Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud (Read 6174 times)

ren

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #20 on: February 18, 2023, 12:31:12 PM »
must be a slow sales day
Deeds Not Words

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #21 on: February 20, 2023, 02:34:35 AM »
Who do you support? You support Republicans you are a Republican.

There you go again ... just making s#!t up!

According to you, if I'm a registered Democrat and voted for Trump, i'm really a Republican.

And if I'm a registered Republican and voted for Obama, I'm actually a Democrat.

Not sure if you're that stupid, or if you just think we are.

Your tribalistic "us vs them" mentality is a big part of what's wrong with this country.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

QUIETShooter

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #22 on: February 20, 2023, 04:48:33 AM »
I mean if the government wanted to show people that the election system is secured & trustworthy or wanted to move forward towards building back better,  they should have let the case move forward & let everything come out into the open.

Was thinking this from the very beginning.  And this is why I don't trust government.

Every f**kn person that claims to be somebody in government seems to have something to hide.
Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.

changemyoil66

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #23 on: February 20, 2023, 01:45:53 PM »
Who do you support? You support Republicans you are a Republican.
Assumption is the mother of all f-ups. Under Siege 2

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #24 on: February 20, 2023, 01:52:35 PM »
Assumption is the mother of all f-ups. Under Siege 2

Damn you!  Now I'm craving cake!  (Under Siege)
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

macsak

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #25 on: February 22, 2023, 07:01:54 AM »
yeah....
she seems quite sane and legit

ren

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #26 on: February 22, 2023, 12:06:29 PM »
home sales are down and so are stocks
Deeds Not Words

hvybarrels

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #27 on: February 22, 2023, 11:30:32 PM »
yeah....
she seems quite sane and legit



Spokesperson for a currently serving grand jury all over the networks giving crazy interviews.

Do we even have a justice department any more? Or is it just another lunatic-stuffed wing of the DNC?

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/foreman-for-georgia-grand-jury-is-a-piece-of-work-check-this-video/

Is an armadillo just a tactical opossum?

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #28 on: February 23, 2023, 02:17:20 AM »
Spokesperson for a currently serving grand jury all over the networks giving crazy interviews.

Do we even have a justice department any more? Or is it just another lunatic-stuffed wing of the DNC?

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/foreman-for-georgia-grand-jury-is-a-piece-of-work-check-this-video/



Looks like the Grand Jury report has no credibility.  If there ever are any charges filed, the foreperson just guaranteed either a mistrial or acquittal.

In the words of James Comey, "No reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."

Unfortunately, we know many prosecutors have TDS, so ...
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

ren

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #29 on: February 23, 2023, 08:10:31 AM »
Spokesperson for a currently serving grand jury all over the networks giving crazy interviews.

Do we even have a justice department any more? Or is it just another lunatic-stuffed wing of the DNC?

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/foreman-for-georgia-grand-jury-is-a-piece-of-work-check-this-video/



so much wickedness and hate from a crowd that wants "tolerance and love"
Deeds Not Words

changemyoil66

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #30 on: February 23, 2023, 09:39:19 AM »
so much wickedness and hate from a crowd that wants "tolerance and love"

Tolerance and love ONLY if you are on their side or have their same views.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #31 on: February 23, 2023, 12:06:23 PM »
UNHINGED Anti-Trump Juror BACKFIRES On Democrats,
DESTROYS Dem Attempt To STOP Trump 2024


The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

groveler

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #32 on: February 23, 2023, 02:45:03 PM »
UNHINGED Anti-Trump Juror BACKFIRES On Democrats,
DESTROYS Dem Attempt To STOP Trump 2024



Sorry, but not a damn thing will come of it.
You seem to think you are dealing with sentient beings.
By the definitions of Dr. Peter Singer,  They are not.
Dr.Singer is a favorite philosopher of Democrats.
They don't get it.
 :love:

macsak

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #33 on: February 23, 2023, 04:57:00 PM »
cool story, bro...

Lets see the indictments. They are coming in hot from multiple vectors.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #34 on: February 23, 2023, 05:47:58 PM »
Lets see the indictments. They are coming in hot from multiple vectors.

