Just keep trying to shut down my opinion. You don’t want to discuss this, you just want to try and belittle my opinion. Way to go trying to open people’s minds and have a real discussion.

That’s the overall strategy of media censorship these days

Meanwhile they are quietly building the camps

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/australia-building-quarantine-camps-ongoing-operations

Someone might say that what’s happening in the hospitals are just conspiracies and are not reality.


STEW PETERS SHOW
Nurse Whistleblower Breaks Down, Cries in LIVE Tell-All Interview

 https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/09/nurse-whistleblower-breaks-down-cries-in-live-tell-all-interview/

That’s the overall strategy of media censorship these days

Meanwhile they are quietly building the camps

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/australia-building-quarantine-camps-ongoing-operations

I believe I heard they were building the camps several months ago. This just verifies that it is ongoing.

Lol @ all the full blown conspiracies when I was gone.   No hard evidence.  Comparing covid to the holocaust is foolish and insulting to people who actually experienced the holocaust.

👏 👏 👏

While you were gone you missed the following:

1) Threads went on for pages because Omni doesn't understand things and refuses to admit he is wrong
2) Then after many pages, if he does admit he was wrong, it's a half baked admission. Like "I was wrong, but.." or "maybe you're right". Uses deflection a lot.
3) He also moved goal post when proven wrong, refer to #1 also about needlessly long post. And why he brings up the same faulty arguments because it's hard to remember lies.
4) I broke it down to him in 3 post that he is the problem.  I was very direct and not beating around the bush
5) Since then, I have stopped replying to him. But he still feels the need to reply to me, even after I told him he won't get a reply. Then he sites freedom hoping to get a reply.  Slow learner I guess.
6) He has been banned twice already, and still thinks it's not his fault. Refer to #2 above
7)  He has been back only 1 day and already his post are contradicting himself and doesn't understand concepts still (SWOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSHHHHHHH)
EEF's arguments are better than his, so that's why I respond to EEF on occasion
9) He's been puffing his chest more prior to being banned. Guess faulty arguments run out after so many weeks, so need to make self feel like the big man on campus is needed.  But we all see thru it.
10) Like's to assume things until someone post "please show me where...".  Then after making the wrong assumption, refer to #1 and #2 again.
11) He post links to back up his arguments, but doesn't actually read past the title or 1st paragraph because said link prove he is wrong still.  Then refer back to #2 again and #1


Im sure there is more, but this is just what comes off the top of my head right now.  So I chose not to reply. Others do, but that's their choice. Only reason why I haven't blocked him is because me and others get a laugh at his expense when ever he post something.  And these are hardcore DNC friends who also are laughing.  It's like talking to an anti gunner who wants to ban "assault rifles". They are proven their logic based on feelings is wrong, and no amount of evidence you provide will change that feeling.

While you were gone you missed the following:

1) Threads went on for pages because Omni doesn't understand things and refuses to admit he is wrong
2) Then after many pages, if he does admit he was wrong, it's a half baked admission. Like "I was wrong, but.." or "maybe you're right". Uses deflection a lot.
3) He also moved goal post when proven wrong, refer to #1 also about needlessly long post. And why he brings up the same faulty arguments because it's hard to remember lies.
4) I broke it down to him in 3 post that he is the problem.  I was very direct and not beating around the bush
5) Since then, I have stopped replying to him. But he still feels the need to reply to me, even after I told him he won't get a reply. Then he sites freedom hoping to get a reply.  Slow learner I guess.
6) He has been banned twice already, and still thinks it's not his fault. Refer to #2 above
7)  He has been back only 1 day and already his post are contradicting himself and doesn't understand concepts still (SWOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSHHHHHHH)
EEF's arguments are better than his, so that's why I respond to EEF on occasion
9) He's been puffing his chest more prior to being banned. Guess faulty arguments run out after so many weeks, so need to make self feel like the big man on campus is needed.  But we all see thru it.
10) Like's to assume things until someone post "please show me where...".  Then after making the wrong assumption, refer to #1 and #2 again.
11) He post links to back up his arguments, but doesn't actually read past the title or 1st paragraph because said link prove he is wrong still.  Then refer back to #2 again and #1


Im sure there is more, but this is just what comes off the top of my head right now.  So I chose not to reply. Others do, but that's their choice. Only reason why I haven't blocked him is because me and others get a laugh at his expense when ever he post something.  And these are hardcore DNC friends who also are laughing.  It's like talking to an anti gunner who wants to ban "assault rifles". They are proven their logic based on feelings is wrong, and no amount of evidence you provide will change that feeling.

Hey, don't scare him away, he just got back! I know its Halloween but slow you ride, pump your brakes.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Hey, don't scare him away, he just got back! I know its Halloween but slow you ride, pump your brakes.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

He won't be scared away.  You need to understand what is being said first. Which he won't get anyways.

