She did not lie at all. She testified under oath. Anyone with different information is also welcome to testify under oath. Any takers? So far there are none. You should just give up. Stop the lies.

Swoooossshhhh

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

cool story, bro...

But the officials did say Mr. Engel, Mr. Ornato and the driver of the Suburban are prepared to confirm to the committee another damning finding from Ms. Hutchinson’s testimony: that Mr. Trump demanded his agents bring him to the Capitol so he could join his supporters, even after they emphasized the dangerous scene playing out there.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/29/us/politics/what-happened-trumps-vehicle-jan-6.html

She did not lie at all. She testified under oath. Anyone with different information is also welcome to testify under oath. Any takers? So far there are none. You should just give up. Stop the lies.

How do you know for sure she did not lie, you were there in person is the only way to say for sure. And I pretty sure you weren't. Get a clue...

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Because her testimony was under oath and there is no similar evidence to dispute her testimony, her testimony is credible. If she lied she would be charged with perjury.

Doesn't know how her phrasing of info works. SWWWOOOOSSSHHHHHH

Doesn't know how her phrasing of info works. SWWWOOOOSSSHHHHHH

#takesnoonedoesanythingillegaltooliterally

Pollyaaaannnnaaa! The sun'll come out tomorrow. . . everyone follows all laws. . . right? 

#takesnoonedoesanythingillegaltooliterally

Pollyaaaannnnaaa! The sun'll come out tomorrow. . . everyone follows all laws. . . right? 

And all join hands and sing Kumbaya!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

"Spies who lie: 51 ‘intelligence’ experts refuse to apologize for discrediting true Hunter Biden story"

https://nypost.com/2022/03/18/intelligence-experts-refuse-to-apologize-for-smearing-hunter-biden-story/

If you lie to congress in the service of the administrative state you get a promotion or a career upgrade

"Spies who lie: 51 ‘intelligence’ experts refuse to apologize for discrediting true Hunter Biden story"

https://nypost.com/2022/03/18/intelligence-experts-refuse-to-apologize-for-smearing-hunter-biden-story/

If you lie to congress in the service of the administrative state you get a promotion or a career upgrade

Or kill women and children (Waco fire).

She testified to what someone else told her.

How do you know the other person was telling her the truth?

There's a reason you don't give hearsay evidence any weight in court.  In fact, it's normally inadmissible except for under very strict circumstances.

Why have her testify to what someone else said?  Why not subpoena the person/persons that TOLD her?  THAT would be direct testimony, not hearsay.

And, according to you, nobody who's sworn into a Congressional hearing has ever lied or stretched the truth.  Give me a break! 

And you still have NOT answered if you know why a subpoena is not an indicator that the witness was willing to testify.

She testified to what someone else told her.

How do you know the other person was telling her the truth?

There's a reason you don't give hearsay evidence any weight in court.  In fact, it's normally inadmissible except for under very strict circumstances.

Why have her testify to what someone else said?  Why not subpoena the person/persons that TOLD her?  THAT would be direct testimony, not hearsay.

And, according to you, nobody who's sworn into a Congressional hearing has ever lied or stretched the truth.  Give me a break! 

And you still have answered if you know why a subpoena is not an indicator that the witness was willing to testify.

Wait so the OG person hasn't testified yet?  Good thing we got someone who claims they heard what that OG person said.  What could go wrong. BRB Raps Hawaii is calling for Aunty Nellie.

She testified to what someone else told her.

How do you know the other person was telling her the truth?

There's a reason you don't give hearsay evidence any weight in court.  In fact, it's normally inadmissible except for under very strict circumstances.

Why have her testify to what someone else said?  Why not subpoena the person/persons that TOLD her?  THAT would be direct testimony, not hearsay.

And, according to you, nobody who's sworn into a Congressional hearing has ever lied or stretched the truth.  Give me a break! 

And you still have NOT answered if you know why a subpoena is not an indicator that the witness was willing to testify.

#stillnotprovenincourt

Where do people come up with those wild ideas? 

[\sarcasm]

#stillnotprovenincourt

Where do people come up with those wild ideas? 

Facef*ck groups where they strategize their attacks.

You got hook, line, and sinkered.

She was well spoken and she didn't say anything that would bring her credibility into question. Is there some other piece of evidence from outside the hearing that brings her credibility into question?

the "note" she claimed to have written was already shown to the committee by someone else who swore under oath that he wrote it
but it's all good because EEF thinks she seemed credible...

So two people, under oath gave conflicting testimony and you automatically conclude that it is her credibility in question? Not very objective, seems like you are picking who you want to believe.

I don't want her testimony to be true and I don't want it to be false. I am looking at this objectively. Nothing I saw in her testimony shows her to be unreliable, at least not yet. If the other anonymous secret service agents come and testify under oath and give a different story then great, more information is always better. But what I see here is people rushing to find reasons not to believe her rather than really seeking the truth.

She was well spoken and she didn't say anything that would bring her credibility into question. Is there some other piece of evidence from outside the hearing that brings her credibility into question?

Guess all well spoken people must be believed.

Logic brings her credibility into question. Think abt it and come by with a reply why i said to think abt it.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Listened to the whole video, nothing they talked about proves she was lying.

Guess all well spoken people must be believed.

Logic brings her credibility into question. Think abt it and come by with a reply why i said to think abt it.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

What logic brings her credibility into question? If you think it does then you say why, I can't read your mind.

Her very specific terminology (clavicle, magnetometer) is a little unusual but this does not prove anything.
She mistakenly called the SUV the beast (the limo is the beast) but this doesn't prove anything conclusive either
She is a hearsay witness but this is a mark against the committee for not bringing in the fact witnesses, not a mark against her.

None of what she said was impossible or implausible.
-Angry Trump throws a dish? Very plausible
-Angry Trump tries to steer vehicle to get what he wants and grabs secret service officer? Nothing implausible there.

I think people are looking for reasons to disbelieve her.

What logic brings her credibility into question? If you think it does then you say why, I can't read your mind.

Her very specific terminology (clavicle, magnetometer) is a little unusual but this does not prove anything.
She mistakenly called the SUV the beast (the limo is the beast) but this doesn't prove anything conclusive either
She is a hearsay witness but this is a mark against the committee for not bringing in the fact witnesses, not a mark against her.

None of what she said was impossible or implausible.
-Angry Trump throws a dish? Very plausible
-Angry Trump tries to steer vehicle to get what he wants and grabs secret service officer? Nothing implausible there.

I think people are looking for reasons to disbelieve her.

Read what u wrote. It explains it.

Dont make me swoooooshhhh it.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Listened to the whole video, nothing they talked about proves she was lying.

You're always going to believe them no matter how much they get caught lying to you.

The satisfaction you get from being "right" is more important than watching your country get torn apart by corrupt idiots.