Nope, the plan is to keep the variant bullshit going so we can all stay safe and vote from home again. Burn those masks, stop wearing them

Nope, the plan is to keep the variant bullshit going so we can all stay safe and vote from home again. Burn those masks, stop wearing them

I was going to add, "But remember to take them off first (before burning)."  Then I thought, maybe if they have to be told, we should just leave it at that.

I love it when the trash takes itself out.   

We already had a way out, but it was inexpensive so they banned it.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/hospitalizations-mortality-cut-half-after-brazilian-city-offered-ivermectin-everyone-pre

Believe what you want. This is natural selection at work, so who am I to argue with nature?

Why should I believe an article written by an anonymous source that chooses to hide their identity?

Never trust. Always trust Dr. Josh Green only.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Why should I believe an article written by an anonymous source that chooses to hide their identity?

Wait! Wait! Wait!  So, we are supposed to believe you, "some anonymous guy" on a gun forum, when it comes to being told what COVID information is true or false, but a documented study that you didn't take the time to even read is not to be believed?

 

Why not actually read the information posted and CLICK THE F**KING LINKS.  They take you to the real life authors' names, the pre-printed research report, etc.

None of the rreports' authors is anonymous.

Nobody is hiding their identity -- except you.



https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356962821_Ivermectin_prophylaxis_used_for_COVID-19_reduces_COVID-19_infection_and_mortality_rates_A_220517-subject_populational-level_retrospective_citywide

Trust the people who are always wrong about everything

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19

At least contact your primary care physician first and find out what they have to say.

From the NIH (Yeah, a government agency, so you can trust them):

Interpretation: Ivermectin treatment was associated with lower mortality during treatment
of COVID-19, especially in patients with severe pulmonary involvement.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33065103/

From the NIH (Yeah, a government agency, so you can trust them):

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33065103/

Considering the FDA has been caught lying several times during the pandemic in regards to COVID-19 I certainly would not trust them either.

Why are you indulging that strawberry faced retard with a response?  Was the forum not shitted up enough?

Wait! Wait! Wait!  So, we are supposed to believe you, "some anonymous guy" on a gun forum, when it comes to being told what COVID information is true or false, but a documented study that you didn't take the time to even read is not to be believed?

 

Why not actually read the information posted and CLICK THE F**KING LINKS.  They take you to the real life authors' names, the pre-printed research report, etc.

None of the rreports' authors is anonymous.

Nobody is hiding their identity -- except you.



https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356962821_Ivermectin_prophylaxis_used_for_COVID-19_reduces_COVID-19_infection_and_mortality_rates_A_220517-subject_populational-level_retrospective_citywide

Posted without reading, like someone else we know....

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Why are you indulging that strawberry faced retard with a response?  Was the forum not shitted up enough?

This is not the droid strawberry faced retard we were shunning.

We haven't had to start the formal shunning of the new guy yet.

(Yeah, I know they are 99.99% likely the same person, but still.  It made me fell better!   )

Why are you indulging that strawberry faced retard with a response?  Was the forum not shitted up enough?

Why picking on gingahs?   

south africa data

4 weeks into omicron, 1.9% of positives are hospitalized
and many more weren't tested because symptoms are much milder, so this stat is likely much lower in reality
4 weeks into delta 19-20% of cases were hospitalized

south africa data

4 weeks into omicron, 1.9% of positives are hospitalized
and many more weren't tested because symptoms are much milder, so this stat is likely much lower in reality
4 weeks into delta 19-20% of cases were hospitalized

1.9% due to omicron?  Or contributor?  :hmm: