Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable? (Read 17060 times)

omnigun

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #40 on: August 11, 2021, 01:13:47 PM »
Yes, they have their version of communism that incorporates selective aspects of capitalism, which obviously works for them.

That, by-the-way, is what the ultrawealthy despises most about China.  China is led by a sole political party and not by its super-rich.  Moreover, this is a model that the leaders of the US empire does not want spreading to its territory or the minds of its subject-citizens.

Obviously working = dictator in charge.  No freedoms,  can't say or do anything.  The imprisonment of groups of people for nothing other than their "race" or religion.   Sweatshops and slavery.  Starvation.  Corruption.  Sure sounds like an utopia...

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #41 on: August 11, 2021, 01:25:15 PM »
You do know china is communist right?

You do know facts don't change because of your ignorance of them, right?

Quote
The economy of the People's Republic of China is a developing market-oriented economy
that incorporates economic planning through industrial policies and strategic five-year plans.
Dominated by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and mixed-ownership enterprises, the
economy also consists of a large domestic private sector and openness to foreign businesses
in a system described as a socialist market economy.[26][27][28]

State-owned enterprises accounted for over 60% of China's market capitalization in 2019[29]
and generated 40% of China's GDP of US$15.66 trillion in 2020,

with domestic and foreign private businesses and investment accounting for the remaining 60%.

Since you can't read English, here's the "China for Dummies" summary.

Although 60% of China's economy operates as a Communist-run system, that part only generates 40% of the country's revenue (GDP, or Gross Domestic Product).

In contrast, the remaining 40% of China's economic system involves domestic and foreign private businesses and investment (i.e. Capitalism), which generates 60% of the country's GDP.

It could be said that capitalism seems to be working better for China than "Communism."

This doesn't include Taiwan, which is more capitalistic than the US -- and is an extremely wealthy nation.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_China
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

omnigun

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #42 on: August 11, 2021, 01:40:50 PM »
You do know facts don't change because of your ignorance of them, right?

Since you can't read English, here's the "China for Dummies" summary.

Although 60% of China's economy operates as a Communist-run system, that part only generates 40% of the country's revenue (GDP, or Gross Domestic Product).

In contrast, the remaining 40% of China's economic system involves domestic and foreign private businesses and investment (i.e. Capitalism), which generates 60% of the country's GDP.

It could be said that capitalism seems to be working better for China than "Communism."

This doesn't include Taiwan, which is more capitalistic than the US -- and is an extremely wealthy nation.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_China

And china can at any time "takeover" the business.  Sure sounds capitalist.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #43 on: August 11, 2021, 01:52:35 PM »
And china can at any time "takeover" the business.  Sure sounds capitalist.

What "is" and what "could happen" are not synonyms.

#NeverWrong
#AlternateReality
#NotSarcasm
#TooStupidToDealWith
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

omnigun

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #44 on: August 11, 2021, 01:54:55 PM »
What "is" and what "could happen" are not synonyms.

#NeverWrong
#AlternateReality
#NotSarcasm
#TooStupidToDealWith

It has happened many times in the past....

changemyoil66

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #45 on: August 11, 2021, 01:57:02 PM »
It has happened many times in the past....

It also didn't happen many times in the past. So what's your point?  Besides to argue. Goal post about to be moved. BRB 6th F-15 on order. They cannot keep up with the demand.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #46 on: August 11, 2021, 02:00:12 PM »
It has happened many times in the past....

The US allowed the owning of slaves in the past.

Must mean it will happen again...
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Glasser

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #47 on: August 11, 2021, 02:05:53 PM »
Dummy is wrong as usual, in CCP China you NEVER own controlling interest in any of these commercial ventures to BEGIN with. They don't take it from you, they just fire you from the company you built.

drck1000

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #48 on: August 11, 2021, 02:11:59 PM »
Dummy is wrong as usual, in CCP China you NEVER own controlling interest in any of these commercial ventures to BEGIN with. They don't take it from you, they just fire you from the company you built.
But they feelz like they have ownership.  For the State. . .

drck1000

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #49 on: August 11, 2021, 02:12:30 PM »
The US allowed the owning of slaves in the past.

Must mean it will happen again...
History pulled down the GPA. 

omnigun

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #50 on: August 11, 2021, 02:16:59 PM »
The US allowed the owning of slaves in the past.

Must mean it will happen again...

Do we currently have slaves?  China has some.   China has taken over many companies in the past few years.  This isn't some long term past. 

I give up no need to reply to this post,  this argument has gone too long.  You can defend China all you want and communism.  As previously proved you do really like welfare. 

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #51 on: August 11, 2021, 04:01:38 PM »
Do we currently have slaves?  China has some.   China has taken over many companies in the past few years.  This isn't some long term past. 

I give up no need to reply to this post,  this argument has gone too long.  You can defend China all you want and communism.  As previously proved you do really like welfare.

Nothing wrong with welfare as long as the people who really need it get if for the length of time they need to get back on their on feet again.

Welfare is a safety net, not a hammock.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Glasser

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #52 on: August 13, 2021, 08:02:07 AM »
Biden is now saying they are 'Looking into restricting interstate travel for unvaccinated people', that is BLATANTLY unconstitutional and will cause a 'National Divorce'.

changemyoil66

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #53 on: August 13, 2021, 08:26:41 AM »
Biden is now saying they are 'Looking into restricting interstate travel for unvaccinated people', that is BLATANTLY unconstitutional and will cause a 'National Divorce'.
Many cant see 2 steps ahead. How did the germans go along with what was being done to the jews. Well, it didnt happen overnight.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Kuleana

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #54 on: August 13, 2021, 09:39:26 AM »
Biden is now saying they are 'Looking into restricting interstate travel for unvaccinated people', that is BLATANTLY unconstitutional and will cause a 'National Divorce'.
When was the last time, the US imperial government did anything that did not push the boundaries or outright violated the US Constitution?

America is and has been an empire for quite some time and on course for collapse and/or Balkanization.  The fact the current disagreements surrounding Covid-19, between the people and within the imperial government itself, is indicative of those fracture points that will serve as one the many domestic crises leading to the final dissolution, of the US empire.

groveler

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #55 on: August 13, 2021, 09:59:13 AM »
When was the last time, the US imperial government did anything that did not push the boundaries or outright violated the US Constitution?

America is and has been an empire for quite some time and on course for collapse and/or Balkanization.  The fact the current disagreements surrounding Covid-19, between the people and within the imperial government itself, is indicative of those fracture points that will serve as one the many domestic crises leading to the final dissolution, of the US empire.
Give me a good reason to substitute a Democrat Party government for
a racist Hawaiian monarchy?
I repudiate both, but you are very lucid sometimes.
Convince me.

changemyoil66

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #56 on: August 13, 2021, 10:21:18 AM »
Give me a good reason to substitute a Democrat Party government for
a racist Hawaiian monarchy?
I repudiate both, but you are very lucid sometimes.
Convince me.

If they were to take over and allow CCW, I may have to show support.

Kuleana

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #57 on: August 13, 2021, 10:27:46 AM »
Give me a good reason to substitute a Democrat Party government for
a racist Hawaiian monarchy?
I repudiate both, but you are very lucid sometimes.
Convince me.
I really don't understand how do you come to the conclusion that the Hawaiian Kingdom was a racist monarchy.

All historical evidence showed the Hawaiian Kingdom being an incredibly open ethnic and inclusive society.  Any types of racism you speak of, during the Kingdom era, were from the American descended Hawaiian nationals, who purposely worked to create laws that only benefited Caucasian people and set the stage for the illegal overthrow, with the aid, of the US empire.  Once more, those same traitors and insurgents, became REPUBLICANS, during the Territorial era, and furthered their racist political and economic control of Hawaii, until they were replaced, by the other political cheek, of the same buttock, the Democrats that you rightfully despise, in the so-called statehood era beginning in 1959.

omnigun

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #58 on: August 13, 2021, 10:39:17 AM »
If they were to take over and allow CCW, I may have to show support.

Potential Traitor.  I may see you and kuleana on the battlefield. I will always side with the United States of America.

Kuleana

Re: Is a 'National Divorce' Inevitable?
« Reply #59 on: August 13, 2021, 11:06:45 AM »
Potential Traitor.  I may see you and kuleana on the battlefield. I will always side with the United States of America.
So, what do we have here...

An "Imperial Army of One"?

In your surplus multicam fatigues you bought online and armed with your tacticool laptop, with its multi-purpose mouse, as your primary and secondary weapons; how can you loose?