This is more a commentary on the policies of this state regarding the mentally ill than it is the judge turning him loose pending an investigation.
We treat the mentally ill as if they have the same rights to live freely in society as the rest. The only problem in this case is, he was diagnosed as being dangerous to others after having a history of violence. It seems the mentally ill are given more freedom after committing a crime for the simple fact that incarceration (1) doesn't solve the problem, and (2) incarceration makes that person the state's problem for as long as they hold him. That includes the problems they might cause among the other prisoners, for the jailers, etc. A disruptive, potentially violent person would need to go straight to solitary or a private cell until the investigation finishes.
Then there's the problem of the other inmates taking advantage of a mentally ill person just awaiting a hearing or the completed investigation. I can't imagine the things they might do to someone who it unable to defend themselves due to their condition. For that matter, how many fights might they start just from saying the wrong things?
We have absolutely NO SOLUTIONS in place for those with mental illness. As such, society pays the price. Until we as voters and as private citizens cry out to make the madness on our streets stop, the rights of the mentally ill take precedence.
- What do we do with the mentally ill committing crimes?
- Well, we can't afford to treat them all, so we arrest them, try to prescribe meds, and turn them loose again.
- So, instead of paying to arrest, medicate and deal with them when they commit crimes, why not use that money to treat them instead?
- We tried that, but found out it's cheaper to turn them loose as soon as possible than trying to actually treat them.
Hindsight is 20/20. The Cops and judge know now keeping him for 24 hours observation might have saved an innocent woman's life, but that was against policy.
