They made statements, u just werent told by the fake news about them. Which is why ur playing both sides generally makes sense to u.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Before I made my reply I went looking to see if they had made statements. I didn't find any direct statements, I only found their names and mentions that they were willing to testify that what happened was different than what Hutchinson said. Went through 3 pages looking for official statements from the officers but haven't found it. Maybe the fake news is just hiding it so well, but you apparently know about it so where can I find their statements so I can read their version of events?

I think your complain about fake news doesn't apply here. Even your regular mainstream media was reporting early on that two secret service officers were disputing her testimony.

What makes u think it bothers me? Im not the one who looks foolish. Ur problem, not mine.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

If objectivity makes me look foolish to you I think that says more about you than me...

If objectivity makes me look foolish to you I think that says more about you than me...

Thats whats funny, u think ur being objective.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Before I made my reply I went looking to see if they had made statements. I didn't find any direct statements, I only found their names and mentions that they were willing to testify that what happened was different than what Hutchinson said. Went through 3 pages looking for official statements from the officers but haven't found it. Maybe the fake news is just hiding it so well, but you apparently know about it so where can I find their statements so I can read their version of events?

I think your complain about fake news doesn't apply here. Even your regular mainstream media was reporting early on that two secret service officers were disputing her testimony.

The fake news isnt hiding it, theyre not reporting it. Hiding would imply its like 1 sentance on a 3 page story. Instead, they are leaving it out. Google is a thing.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

The fake news isnt hiding it, theyre not reporting it. Hiding would imply its like 1 sentance on a 3 page story. Instead, they are leaving it out. Google is a thing.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

So where can I find their statements?

Thats whats funny, u think ur being objective.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Swooosh

The fake news isnt hiding it, theyre not reporting it. Hiding would imply its like 1 sentance on a 3 page story. Instead, they are leaving it out. Google is a thing.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Googled it ... dozens of returns, but it's not surprising people who only watch MSM didn't see it.  If you aren't searching for it, you probably missed it the few times it was on a broadcast or video.

On Tuesday, reporters swiftly relayed news that the Secret Service agents disputed Hutchinson’s
account of events in the presidential vehicle.

Carol Leonnig of the Washington Post, author of two books on the Trump administration and a
history of the Secret Service, Zero Fail, said: “Sources tell me agents dispute that Donald Trump
assaulted any agent or tried to grab the steering wheel on Jan 6. They agree Trump was furious
about not being able to go to Capitol with his supporters. They offer to testify under oath.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/29/secret-service-agent-testify-trump-wheel-jan-6

Other reports, including from MSN, reported:

Anthony Guglielmi, the chief of communications for the Secret Service, said the agency has
alerted all involved parties that it is willing to make any and all of its agents and officials available
for further testimony before the committee.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/secret-service-officials-willing-to-testify-after-jan-6-witness-said-trump-lunged-grabbed-wheel/ar-AAZ0PAL

Why haven't they testified?  Maybe because they would destroy Hutchinson's testimony?  The lynch mob committee can't tolerate that.


You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think.

Googled it ... dozens of returns, but it's not surprising people who only watch MSM didn't see it.  If you aren't searching for it, you probably missed it the few times it was on a broadcast or video.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/29/secret-service-agent-testify-trump-wheel-jan-6

I saw many such news stories but I haven't found anywhere a statement detailing what the secret service agents say happened that day. I am talking about an account of what actually happened that day, not just a mention that they are willing to testify it didn't happen that day.

Why haven't they testified?  Maybe because they would destroy Hutchinson's testimony?  The lynch mob committee can't tolerate that.

We are in agreement here.

Why haven't they testified?  Maybe because they would destroy Hutchinson's testimony?  The lynch mob committee can't tolerate that.

This is what we call logic. the only reason why they haven't used the direct source is so they can have deniability that she made it up or heard wrong. So in their eyes and the eyes of their supporters, no harm. no foul.
I mean it's not like they are the federal government and can supeona them to testify.