shocking, dangerous
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-capitol-police-arrest-representative-beatty-during-protest-in-hart-senate-office-building

Was she legally allowed to be there?  Seems like simple trespassing. 

Was she legally allowed to be there?  Seems like simple trespassing.

READ THE ARTICLE.

We can explain it to you, but we can't understand it for you.

"This afternoon, nine people were arrested for demonstrating in a prohibited area on Capitol Grounds,"
the Capitol Police said in a statement to Fox News.

Was she legally allowed to be there?  Seems like simple trespassing.

Try using Google for something other than a source to confirm your personal biases.

https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/press-releases/illegal-demonstration-capitol-grounds

https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/sections/22-1307.html

READ THE ARTICLE.

We can explain it to you, but we can't understand it for you.

If it's not in the title, it doesn't count. Omnireading101

READ THE ARTICLE.

We can explain it to you, but we can't understand it for you.

Sarcasm is hard

Sarcasm is hard

is she a terrorist?

Sarcasm is hard

ALL of your comments read as sarcasm, since nobody should be that stupid.

Hard to pick out which you meant as sarcasm, and which were just ridiculous.

There's nothing sarcastic about your post.  You're using that term to shield yourself from being called out for not reading the article before commenting.

You're lucky your nose wasn't carved by Geppetto.

is she a terrorist?

Nope more like a criminal.  Doesn't reach the terrorist definition.

ALL of your comments read as sarcasm, since nobody should be that stupid.

Hard to pick out which you meant as sarcasm, and which were just ridiculous.

There's nothing sarcastic about your post.  You're using that term to shield yourself from being called out for not reading the article before commenting.

You're lucky your nose wasn't carved by Geppetto.

Sarcasm requires intelligence.  This whole thread was satire from the first post.  Obviously its not an insurrection if she was breaking a trespassing law....

Sarcasm requires intelligence.  This whole thread was satire from the first post.  Obviously its not an insurrection if she was breaking the law....

Then you should avoid attempting sarcasm like the plague!

Wait!  Is it your understanding that anyone breaking the law is not involved in an insurrection?

You should let the DOJ know to stop investigating the "insurrection" on Jan 6th, since all they did was trespass and break a few doors and windows.  Minor crimes only -- no insurrection.

Then you should avoid attempting sarcasm like the plague!

Wait!  Is it your understanding that anyone breaking the law is not involved in an insurrection?

You should let the DOJ know to stop investigating the "insurrection" on Jan 6th, since all they did was trespass and break a few doors and windows.  Minor crimes only -- no insurrection.

I guess I should have worded that differently.  Obviously insurrection is different than regular breaking the law.  Just like breaking the law is different than terrorism.  Sorry about that.

The satire here is comparing what she did with insurrection isn't even close.

'Sarcasm requires intelligence'


Nobody kicks OG in the nuts harder than he does to himself.

I guess I should have worded that differently.  Obviously insurrection is different than regular breaking the law.  Just like breaking the law is different than terrorism.  Sorry about that.

The satire here is comparing what she did with insurrection isn't even close.

goalposts----->all over the place

I guess I should have worded that differently.  Obviously insurrection is different than regular breaking the law.  Just like breaking the law is different than terrorism.  Sorry about that.

The satire here is comparing what she did with insurrection isn't even close.

Hard to make a point when you don't understand the words you use.

I'm glad you understand that sarcasm requires intelligence.  Maybe you will figure out why you keep failing at it.

ALL of your comments read as sarcasm, since nobody should be that stupid.

Hard to pick out which you meant as sarcasm, and which were just ridiculous.

There's nothing sarcastic about your post.  You're using that term to shield yourself from being called out for not reading the article before commenting.

You're lucky your nose wasn't carved by Geppetto.

This sums it up. New tactic of using sarcasm as excuse for being wrong.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

goalposts----->all over the place

English is hard.   Only so much swiping on a phone can do.  Mistakes happen.

English is hard.   Only so much swiping on a phone can do.  Mistakes happen.

Sarcasm?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

English is hard.   Only so much swiping on a phone can do.  Mistakes happen.

but you still not wrong...

Sarcasm?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Nope.  I genuinely am not the greatest at English.   I do type on a phone and don't always reread my posts. Mistakes do happen.