What would be to gain from law enforcement trying to start a riot?

Where u been the past 5 years?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

What good would it have been?
Were they were trying to start a riot just to make Trump look bad? If so what good would this do since he was leaving office anyway?
Were they trying to start a riot so they could actually stop the vote results certification and keep Trump as President?
Were they trying to show how bad things were so they could convince congress for more funding/staffing?
Did someone at CNN bribe then to start a riot for good ratings?

All possible but not that plausible.

Great expose by Revolver News on the main instigator, FBI protected fed asset Ray Epps and his breach team. He’s no longer a person of interest despite literally coordinating the attack of the barriers on video, meanwhile Chewbacca and others who merely trespassed and otherwise conducted themselves peacefully have been sitting in solitary for months before getting the book thrown at them.

https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/

What good would it have been?
Were they were trying to start a riot just to make Trump look bad? If so what good would this do since he was leaving office anyway?
Were they trying to start a riot so they could actually stop the vote results certification and keep Trump as President?
Were they trying to show how bad things were so they could convince congress for more funding/staffing?
Did someone at CNN bribe then to start a riot for good ratings?

All possible but not that plausible.

Repeat, where u been the past 5 years?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Patriot act 2.0 and internet censorship

Very plausible, especially considering they were the same folks who gave us the original Patriot Act

They want to label everyone who disagrees with them a terrorist and kick off a domestic war on terror in order to do an end run around the constitution and solidify their crumbling power base

It's a move of sheer desperation.

Right here. Seems like you are avoiding the question.

Wrong. Use critical thinking skills.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

So if I understand your theory correctly, allow an attempted coup take place so they can say Trump supporters are terrorists so they can then restrict the 1st amendment?
That would be quite desperate... and hopeless (IMHO)

Cyberspace is not just about the first amendment. Controlling the flow of information of the entire world is a necessary step towards full spectrum dominance

It will never work, simply because we blew past our resource limits and things are already falling apart too quickly.

I’m going to miss my old lifestyle, but it’s a big relief to know that our criminally insane elites will never succeed.

I think it is probably harder than ever to control the flow of information. I also don't think liberals could ever hope to use Jan 6 to manage to control the flow of information. It is an interesting theory but I don't find it convincing (no offense)

I think it is probably harder than ever to control the flow of information. I also don't think liberals could ever hope to use Jan 6 to manage to control the flow of information. It is an interesting theory but I don't find it convincing (no offense)

And when fanatics convince themselves that their cause is not only indisputably just but an imperative for survival, then any doubts or questions about methods and weapons can no longer be acknowledged. The war they are fighting is of such overarching importance and righteousness that there is no such thing as unjust or excessive means to achieve it. Just a cursory examination of liberal discourse is enough to see that they have long ago arrived at and flew past this point of sectarian zealotry. And that is what explains their overwhelming support for state and corporate censorship of the internet, increasing reverence for security state agencies such as the CIA and FBI, love for and trust in corporate media, and a belief that no punishment or level of suffering is excessive when it comes to retaliation against their political enemies, including but not only those who participated in any way in the 1/6 protests.

Critical thinking skills isn't going to tell me what you think the real reason at play is here.

However if the answer was really so obvious then why wouldn't you be able to state it readily?

Part of the problem seems to be with the big lie. It is being told non stop.
Personally I think we have landed face first in bizzaro world hard. Those mostly peaceful protests that caused millions(?) In damages were obviously nothing compaired to that earth shattering event that took place on Jan 6 that nearly overturned our govt, mom and apple pie.
I hope those people that got busted for tresspassing never see the light of day. Those dirty far right conservative white supremist pizzas. Domesticated terrorrorristsss.
/Bizzaro world