A friend who lives in CA was just complaining about not having the “cool” rifles he wants to have... he may have a better chance of getting these rifles now.


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/06/04/judge-rules-californias-assault-weapons-ban-unconstitutional/

One step farther to taking the commie out of commiefornia

The ruling is 94 pages:

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/5381/attachments/original/1622850515/Miller_v_Bonta_Opinion.pdf?1622850515

The first line of the decision reads:

Like the Swiss Army Knife, the popular AR-15 rifle is a perfect combination of
home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment. Good for both home and battle,
the AR-15 is the kind of versatile gun that lies at the intersection of the kinds of firearms
protected under District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v
Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). Yet, the State of California makes it a crime to have an AR15
type rifle. Therefore, this Court declares the California statutes to be unconstitutional

So, out of 94 pages, what is the main thing the press, anti-gun zealots, the CA governor, and all the other 2A haters get bent out of shape over?

"Swiss Army Knife!"   

The judge used the comparison to show how VERSATILE the AR-15 is, just like a Swiss Army Knife is able to perform so many tasks and functions, 

But, of course, the idiots are trying to say the judge stated the AR-15 is like a Swiss Army Knife -- as if both tools' functions are the same.

If that's all they have out of such a lengthy decision, then I think they are grasping at straws -- as usual.