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #35 on: February 24, 2023, 04:19:26 PM »
Emily Kohrs Has Harmed Image of Trump Georgia Probe
–Former Prosecutor

Quote
The forewoman of a special grand jury in Georgia's recent spate of media interviews
may have helped Donald Trump's insistence that the investigation into his attempts to
overturn the 2020 election results is a "witch hunt," but will not hinder the inquiry, a
legal expert tells Newsweek.

Emily Kohrs, who spent eight months hearing evidence and witness testimony as part
of the Fulton County criminal probe, recently took part in a media blitz detailing some
aspects of the special grand jury's report, including indictment recommendations.
...
Elsewhere, Kohrs openly mocked Trump over the former president's claim that he had
"total exoneration" from the grand jury investigation.

"Did he really say that? Oh, that's fantastic," Kohls told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
"That's phenomenal. I love it."

Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and president of Los Angeles-based
West Coast Trial Lawyers, said that while perhaps inadvisable, Kohrs did not violate
state laws by discussing the special grand jury report as revealing its deliberations.

It is also Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, not the special grand jury, who
will ultimately decide on whether to bring forward any charges in the investigation.

"Kohrs' media tour isn't helpful, and feeds into Trump's argument that the grand jury
investigation is a political witch hunt by a Democratic district attorney and the left-leaning
mainstream news media," Rahmani told Newsweek.

"But setting aside the bad optics, it won't have much of a legal effect on a potential
indictment. The special grand jury could only investigate and make recommendations
on what charges to bring. Willis can indict Trump or others because of, or in spite of,
Kohrs and her fellow grand jurors' recommendations," he said.

Kohrs has been widely condemned for giving such extensive media interviews about
the ongoing case.

Former Department of Justice inspector general Michael Bromwich described Kohrs as
a "reckless idiot" on Twitter amid reports that a number of Republican witnesses in Fulton
County are preparing to move to quash any possible indictments because of her public
statements during the ongoing criminal investigation.
https://www.newsweek.com/emily-kohrs-harmed-trump-image-special-grand-jury-georgia-1783332

if a professional dept of justice official (former) describes her as a "reckless idiot", what does that say about the grand jury in general?  She was the forewoman, which means she guided the deliberations and drafted the recommended indictments. 

How many of us would wish for a reckless idiot leading the grand jury deciding our own fate?

Unhinged Anti Trump Juror Goes On INSANE Media Tour,
Sabotages Democrat Anti Trump Plot


The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #36 on: February 25, 2023, 03:57:46 AM »
The Judge supervising the grand jury responded to this right wingnut misinformation campaign  the juror did nothing wrong and could disclose more if she likes. Your information is wrong. You're spreading more lies which I guess is your specialty.

This is not "my information."  i posted quotes and links from the sources.

Stop being so idiotic.  You rarely post trusted sources to support your BS.

Calling this a misinformation campaign is comical when that's all you do on here.

Try again, Karen.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Per Grand Jury - There was no election fraud
« Reply #37 on: February 26, 2023, 07:00:10 PM »
Quote
Kohrs also told CNN that she would be deeply disappointed if no charges resulted
from the grand jury’s eight months of work — a comment that drew criticism from some quarters,
since the length of an investigation should not determine whether indictments follow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/georgia-juror-unsettles-trump-investigation-with-revealing-interviews/ar-AA17OGuh

It doesn't matter how many days, weeks or months the grand jury was listening to testimony.  Some grand juries are empaneled for a fixed amount of time.  In Georgia, the length of time varies by county from 2 to 6 months.  if a case takes longer, they remain serving until their work is completed.  Once the work is done, the results are supposed to be based on the information presented and not the amount of time spent on the case.

The purpose of any jury is to protect the rights of the accused so they can receive a fair trial, or in the case of a grand jury so the charges -- if any -- fit the crime.  Period.  That's the whole reason regular citizens listen to the evidence and decide on the outcome -- so the state doesn't get to decide for us all.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw