KHON2 this morning mentioned how great of a person she was and that she believed in freedom. Then on the same channel, they cut to Fox news because they had more coverage.
Fox mentioned the queen was a fan of our constitution. Which I find hard to believe. As they were arresting reporters (1A) in the recent years. Tommy Robbinson if someone wants a specific. He was doing a report on the illegal Muslims who came into England and was told to pull the story or be arrested. He was arrested. This was during the time that all those illegals were entering various European couturiers and Trump was saying that's not good and called a racist/xenophobe.
Then the people arrested for posting on FB about a covid anti-lockdown rally. Delete the event or be arrested.
Englands stop and frisk methods (4A).
So there's that. And I'll bet she's no fan of the 2A either since England has no gun rights. So exactly what part of our Constitution was she a fan of? Or maybe they never discussed with her the Bill of Rights section, but instead just the main paragraphs. Because obviouslly she had no input over the past 70 years of the 1A, 2A, and 4A. Who knows what other amendments England doesn't like.
IDK how their laws work, but I think the Queen or any royal is just a figure head and makes no decisions. Like how a bill goes thru our congress, then to POTUS desk to sign or veto. Bills there go thru Parliment, and IDK if it needs the Queens sig or if she can veto.
Maybe Fox was wrong to make that statement, but them and KHON2's tone was that she fought for freedoms. IDK what she did prior to the past 5 years, so my above statement is based solely on recent events. If the statement about the Constitution wasn't made, then there will be no issue as they don't have the same one we have.
There will be a procession as there is when any countries leader or former leader dies or even the pope. There probably will be people crying, but not N.Korea wailing.
To her credit, she did serve during WW2 as a mechanic. As it is custom for the royal family to serve. IDK what Charles did, but William and Harry both were actively serving. So they were not in the rear behind a desk. Harry was a coast guard type helicopter rescue pilot. And Harry was an Apache helicopter pilot who was deployed to A-stan and engaged hostile targets. 1 interview, the alarm went of and he had to cut it short and run to his Apache. I'm going to assume this wasn't staged. IMO he should not have been deployed to A-stan.