While you were gone you missed the following:

1) Threads went on for pages because Omni doesn't understand things and refuses to admit he is wrong
2) Then after many pages, if he does admit he was wrong, it's a half baked admission. Like "I was wrong, but.." or "maybe you're right". Uses deflection a lot.
3) He also moved goal post when proven wrong, refer to #1 also about needlessly long post. And why he brings up the same faulty arguments because it's hard to remember lies.
4) I broke it down to him in 3 post that he is the problem.  I was very direct and not beating around the bush
5) Since then, I have stopped replying to him. But he still feels the need to reply to me, even after I told him he won't get a reply. Then he sites freedom hoping to get a reply.  Slow learner I guess.
6) He has been banned twice already, and still thinks it's not his fault. Refer to #2 above
7)  He has been back only 1 day and already his post are contradicting himself and doesn't understand concepts still (SWOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSHHHHHHH)
EEF's arguments are better than his, so that's why I respond to EEF on occasion
9) He's been puffing his chest more prior to being banned. Guess faulty arguments run out after so many weeks, so need to make self feel like the big man on campus is needed.  But we all see thru it.
10) Like's to assume things until someone post "please show me where...".  Then after making the wrong assumption, refer to #1 and #2 again.
11) He post links to back up his arguments, but doesn't actually read past the title or 1st paragraph because said link prove he is wrong still.  Then refer back to #2 again and #1


Im sure there is more, but this is just what comes off the top of my head right now.  So I chose not to reply. Others do, but that's their choice. Only reason why I haven't blocked him is because me and others get a laugh at his expense when ever he post something.  And these are hardcore DNC friends who also are laughing.  It's like talking to an anti gunner who wants to ban "assault rifles". They are proven their logic based on feelings is wrong, and no amount of evidence you provide will change that feeling.

To us, that's a list of problems he needs to work on.

For a troll, that's his resume!   

To us, that's a list of problems he needs to work on.

For a troll, that's his resume!   

And by his comeback from his time gone, he hasn't.

And by his comeback from his time gone, he hasn't.

So, let's not allow him to make this thread about him again.

Moving on .....

 

CNN Attempts Damage Control After Being Humiliated by Joe Rogan

https://bongino.com/cnn-attempts-damage-control-after-being-humiliated-by-joe-rogan/

CNN attempted damage control after numerous clips of Joe Rogan humiliating his recent podcast guest, chief CNN medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta, went viral on social media.
During one exchange where Joe Rogan blasted CNN for lying about his use of ivermectin, Gupta had no choice but to agree that the network misrepresented him.

However someone at CNN apparently decided that could not stand, and when Gupta appeared on Don Lemon’s show last night Lemon doubled down on the network’s sensationalized reporting while Gupta nodded in agreement.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

SHOCK VIDEO: Pfizer Scientist admits Pfizer Covid vaccine "just doesn't work" in some people"

https://youtube.com/shorts/nFqhPX78K20?feature=share

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Just keep trying to shut down my opinion. You don’t want to discuss this, you just want to try and belittle my opinion. Way to go trying to open people’s minds and have a real discussion. Put downs again are not a good way to attempt a discussion. I did not do that to you. Why would you do that to me? Don’t answer that. I already know.

Your tactics are cancel culture BS. Go find someone else to try and use your tactics on. Lying about wanting real discussion and then trying to use cancel culture tactics to try and shut me up is not being intellectually honest. Just stop.

I didn't try to shut down your opinion, I just disagreed with you. I am perfectly happy to discuss it and support my stance but your reply was basically an insult to my intelligence by saying that the point escapes me. If you don't want a sarcastic response then don't go accusing me not being able to understand something just because I disagree with your conclusion.

You are not getting cancelled because I said your statement was a hyperbole. I didn't report you to the moderators or anything, how am I trying to cancel you?

You want to discuss this then lets discuss this. How is an "i'm vaccinated" sticker similar to star of david patches that jews had to wear during WW2? beyond them being signs that people wear? Are vaccination stickers a way to identify a group of people so they can be identified so they can be segregated just for who they are and ultimately murdered? Not at all. Germans were trying to get rid of Jews, the government now isn't trying to kill the vaccine hesitant, they are trying to keep them safe. If they wanted to kill the vaccine hesitant then they would deny us vaccines not try to get us to eat them.

I didn't try to shut down your opinion,

That is a lie. Reread your response with all your petty comments and put downs. Continue to reread it. And if you still can’t see it then, SWOOOOOOOSH!!!!

I just disagreed with you.

That is also a lie. See my comments above.

I am perfectly happy to discuss it and support my stance but your reply was basically an insult to my intelligence by saying that the point escapes me.

