Damn you guys all out there rocking 15 round mags in your glock 19’s? Damn I’ve been doing it all wrong with my legal 10 round mags.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted about 4 comments.  The "waiting for approval" messages are gone, and my comments haven't posted.

The latest comment I see is 2 hours old.  Hopefully mine will appear soon as opposed to being deleted as they have been in the past.

Color within the lines, but color boldly

Aloha, Denby, your kind of people have assured the only ones angry and frustrated with guns will be the ones we call criminals.

They are the ones you need to worry about.

Worry away, Dear Denby.

Denby Fawcett: With So Much Rage In Everyday Life Do We Want People Armed In Public?

People who think like her are projecting their own flaws - they do not possess the discipline to own a firearm or anything like it for that matter.

Denby Fawcett: With So Much Rage In Everyday Life Do We Want People Armed In Public?

People who think like her are projecting their own flaws - they do not possess the discipline to own a firearm or anything like it for that matter.

That, and she doesn't see the flaw in that 'logic".  Will disarming innocent, law-abiding people fix the rage problem? 

Nope.  All it does is make it easier for the Ragers to attack anyone they want without fear of being shot.

I'm shocked!  All 5 of my posts are visible (for now).

Took a long time for review, but at least they posted.

I expect them to be gone soon, though, after the anti-2A commenters flag my comments.

EDIT:  Down to 4 comments now.   

I submitted 2-3 more to offset the decline.   

ANOTHER EDiT:
Just checked.  i have 7 comments that so far remain in that section.   

I submitted 8, so somebody must have been offended and had one taken down.

All in all, this is the best I've ever experienced from CB on any gun-related comments i've tried to post.  I was banned once for posting "too many" times in a day on one topic, although that number isn't defined anywhere -- totally arbitrary and up to the moderator.

Denby Fawcett: With So Much Rage In Everyday Life Do We Want People Armed In Public?

People who think like her are projecting their own flaws - they do not possess the discipline to own a firearm or anything like it for that matter.

That's my experience too. Most of the people who rage against guns aren't mentally stable enough to be trusted with one.

That's my experience too. Most of the people who rage against guns aren't mentally stable enough to be trusted with one.

i think the entire adult population should be required to apply for a firearm at least once.

Not only would they better understand the laws already on the books (and how confusing they become from state to state), but it would also deny a huge number of them.

The ones who get denied should refrain from being anti-gun activists, because they proved the system we already have works.  Obviously, if others are being approved, there must be a lot of people in the country who don't share the same legal, mental and rage issues as those people.

Well, almost all of my comments made it to the webpage, but one in particular still isn't showing.

One guy posted:

I’ve been married for 40 years and consider myself an educated rational person,; but over the
years my husband and I have had passionate arguments and I’m glad there was not a firearm
in the home because even the most rational person can become impulsive and irrational quickly.

My question to all the gun advocates is this,; do you truly feel that unsafe in your daily life in
Hawaii to carry a firearm?

My response -- in addition to mentioning that the weapon doesn't change what's in your heart and that knives, hammers and hands kill too -- was basically a question: If your spouse was violent towards you, and you feared for you life, would you not want the best self defense tool available to stop them?  You have a right to defend yourself, even against a spouse.

You wouldn't even have to fire the gun -- just be willing and able to.  Most defensive uses of guns end the attack without firing a shot because the attacker flees, backs off, or submits rather than getting shot.

Well, almost all of my comments made it to the webpage, but one in particular still isn't showing.

One guy posted:
My response -- in addition to mentioning that the weapon doesn't change what's in your heart and that knives, hammers and hands kill too -- was basically a question: If your spouse was violent towards you, and you feared for you life, would you not want the best self defense tool available to stop them?  You have a right to defend yourself, even against a spouse.

You wouldn't even have to fire the gun -- just be willing and able to.  Most defensive uses of guns end the attack without firing a shot because the attacker flees, backs off, or submits rather than getting shot.

Her statement is not logical. She says she is rational but contradicts her flawed self-assessment that even a rational person can be impulsive. So..she is not rational at all. People like her lack the self-awareness to NOT act on initial emotions. So dumb.

Her statement is not logical. She says she is rational but contradicts her flawed self-assessment that even a rational person can be impulsive. So..she is not rational at all. People like her lack the self-awareness to NOT act on initial emotions. So dumb.

A crazy person doesn't know they are crazy, so they think they are sane.

If you're crazy and you know it, then you're sane because, unlike a crazy person, you are able to recognize your mental state is bad.

But if you're crazy and you don't know it, then you THINK you are sane because you are not able to recognize your mental state is bad.

Classic Catch-22.