And no class action lawsuit.

Elon on the other hand gets sued.

Politics at play.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

It's a private company -- not traded publicly.

Musk can sell Twitter for a buck fifty tomorrow if he feels like it.

Nobody owes anyone else a job.

No politics at play the reason Elon is being sued is because he is an A**hole that doesn't care about employees. Look at the difference and how much better Facebook handles the layoffs:

For those who lost their job in the United States, Meta said it would pay severance of 16 weeks of their base pay, along with two additional weeks for every year they worked at the company. Laid-off workers and their families will have health care paid for six months.

Layoff of 13% of workforce vs 50%
4 month+ severance vs. Nothing
6 months healthcare vs. Nothing
Accepted Responsibility vs Blamed Workers
Notified In Person vs Notified via Email

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/09/technology/meta-layoffs-facebook.html

SWWWOOOOOOSSSHHHHH Jean.

You cannot fire someone in retaliation and firing people via email is rude. Apparently you are inexperienced in business.

As long as it makes you upset that’s all that counts

You cannot fire someone in retaliation and firing people via email is rude. Apparently you are inexperienced in business.

Jean says:The more I say something, the more I will believe it's true.

As long as it makes you upset that’s all that counts

And shows that the current course of action is correct.

Zuck fires 11,000
But it's OK cuz he said "I'm sorry"

Elon Fired  3,700
Sez "You guys were a$$ wholes" 

You cannot fire someone in retaliation and firing people via email is rude. Apparently you are inexperienced in business.

Rude?  Look who's all of a sudden "Ms. Manners!"   

He paid out MILLIONS in severance and "golden parachute" amounts to the top execs he fired.  He also continued paying the fired employees for the time being while they transition.

Are you saying firing someone "for cause" is retaliation?

Retaliation for WHAT, exactly?  The lock-out and sudden mass firing was to protect the company.  Badges were revoked, server access was revoked and they were STILL GETTING PAID.  Revoking access to the building and servers ensured none of THE EMPLOYEES "retaliated" by sabotaging the site's resources.

Get a grip.  You can't handle the truth!

Rude?  Look who's all of a sudden "Ms. Manners!"   



Are you saying firing someone "for cause" is retaliation?

I wasn't gonna post it, but

Xhe doesn't know what rude is

Xhe doesn't know what "retaliation firing" is.

At this point, I think that xhe is our resident expert on the following:

Human resources
Law
Court system
Criminal investigation process
Economics
Webster dictionary for defining what things are

Cause u know, all these post and xhe is NEVER wrong.

At this point, I think that xhe is our resident expert on the following:

Human resources
Law
Court system
Criminal investigation process
Economics
Webster dictionary for defining what things are

Cause u know, all these post and xhe is NEVER wrong.

Don't forget military training and being able to read the minds of all Republicans.

When HATE drives LOGIC and the person thinks Republicans are deplorables you get......

rhayder.

Hi rhayder!

You cannot fire someone in retaliation and firing people via email is rude. Apparently you are inexperienced in business.

Sure, you can.  In fact, if you run a business, you can fire someone for a whole lot of reasons that people might not think are fair or kind or right… as long as you don’t engage in unlawful discrimination or violate the terms of any contract that may be involved.  If somebody’s stealing from their employer, and the employer finds out and fires them, they fired them “in retaliation.”  In retaliation for stealing.

https://www.businessinsider.com/couple-both-worked-for-meta-woke-up-same-layoff-email-2022-11?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=sf-bi-ti&utm_medium=social

Couple fired via email.

Wait so our resident HR expert was WRONG AGAIN.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Sure, you can.  In fact, if you run a business, you can fire someone for a whole lot of reasons that people might not think are fair or kind or right… as long as you don’t engage in unlawful discrimination or violate the terms of any contract that may be involved.  If somebody’s stealing from their employer, and the employer finds out and fires them, they fired them “in retaliation.”  In retaliation for stealing.

Xhe is trying to throw out big words like "retaliation," hoping we don't actually think about what was posted.

It's illegal to fire someone in retaliation for being a true whistleblower -- i.e. reporting the company for committing a crime.

That's why I asked the genius what the retaliation is in response to.  It matters greatly.

Just posting "for retaliation" is an attempt to mislead.

But then, what else is new?

Xhe is trying to throw out big words like "retaliation," hoping we don't actually think about what was posted.

It's illegal to fire someone in retaliation for being a true whistleblower -- i.e. reporting the company for committing a crime.

That's why I asked the genius what the retaliation is in response to.  It matters greatly.

Just posting "for retaliation" is an attempt to mislead.

But then, what else is new?

So u asked a question and didnt get a reply because we all know xis post are jean type.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Amazon to layoff employees this week.

Class action lawsuit?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk