Got a March 10-60x56 HM scope with FT reticle.
Simple reticle with a few hash marks. No need for a cluttered reticle (e.g. Horus) to shoot 1000 yards - only 50-100 yards at Kokohead, but hash marks are handy.
Compared it to my NF 15-55x52 with FCR-1 reticle.
Last Sunday, took both scopes to Kokohead and consecutively mounted them on the same rifle, under same conditions.
Through my eyes, the March is brighter, probably by virtue of a 34mm barrel vs. NF's 30mm barrel.
Is the March clearer? I don't know.
The NF, I thought was clear, maybe clearer than the March.
March definitely feels heavier and sturdier than the NF, but is it a better scope?
My eyes can't tell the difference except for the brighter March.
Is this perceived advantage worth the extra $$$ that March scopes retail at?
A look at BR shooters on the mainland and their equipment shows that the dominant BR 22 scope is NF.
"Paul Tolvstad
Here is the equipment list from the last Professional Shooting League match 2 weeks ago."
From FB Precision Rimfire.
You need to use your "zoom" on your browser to read the equipment chart.