I wouldn't say she is breaking her oath if she believes her interpretation of the constitution is correct. If she believes the 2nd amendment protects AR-15s then sure she is breaking her oath, but if she believes they do not qualify then she is upholding the constitution as she understands it.

So she can believe only muskets are allowed under the 2a?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

So she can believe only muskets are allowed under the 2a?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Or maybe just bolt action, I don't know if she has ever gotten in depth as to where she draws the line.

Or maybe just bolt action, I don't know if she has ever gotten in depth as to where she draws the line.

Cosponsoring a ban on all semi auto rifles is very clear where she draws the line.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Cosponsoring a ban on all semi auto rifles is very clear where she draws the line.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Then maybe that is the line she believes the 2nd amendment ends at.

Then maybe that is the line she believes the 2nd amendment ends at.

If u think gun grabbers will stop at banning "assault rifles", u need to wake up.

300ish murders annually for all rifles (bolt action too) vs. 6,000 by handguns. Doesnt take a generous to figure out 2 steps ahead.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

If u think gun grabbers will stop at banning "assault rifles", u need to wake up.

300ish murders annually for all rifles (bolt action too) vs. 6,000 by handguns. Doesnt take a generous to figure out 2 steps ahead.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

I am talking about people drawing lines in what they believe the 2nd amendment protects in relation to whether they are violating their oath.

I am talking about people drawing lines in what they believe the 2nd amendment protects in relation to whether they are violating their oath.

She is violating her oath by banning rifles. Plain and simple.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

She is violating her oath by banning rifles. Plain and simple.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

If she believes it to be in violation of the 2nd amendment and does so anyway then sure.

On another note Tusli has tweeted out support for the Rittenhouse verdict! Better than your average liberal.
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

I’ve been seeing a lot of Tulsi shorts on my YT feed lately. Here’s one where she talks about the FBI using counter terrorism tools on parents that are concerned about what is being taught in schools.

https://youtube.com/shorts/N4oGT_8aLD4?feature=share

I wouldn't say she is breaking her oath if she believes her interpretation of the constitution is correct. If she believes the 2nd amendment protects AR-15s then sure she is breaking her oath, but if she believes they do not qualify then she is upholding the constitution as she understands it.

Either way, in the last interview i saw of her , with Dave Rubin, she was asked if she might switch parties, she said she is a democrat. I just believe the democrat party has moved too far away from any common sense for her to align with.

FWIW, nothing more, nothing less.


https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=227452119428875&set=pcb.227454599428627