What did they lie about?
Prosecutor: "The officer is here and ready to testify. He used a laser, which is very reliable. If you don't plead guilty, we'll be seeking the maximum fine, which is $450."
The fine stated on the ticket was $265, not $450.
Prosecutor, after she said she's still fighting it, "We're going to call all the other cases before yours, so you might not even be heard today. That's means you'll have to come back again."
It was 10:15AM. Given the number of cases being actually disputed, there was no way that was going to happen. As it turns out, he was off by about 5-6 hours!
Prosecutor @10.30 as court reconvenes after the break: HE CALLS MY DAUGHTER'S CASE FIRST! As she starts toward the bench, the prosecutor "corrected himself," and told her to be seated. He then called another case.
Prosecutor @11:00 comes over and says they will be breaking for lunch at 11:30. He said she'd be called long after lunch is over. HE SUGGESTED WE GO GET LUNCH and be back about 1:00. When court reconvened after that short break, HE AGAIN CALLED MY DAUGHTER'S CASE FIRST! He looked shocked that she approached, expecting we'd taken his "advice" and gone to lunch.
As soon as the prosecutor "corrected himself" again and called a different case, the judge smiled. He obviously knew what the prosecutor was doing -- trying to rattle my daughter and/or get a summary judgement if she wasn't present when called.
The
third time he called her case, it was barely past 11:45 -- not even lunch yet. She testified after the Cop. The prosecutor spent most of his time reading a traffic stop "script" that got all of the required facts on the record: who, what, when, how, radar/laser used, qualification training on the device, calibration date, environmental factors at the stop, etc, etc. He basically went down a laundry list of questions to which the Cop supplied the answers. Then my daughter questioned the Cop. She got the answers she needed.

The prosecutor in his final arguments made a couple of lame comments that had nothing to do with her defense, which is what we'd hoped for. She'd asked "semi-irrelevant" questions about the stop just to throw the prosecutor off.
The case was dismissed. As soon as the judge said the prosecution had failed to meet its burden, the prosecutor's jaw dropped to the table! It was priceless!