I am sorry if I hurt your feelings. But you shouldn’t belittle someone and insult someone just because you still don’t get what I said. It is because of this sort of discussion in the past that I decided not to try and explain it to you. Your past actions proceed you.

If you don't want a sarcastic response then don't go accusing me not being able to understand something just because I disagree with your conclusion.

Wait, so now you are admitting you insulted and belittled me? Right after you said you didn’t? Which is it? Either you did it or you didn’t. Caught you in another lie.

You are not getting cancelled because I said your statement was a hyperbole. I didn't report you to the moderators or anything, how am I trying to cancel you?

You want to discuss this then lets discuss this. How is an "i'm vaccinated" sticker similar to star of david patches that jews had to wear during WW2? beyond them being signs that people wear? Are vaccination stickers a way to identify a group of people so they can be identified so they can be segregated just for who they are and ultimately murdered? Not at all. Germans were trying to get rid of Jews, the government now isn't trying to kill the vaccine hesitant, they are trying to keep them safe. If they wanted to kill the vaccine hesitant then they would deny us vaccines not try to get us to eat them.

It’s too late. I won’t discuss anything with you any more. EVER. Let’s be frank here. You started this. You engaged me with comments that showed you didn’t understand what I said. I responded by stating you didn’t understand it. You incorrectly assumed that I was doing this because you have a different opinion. I did it because you don’t get it. Then you post a response that is “Sarcastic” and belittles and puts down my opinion. Then in this response you plainly stated you didn’t do any of that and then came back and admitted your response was “Sarcastic” all in the same post. If that isn’t a typical definition of not telling the truth, I don’t know what is. I was going to ignore you originally. But I told you it went over your head for a reason. That reason was either so you could ask what it is that you didn’t get, or so you could have time to figure it out. Why? I did it as a courtesy so we might have a discussion. But after what you did, I see you have not changed after I was away for 6+ months. I guess I thought wrong.

I am not sure why you don’t believe what I say here. But realize this. I WILL NOT HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH YOU EVER AGAIN. By trying to engage with me again, I will know that you still don’t listen to nor believe things that I post. You have not changed. It’s a shame because you are a smart person. This is my last post to you.

"highly effective"

When are we going to admit the colossal stupidity of mass vaccinations with untested drugs and hold the liars accountable?

That is a lie. Reread your response with all your petty comments and put downs. Continue to reread it. And if you still can’t see it then, SWOOOOOOOSH!!!! That is also a lie. See my comments above.

I don't lie. How would I even shut you down? I am not a moderator, I have no ability to edit or delete anything you say. Thats just a spurious claim.

I am sorry if I hurt your feelings. But you shouldn’t belittle someone and insult someone just because you still don’t get what I said. It is because of this sort of discussion in the past that I decided not to try and explain it to you. Your past actions proceed you.

How did I belittle you? Edit: I see that you are not going to reply so I will not expect an answer.

Wait, so now you are admitting you insulted and belittled me? Right after you said you didn’t? Which is it? Either you did it or you didn’t. Caught you in another lie.

Tit for tat. I fight clean until the point the other side starts fighting dirty.

It’s too late. I won’t discuss anything with you any more. EVER. Let’s be frank here. You started this. You engaged me with comments that showed you didn’t understand what I said. I responded by stating you didn’t understand it. You incorrectly assumed that I was doing this because you have a different opinion. I did it because you don’t get it. Then you post a response that is “Sarcastic” and belittles and puts down my opinion. Then in this response you plainly stated you didn’t do any of that and then came back and admitted your response was “Sarcastic” all in the same post. If that isn’t a typical definition of not telling the truth, I don’t know what is. I was going to ignore you originally. But I told you it went over your head for a reason. That reason was either so you could ask what it is that you didn’t get, or so you could have time to figure it out. Why? I did it as a courtesy so we might have a discussion. But after what you did, I see you have not changed after I was away for 6+ months. I guess I thought wrong.

I understood your point, I just disagreed with it.

I am not sure why you don’t believe what I say here. But realize this. I WILL NOT HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH YOU EVER AGAIN. By trying to engage with me again, I will know that you still don’t listen to nor believe things that I post. You have not changed. It’s a shame because you are a smart person. This is my last post to you.

Fine by me, I cannot and do not force anyone to discuss something.

If someone offered you 9 million dollars to get the vaccine, would you do it ?
Not hypothetical. Nick Rolovich said no.
Edit:
He wouldn’t get the jab for 9 million buckas and probably a lot more and a prominent, was planned to be long term according to the school, coaching gig.
Plus gave up his company car and country club membership….

Moved from another thread as probably more appropriate here.

Moved from another thread as probably more appropriate here.

Im sure a better school with higher pay will pick him up. Head coaches shuffle a lot.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk