No more than 8 bullets in a round (Read 2098 times)

robtmc

No more than 8 bullets in a round
« on: October 24, 2022, 10:28:49 AM »
Liberlisms shining light flickers dimly.............

Flapp_Jackson

Re: No more than 8 bullets in a round
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2022, 10:36:10 AM »
My math tells me we can have 80 bullets per 10-round magazine in his new legislation.

 :geekdanc: :thumbsup:

What's really confusing is why a president is busy talking about HIS legislation.  That's not been his job since he left Congress in 2009.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

oldfart

Re: No more than 8 bullets in a round
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2022, 10:37:48 AM »
learn something new every day
What, Me Worry?

QUIETShooter

Re: No more than 8 bullets in a round
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2022, 11:44:26 AM »
It would be criminal to allow him to run again in 2024.

Amazing how he continues to defy the laws of stupidity.
Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.

robtmc

Re: No more than 8 bullets in a round
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2022, 11:53:23 AM »
It would be criminal to allow him to run again in 2024.
Criminal election fraud got him installed the first time with a stolen election..
What stops them from trying it again?
Nothing bad happened to them last time.

QUIETShooter

Re: No more than 8 bullets in a round
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2022, 11:56:57 AM »
Criminal election fraud got him installed the first time with a stolen election..
What stops them from trying it again?
Nothing bad happened to them last time.

My hope is the mid term elections in 2 weeks.
Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.

Jl808

Re: No more than 8 bullets in a round
« Reply #6 on: October 24, 2022, 05:54:17 PM »
"Wolves" are currently in charge of watching the henhouse.
These wolves are deciding what / who to have for dinner.

So-called "sheep dogs" need to take over the watching and kick these wolves out of there.
I think, therefore I am armed.
NRA Life Patron member, HRA Life member, HiFiCo Life Member, HDF member

The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.

robtmc

Re: No more than 8 bullets in a round
« Reply #7 on: October 24, 2022, 06:59:53 PM »
"Wolves" are currently in charge of watching the henhouse.
These wolves are deciding what / who to have for dinner.

So-called "sheep dogs" need to take over the watching and kick these wolves out of there.
Sheep with captive subservient wolves that are immune to repercussions for their actions.
Strip that protection and watch the panic stricken overfed politicians (I mean sheep) run in terror.

aieahound

Re: No more than 8 bullets in a round
« Reply #8 on: October 24, 2022, 11:13:01 PM »
Hey echo chamber.
Aren’t there 9 bullets in a round of double ought buck ?
https://ammo.com/bullet-type/00-buck

Didn’t he recommend shotguns off the balcony ?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CrzyRXSxuAg" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

And that’s when he was semi-lucid.
Just Sayin’

’
"Wolves" are currently in charge of watching the henhouse.
These wolves are deciding what / who to have for dinner.

So-called "sheep dogs" need to take over the watching and kick these wolves out of there.

National we have no power. And it’s actually been kinda going our way.
Donate time and money to HIFICO if you got it or can afford it.

Focus local.
My opinion.

Edit:

HIFICO…
Because
This will be settled in the courts,
« Last Edit: October 25, 2022, 12:06:29 PM by aieahound »

changemyoil66

Re: No more than 8 bullets in a round
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2022, 10:16:25 AM »

Donate time and money to HIFICO if you got it or can afford it.

Focus local.
My opinion.


HIFICO…
Because
This will be settled in the courts,


^^^This.  A handgun mag ban lawsuit is current back on the docket after Bruen ruling.

Plus they are also working with counsel members for the "sensitive places" ordinances they're trying to pass. Right now, Big Island ones was modified heavily in our favor, but HIFICO isn't totally happy yet and wants more changes.

They are working with Oahu counsel members cause Mayor Rick mentioned he wants the same sensitive places ordinance.

My city counsel member Carol Fukunaga isn't running again. It's between Tyler Des Santos (On some kind of DNC board)  and Traci Toguchi (works for the current Carol and was in Karate Kid 2).  Tyler states when asked if "assault rifles and high cap mags" should be owned, "I think HI's current law is sufficient".  When I asked about sensitive places and having the weight of the law behind them, he stated "they should be treated like no shirt, no shoes, no service. So rules only".  He also thought to just leave the gun in the car. But I explained that would be illegal to do under current law.  When I brought up how casino's in Vegas handle armory storage for armed customers, he thought the cost would be too much for private business owners.

I'm not a fan of Tylers views on other issues, but 2A is 1 of my biggest non-negotiables. 

Traci called me back today and I spoke to her for about 40 mins.  She is a lawyer and seems much more analytical than Tyler.  She supports the constitution and when asked about AW and mags, she doesn't know much about them, but stated depends on what the courts decided.  Then when asked about sensitive places, she says like Tyler, rules, not law.  Because what if someone didn't see the sign. Plus HPD is understaffed, so who's going to enforce this.

She also mentioned she works closely with HPD and would use them for guidance if stuff is needed. I told her to take their view with a grain of salt. And gave Ballards press conference about the Diamond Head shooting  and mag ban. "These 2 numbers on my chest are why we need a mag ban".  I explained a high cap mag type rifle wasn't used. And the chief said all evidence was destroyed in the fire.  So I mentioned the autopsy report should tell what caliber is used and it was a big game rifle. We chatted about using emotion to pass laws for a few mins and she said "Wetherby rifle".  I asked how she knew that and she said she was reading the incident report as we spoke. So she agreed that Ballard was using emotion to push law.  I also told her Ballard and 11 other brass showed up in uniform to the floor vote for the mag ban and how no other HPD was present or would be allowed probably.

She then asked about more stats on AW's and like stuff, so I told her about the FBI and CDC website and it breaks it down all on there. Less than 400 murdered by rifles compared to 6000 by handguns, 2/3 of gun deaths are suicides,etc... She asked about CCW holders stopping crimes and I told her most active shootings take place in gun free zones (93%+).  She was then navigating the FBI website and confirmed my numbers. I explained to be cautious of .org websites as some studies may be slanted and she understood.  I used the Eli food court as 1 example and the TX church shooting that was stopped in 7 seconds as another.

We then talked about the Chiefs rules and I mentioned most anti 2a were cookie cutter and she isn't a fan of that type of testimony.  But also Mayor Rick wants a city ordinance like Big Island and it's on his website. Which is why I'm paying more attention to City Counsel than normal and the reason for my call.

She also asked me about NV CCW law since I told her we both have our NV CCW and her mom just moved back from Vegas.  She asked how to train HI people to deal with CCW, and I told her they just have to get used to it. No one stops going to the 9th Island cause OC is legal without a permit and CCW's are issued like candy.

Overall Traci seems more analytical, but to Tylers defense, we only chatted via FB messenger and not on the phone.