference," unless there is evidence they interfered.  The continued use of "interfered" implied they did actually have an effect.  You already admitted they TRIED.  You have no evidence they had any impact. 

Just admit I was right and stop arguing.

Please show me these studies and polls showing 0 interference.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-evidence-shows-how-russias-election-interference-has-gotten-more

losing, so tries to say he will stop arguing, and then tries to slip in a cheap shot at the end
stay classy...

I can keep going on but then flapp will scream offtopic. 

I can keep going on but then flapp will scream offtopic.

Waiting on covid death rate to be posted.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

I can keep going on but then flapp will scream offtopic.

Living in your head.

That's exactly what I was striving for.  If you can recognize when you are off topic, that's half the battle!

You get a gold star for the day!   

people who can read and know what words mean are aware there is already an an election thread and a news / media thread, learn to poop in the correct toilet.